Welcome to the latest edition of the Financial Regulation Weekly Bulletin.
If you would like to discuss in more detail, please contact your relationship partner or email one of our Financial Regulation team.
Developments this week are in relation to:
|
Key Insights
- The surge of distress and insolvency that occurred in 2024 showed no signs of stopping in 2025.
- Inflation, continued regulatory changes and global uncertainty have contributed to the continued rise in insolvency appointments, especially in the construction and hospitality sectors.
- Key trends included M&A, lenders supporting an operational or balance sheet restructuring, government intervention and increased regulatory scrutiny of private capital.
1. Distress and restructuring trends in 2025
1 2 Capital Market 9 Dispute Resolution 14 Fintech 19 Media and Entertainment 24 RERA 27 Sports and Gaming 39 White Collar Crime 03 Competition Law 11 Employment Law 17 International Trade/ WTO 19 MCA 25 Restructuring and Insolvency 34 Technology 40 3 EXTENSION OF TIMELINE FOR FORMULATION OF IMPLEMENTATION STANDARDS PERTAINING TO SEBI CIRCULAR ON “SAFER PARTICIPATION OF RETAIL INVESTORS IN ALGORITHMIC TRADING”1 Securities Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) issued a circular “Safer participation of retail investors in algorithmic trading” dated February 04, 2025, which aimed at ensuring safer
MONTHLY NEWSLETTER SERIES APRIL, 2025 | VOL. XXIII VAISH ASSOCIATES ADVOCATES LEGALAXY WWW.VAISHLAW.COM LEGAL MAXIM Inter alia: “Among other things” MONTHLY NEWSLETTER SERIES APRIL, 2025 | VOL.
If the overarching theme of 2024 was continued uncertainty (Ten litigation trends to watch for 2024), 2025 already looks set to be another unpredictable year. Various doom-laden economic forecasts indicate that 2025 will be a challenging year for the UK economy.
1 SOLVENCY II 1.1 First batch of EIOPA consultations on technical standards under expected amendments to Solvency II Directive On 1 October 2024, EIOPA published its first batch of consultation papers on technical standards which relate to anticipated changes under the Solvency II Directive1.
On July 31, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada provided clarity regarding the treatment of administrative monetary penalties and disgorgement orders resulting from securities violations in Poonian v. British Columbia (Securities Commission).
本文结合了笔者承办的2023年度“全国破产经典案例”哈尔滨工大高新技术产业开发股份有限公司等五家公司破产重整案和近年来约50家退市公司重整的理论分析和实践经验,探讨退市公司独有的重整价值、重整路径及实务中的常见争议疑难问题,现采撷文章要点,抛砖引玉供各界同仁研究探讨。
一、引言
2024年4月,国务院出台《关于加强监管防范风险推动资本市场高质量发展的若干意见》,中国证券监督管理委员会出台《关于严格执行退市制度的意见》,证券交易所修订《上海证券交易所股票上市规则》《深圳证券交易所股票上市规则》等业务规则(以下合称“国九条及相关配套文件”)。“国九条及相关配套文件”旨在加强对市场的监管,倡导退市常态化。在2019年以前,每年退市数量几乎都在个位数;自2019年开始,上市公司退市逐渐进入加速状态,2020年退市数量达到20家,2021年退市数量达到23家,2022年退市数量达到50家,2023年退市数量达到46家,2024年度截至9月6日已经退市49家企业。上市公司退市后的出路作为整体性退市制度设计的一环,退市公司破产重整逐渐引发学界和市场的关注。