Fulltext Search
EuroResource--deals and debt

Recent Developments

Argentina, Cyprus, France, United Kingdom, USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Jones Day, Bond (finance), Hedge funds, Debt, Default (finance), UNCITRAL, Second Circuit
Euroresource--deals and debt

Recent Developments

Argentina, Germany, Global, Spain, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bond (finance), Debt, Default (finance), Second Circuit
Euroresource--deals and debt

Recent Developments

Argentina, European Union, USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Public, Jones Day, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Hedge funds, Debt, Default (finance), Debt restructuring, ECB, Second Circuit
EuroResource--deals and debt

Global—On 26 October 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a ruling that may impact sovereign debt restructurings, upheld a lower court order enjoining Argentina from making payments on restructured defaulted debt without making comparable payments to bondholders who did not participate in the restructuring.

Spain, United Kingdom, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bond (finance), Injunction, Security (finance), Debt, Default (finance), Second Circuit
Euroresource--deals and debt

Recent Developments

European Union, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Debtor, Board of directors, European Commission, European Banking Authority, ECB
Euroresource—deals and debt

Recent Developments

Belgium, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, Banking, Competition & Antitrust, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Jones Day
No costs allowed to petitioner who challenged a sales tax assessment

A New York State Administrative Law Judge has denied an application for costs and fees filed by a petitioner who had succeeded in substantially reducing the asserted tax liability through settlement. Matter of Frank M. Grillo, DTA No. 823237 (N.Y.S. Div. of Tax App., Nov. 3, 2011). The decision turned on whether the position of the Department of Taxation and Finance was substantially justified, and that, in turn, depended upon whether the Department had used the correct address when it sent the Notice of Determination to the petitioner.

USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Title 11 of the US Code, Administrative law judge, Chief operating officer, United States bankruptcy court