Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    First impressions: commercial leases may be assumed within 210-day deadline and assigned later
    2013-11-21

    Commercial landlords hailed as a significant victory the enactment in 2005 of a 210-day “drop dead” period after which a lease of nonresidential real property with respect to which the debtor is the lessee is deemed rejected unless, prior to the expiration of the period, a chapter 11 debtor in possession (“DIP”) or bankruptcy trustee assumes or rejects the lease.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Jones Day, Debtor, Landlord
    Authors:
    Charles M. Oellermann , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Euroresource--deals and debt
    2013-06-28

    Recent Developments

    Filed under:
    Argentina, Germany, United Kingdom, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Jones Day, Debtor, Debt, HM Treasury (UK)
    Authors:
    Corinne Ball , Laurent Assaya , Dr. Olaf Benning , Víctor Casarrubios , Juan Ferré
    Location:
    Argentina, Germany, Macau, United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    In brief: claims-trading hobgoblins redux?
    2012-12-01

    In the July/August 2012 edition of the Business Restructuring Review, we reported on a Delaware bankruptcy-court ruling that reignited the debate concerning whether sold or assigned claims can be subject to disallowance under section 502(d) of the Bankruptcy Code on the basis of the seller’s receipt of a voidable transfer. In In re KB Toys, Inc., 470 B.R. 331 (Bankr. D. Del. 2012), the court rejected as unworkable the distinction between a sale and an assignment of a claim for purposes of disallowance that was drawn by the district court in Enron Corp. v. Springfield Associates, L.L.C.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Enron
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Amended bankruptcy rules approved by the U.S. Supreme Court
    2012-06-12

    On April 23, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court approved amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. The amended rules automatically become effective on December 1, 2012, unless Congress acts before then to reject, modify, or delay the rule changes. Several of the amendments involve technical and conforming changes to eliminate inconsistencies within the existing Bankruptcy Rules, as well as changes designed to make the bankruptcy rules consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    WaMu confirmation denied: interest rates, equitable disallowance, and insider trading
    2011-12-06

    InIn re Washington Mutual, Inc., 2011 WL 4090757 (Bankr. D. Del. Sept. 13, 2011), Judge Mary F. Walrath of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware denied confirmation of the debtors’ proposed chapter 11 plan and instead referred the litigants to mediation in order to move the case toward a confirmable resolution.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Insider trading
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Stern v. Marshall - shaking bankruptcy jurisdiction to its core?
    2011-08-01

    In Stern v. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011), the estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall, a.k.a. Anna Nicole Smith, lost by a 5-4 margin Round 2 of its Supreme Court bout with the estate of E. Pierce Marshall in a contest over Vickie's rights to a portion of the fortune of her late husband, billionaire J. Howard Marshall II. The dollar figures in dispute, amounting to more than $400 million, and the celebrity status of the original (and now deceased) litigants may grab headlines.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Tortious interference, Defamation, Constitutionality, Jury trial, Article III US Constitution, SCOTUS, Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Ben Rosenblum , Scott J. Friedman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    From the top: recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling
    2011-04-01

    The U.S. Supreme Court’s October 2010 Term (which extends from October 2010 to October 2011, although the Court hears argument only until June or July) officially got underway on October 4, three days after Elena Kagan was formally sworn in as the Court’s 112th Justice and one of three female Justices sitting on the Court.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Debtor, Federal Reporter, Ex post facto law, Debt, Tax deduction, Dissenting opinion, Majority opinion, Article III US Constitution, Internal Revenue Service (USA), US Congress, Westlaw, SCOTUS, Ninth Circuit
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    The end of Frenville: relief or more confusion?
    2010-08-10

    As part of the overhaul of bankruptcy laws in 1978, Congress for the first time included the definition of "claim" as part of the Bankruptcy Code. A few years later, in Avellino & Bienes v. M. Frenville Co. (In re M. Frenville Co.), the Third Circuit became the first court of appeals to examine the scope of this new definition in the context of the automatic stay.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Conflict of laws, Retail, Debtor, Injunction, Liquidation, Bankruptcy discharge, Title 11 of the US Code, US Congress, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Paul M. Green
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Can an executory contract lose its executoriness? "Maybe," says the Second Circuit
    2008-08-01

    The ability of a chapter 11 debtor-in-possession (“DIP”) or bankruptcy trustee to assume or reject unexpired leases or contracts that are “executory” as of the bankruptcy filing date is one of the most important entitlements created by the Bankruptcy Code. It allows a DIP to rid itself of onerous contracts and to preserve contracts that can either benefit its reorganized business or be assigned to generate value for the bankruptcy estate and/or fund distributions to creditors under a chapter 11 plan.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Breach of contract, Employment contract, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, Trustee
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Enron redux: round two goes to claims purchasers/traders
    2007-10-01

    In previous editions of the Business Restructuring Review, we reported on a pair of highly controversial rulings handed down in late 2005 and early 2006 by the New York bankruptcy court overseeing the chapter 11 cases of embattled energy broker Enron Corporation and its affiliates. In the first, Bankruptcy Judge Arthur J. Gonzalez held that a claim is subject to equitable subordination under section 510(c) of the Bankruptcy Code even if it is assigned to a third-party transferee who was not involved in any misconduct committed by the original holder of the debt.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Security (finance), Fraud, Fiduciary, Common law, Asset forfeiture, Title 11 of the US Code, Citibank, Enron, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 1513
    • Page 1514
    • Page 1515
    • Page 1516
    • Current page 1517
    • Page 1518
    • Page 1519
    • Page 1520
    • Page 1521
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days