Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    FSD determination affecting Lehman Brothers scheme
    2010-09-30

    On 17 September, the Pension Regulator's Determinations Panel announced that it had issued a determination that six companies within the Lehman Brothers group (including the group's main operating companies in the UK as well as the US parent Lehman Brothers Holding Inc.) should provide financial support to the Lehman Brothers Pension Scheme. This followed a hearing on 8-9 September 2010.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Joint and several liability, Defined benefit pension plan, Subsidiary, Pensions Act 2004 (UK), Lehman Brothers
    Authors:
    Ian Gault , Daniel Schaffer , Alison Brown , Roderick Morton
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Court of Appeal reverses earlier decision and holds that anti-deprivation principle does not apply to provisions relating to the termination of an IP licence on insolvency
    2010-01-26

    In September 2009 we reported on the first instance decision in Butters and ors v BBC Worldwide Ltd and ors, accessible here in which the Court held that contractual provisions in a joint venture agreement taken together with termination provisions in a licence of IP rights were void since the effect of those provisions on insolvency was to deprive creditors' access to assets and therefore contrary

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Media & Entertainment, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Share (finance), Joint venture, Subsidiary, Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Authors:
    Joel Smith , Laura Deacon
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    IP licences and insolvency - deprivation principle held to apply to provisions relating to the termination of an IP licence on insolvency
    2009-09-18

    In Butters and ors v BBC Worldwide Ltd and ors, decided on 20 August 2009, the Court held that contractual provisions in a joint venture agreement taken together with termination provisions in a licence of IP rights were void since the effect of those provisions on insolvency was to deprive creditors access to assets and therefore contrary to public policy in the light of insolvency laws.

    BUSINESS IMPACT

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Joint venture, Public limited company, Prejudice, Subsidiary
    Authors:
    Joel Smith , Laura Deacon
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Court's jurisdiction to make orders under Section 221 of the Companies Ordinance confirmed
    2007-01-15

    Hong Kong's highest court has recently considered the extent of the court's sweeping jurisdiction under section 221 of the Companies Ordinance, which enables it (amongst other things) to compel companies in liquidation to produce documents and for individuals to be examined on oath. The case will be welcomed by liquidators given that the court unanimously confirmed that it has jurisdiction to make such orders under this "extraordinary" section.

    Filed under:
    Hong Kong, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Public consultations, Legal burden of proof, Witness, Liquidation, Involuntary dismissal, Subpoena, Liquidator (law), Subsidiary, Court of Final Appeal (Hong Kong)
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Lehman derivatives transaction did not run afoul of fraudulent conveyance rules, says UKSC
    2011-09-29

    In 2002 a European subsidiary of Lehman Brothers created a complicated synthetic debt structure called Dante, which was intended to provide credit insurance for another subsidiary, LBSF, against credit events affecting certain reference entities, the obligations of which formed the reference portfolio. A special purpose vehicle issued notes to investors, the proceeds of which were used to purchase collateral which vested in a trust. The issuer entered into a swap with LBSF under which LBSF received the income on the collateral and paid the issuer the amount of interest due to noteholders.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Collateral (finance), Interest, Swap (finance), Debt, Good faith, Common law, Default (finance), Subsidiary, Lehman Brothers, UK Supreme Court, Trustee
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
    Federal Reserve Board proposes phase-in period for SLHC reporting
    2011-08-29

    On August 22nd, the Federal Reserve Board proposed a two-year phase-in period for most savings and loan holding companies ("SLHCs") to file Federal Reserve regulatory reports with the Board and an exemption for some SLHCs from initially filing Federal Reserve regulatory reports. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, supervisory and rulemaking authority for SLHCs and their non-depository subsidiaries was transferred from the OTS to the Board. The Board previously sought comment on whether to require SLHCs to submit the same reports as bank holding companies.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Winston & Strawn LLP, Tax exemption, Federal Reserve Board, Holding company, Bank holding company, Subsidiary, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA), Federal Reserve System
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    In pari delicto
    2011-04-18

    On April 12th, a federal district court addressed the in pari delicto defense, including the sole actor exception to the adverse interest exception. In the instant case, a litigation trust created in bankruptcy court to pursue the debtor's claims sued Credit Suisse for allegedly assisting the debtor's founders' looting of the debtor's subsidiaries. Credit Suisse sought summary judgment, asserting the in pari delicto defense. The Court agreed, finding that the evidence supported the conclusion that the founders so dominated the subsidiaries that the subsidiaries lacked a separate existence.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Winston & Strawn LLP, Interest, Subsidiary, Credit Suisse, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    United States district court overturns widely criticized fraudulent transfer decision – (In re TOUSA, Inc., No. 10-60017-CIV/Gold (S.D. Fla. Feb. 11, 2011))
    2011-02-16

    The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has reversed a bankruptcy court order that had required a group of lenders (“Transeastern Lenders”) to disgorge, as a fraudulent transfer, approximately $421 million paid to them by a joint venture partner (“TOUSA”) in satisfaction of their legitimate, uncontested loans to the joint venture that TOUSA had guaranteed. Together with pre-judgment interest, the total amount to be paid by the Transeastern Lenders was in excess of $480 million.

    Filed under:
    USA, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Winston & Strawn LLP, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Interest, Market liquidity, Debt, Joint venture, Default (finance), Subsidiary, Memorandum opinion, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for Southern District of Florida
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    AIG restructuring
    2010-11-08

    On November 1st, the Treasury Department provided an update regarding the federal government's involvement with AIG. AIG will use the proceeds from its sale of one unit and the IPO from a second to repay the loan extended to AIG by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and to repurchase a substantial amount of the FRBNY's preferred interests in certain AIG subsidiaries. AIG will then draw up to $22 billion in remaining Troubled Asset Relief Program funds from the Treasury Department to restructure its governmental obligations.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Winston & Strawn LLP, Share (finance), Initial public offering, Subsidiary, Preferred stock, US Federal Government, US Department of the Treasury, American International Group, Bank of New York Mellon
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    The GGP case—what it means for lenders
    2009-06-03

    On April 16, General Growth Properties, Inc. and certain of its affiliates (“GGP”) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. GGP operates a national network of approximately 200 shopping centers. To the surprise of many, most of GGP’s property-specific SPE subsidiaries (“SPE Debtors”) also filed for bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Fiduciary, Debt, Credit risk, Mortgage loan, Foreclosure, Real estate investment trust, Maturity (finance), Cashflow, Subsidiary, Secured loan, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 37
    • Page 38
    • Page 39
    • Page 40
    • Page 41
    • Page 42
    • Page 43
    • Current page 44
    • Page 45
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days