The Office of Public Sector Information (OPSI) has published The Insolvency (Scotland) Amendment (No. 2) Rules 2009. These Rules amend the Insolvency (Scotland) Rules 1986 (S.I. 1986/1915). No Regulatory Impact Assessment has been prepared in relation to these Rules as they are not expected to impose any significant burdens on business.

View The Insolvency (Scotland) Amendment (No. 2) Rules 2009, 1 September 2009  

The making of a bankruptcy order alone will not deprive a judgment creditor of a final charging order where it is obtained before the bankruptcy order is made.

Summary

The Treasury has published the Financial Markets and Insolvency (Settlement Finality) (Amendment) Regulations 2009, which will come into force on 1 October 2009. They will amend the Financial Markets and Insolvency (Settlement Finality) Regulations 1999, following changes in insolvency law.  

To avoid an asset reverting to a bankrupt after the end of his period of bankruptcy, the asset must be realised. An assignment of a beneficial interest for a future price does not amount to a realisation.

The courts have the power to and increasingly will make a civil restraint order where an individual persistently issues claims that are totally without merit.

The FSA has published a statement entitled Wider implications referral: Lehman-backed structured products.  

In the statement the FSA together with the Financial Ombudsman Service have jointly concluded that the Lehman Brothers’ insolvency raises issues in the UK structured products market.  

It has been agreed that the FSA will now consider issues relating to Lehman-backed structured products under “the wider implications process” in order to allow it to explore all options to achieve the best outcome for consumers.  

Generally, financial services firms in Germany (Finanzdienstleistungsinstitute) are mandatory members of a protection scheme (Entschädigungseinrichtung der Wertpapierhandelsunternehmen - EdW). Members of this protection scheme are obliged to make regular financial contributions.

In 2005 Phoenix Kapitaldienst GmbH became insolvent and the EdW is due to pay out to Phoenix investors compensation which totals more than 100 million Euros. However, the EdW has insufficient funds to cover the entire amount due.

Where a debtor's assets exceed his liabilities, the onus is on the debtor to prove he can not pay his debts if a creditor seeks to annul the bankruptcy order.

In Paulin v Paulin and another, the defendant petitioned for his own bankruptcy claiming he was unable to pay his debts. The claimant applied for the order to be annulled claiming the defendant could afford to pay his debts and was deliberately attempting to defeat her claims in the matrimonial proceedings.

Where the entirety of a debt is not included in an agreement to settle, a creditor can continue to prove in a bankruptcy for the balance.