Fulltext Search
Closing in on Make-Wholes: The Fifth Circuit’s Ultra Decision

On January 17, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (the “FifthCircuit”) issued a decision in In re Ultra Petroleum Corp. that could have significant implications for creditors seeking payment of contractual make-whole amounts and post-petition interest from chapter 11 debtors.[1]

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Fifth Circuit
Delaware Bankruptcy Court Finds that Section 546(e) Does Not Protect Fraudulent Transfers Following Supreme Court’s Ruling in Merit Management

The Bottom Line

In one of the first applications of the Supreme Court’s ruling on the scope of section 546(e) in Merit Management, Delaware Bankruptcy Court Judge Carey found that section 546(e)’s safe harbor did not apply to fraudulent transfers between two parties that were not financial institutions, even if the transaction passed through financial intermediaries.

What Happened

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, United States bankruptcy court
Insurance Rehabilitation Proceeding in Curaçao Recognized by New York Bankruptcy Court

The Bottom Line

In In re ENNIA Caribe Holding N.V., 18-12908 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2018), a bankruptcy court in the Southern District of New York recognized a foreign insurance company’s rehabilitation proceeding in Curaçao as a “foreign main proceeding,” pursuant to Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code, over objections from the insurance company’s nondebtor parent company. In doing so, the court examined, among other things, what is required for a “collective proceeding” in a foreign insolvency.

What Happened

USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Third Circuit Upholds Right of Tenant to Continued Possession of Rejected Lease Premises and Reduced Rent Payable to Purchaser After Sale of Premises

The Bottom Line

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Third Circuit
You Say Advance, I Say Repay - What Does the Court of Appeal Say?

Clarification by the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) on Contracts

Case: Leibson Corporation and Others v TOC Investments Corporation and Others [2018] EWCA Civ 763 (17 April 2018).

United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Morrison & Foerster LLP, BNP Paribas
New UNCITRAL Model Law to Facilitate Cross-Border Restructuring and Insolvency

Summary

Global, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Morrison & Foerster LLP, UNCITRAL
SDNY District Court Holds That Bankruptcy Courts Have Core Jurisdiction and Constitutional Adjudicatory Authority over Involuntary Third-Party Releases

The Bottom Line

USA, New York, Capital Markets, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Res judicata and issue estoppel, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
How the UK Government's “No Deal Brexit” Planning Impacts Cross-Border Restructuring and Insolvency in the UK

English law restructuring and insolvency tools are used to implement financial restructurings and the external administration of foreign companies. The attractiveness of the English tools and legal system is highlighted by the prevalence of companies incorporated abroad, especially companies incorporated in the EU, which avail themselves of those tools. English law in this area is impacted by much European law.

European Union, Global, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Public, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Brexit
Fifth Circuit Holds Executory Contract Not Listed on Bankruptcy Schedules Is Automatically Rejected Upon Expiration of 60-Day Period in Chapter 7 and Not Capable of Being Sold

The Bottom Line

The Fifth Circuit recently held in RPD Holdings, L.L.C. v. Tech Pharmacy Services (In re Provider Meds, L.L.C.), No. 17-1113 (5th Cir. Oct. 29, 2018), that a patent license that was not specifically listed on the debtors’ bankruptcy schedules was automatically deemed rejected where it was not assumed within 60 days of the cases’ conversion from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7.

What Happened?

USA, Texas, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Patents, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Fifth Circuit
Third Circuit Remands W.R. Grace Decision Concerning Plan Channeling Injunction and Insurance Providers, Providing Additional Insights for Third Parties and Claimants

The Bottom Line

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Third Circuit