Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Cash-flow insolvency
    2018-04-04

    The German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) has taken the opportunity to clarify its position on section 17(2) German Insolvency Act (Insolvenzordnung, InsO).  According to sec. 17(2) a debtor is deemed insolvent if he is unable to pay his debts as they fall due (Zahlungsunfähigkeit).

    Filed under:
    Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ashfords LLP, Federal Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Alan Bennett
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    Insolvenzrechtliche Einordnung des Nachteilsausgleichs
    2018-04-10

    Für die Einordnung des Nachteilsausgleichs als Masseverbindlichkeit oder als Insolvenzforderung ist der Zeitpunkt der Durchführung der Betriebsänderung entscheidend.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, CMS Germany
    Authors:
    Daniel Hennig , Lennard Lürwer
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    CMS Germany
    German Federal Civil Court strengthens Leasing Receivables Securitisation, Factoring and Asset Based Lending in the Lessor’s Insolvency
    2018-04-19

    In Germany, securitization SPVs, factoring companies and asset based lenders take security over the leased assets owned by the leasing company by way of a security transfer of title. However, in all cases of a leasing company’s insolvency where the leasing company has still possession of the assets, the owner of the security in the leased assets was in the past not seen as being entitled to realise the value of the assets itself.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs
    Authors:
    Jens Rinze , Andreas Lehmann
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Insolvenzgeld und Insolvenzgeldvorfinanzierung in der Praxis
    2018-05-22

    Insolvenzgeld – ein wichtiges Instrument zur Sanierung von Unternehmen und Erhalt der Mitarbeitermotivation. Wie ist der rechtliche Rahmen?

    Filed under:
    Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, CMS Germany
    Authors:
    Dr. Boris Alles , Anna Schwarzer
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    CMS Germany
    German Federal Court (BGH) bolsters creditor's rights in debtor in possession proceedings by ruling on director's liability vis-à-vis creditors
    2018-05-22

    In its April 2018 decision, the BGH ruled on the question whether the directors of a company that has been granted debtor in possession status by the respective insolvency court can become personally liable for a breach of a duty of care vis-à-vis the creditors like an insolvency administrator. The underlying legal question was the subject of a controversial academic discussion in the past.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White & Case, Debtor in possession, Directors' duties, Federal Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Riaz K. Janjuah , Sylvia Fiebig , Jonas Tangermann
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    White & Case
    Berlin to Korneuburg: NIKI's insolvency proceedings
    2018-05-25

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clifford Chance
    Authors:
    Cristina Weidner
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Clifford Chance
    Reform: Neues Insolvenzanfechtungsrecht zugunsten von Arbeitnehmern
    2018-06-04

    Die neue Reform des Insolvenzanfechtungsrecht durch den Gesetzgeber löst einige Rechtsfragen des BAG und BGH zugunsten von Arbeitnehmern.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, CMS Germany
    Authors:
    Dr. Boris Alles , Anna Schwarzer
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    CMS Germany
    Annahmeverzugslohn in der Insolvenz
    2018-03-01

    Qualifizierung des Annahmeverzugslohns als Neuforderung oder Altmasseverbindlichkeit von Kündigungsmöglichkeit vor Entstehung des Lohnanspruchs abhängig.

    Ob eine Forderung in der Insolvenz als Neuforderung oder Altmasseverbindlichkeit eingestuft wird, ist in der Praxis, auf Grund der gesetzlichen Reihenfolge der Befriedigung, von wesentlicher Bedeutung.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, CMS Germany, Federal Labour Court of Germany
    Authors:
    Lennard Lürwer , Daniel Hennig
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    CMS Germany
    German Court rejects the “bow wave theory” (“Bugwellentheorie”) in test for company illiquidity
    2018-02-15

    Under German law, there are strict legal obligations for the managing directors of an insolvent company to file for insolvency. Failure to comply exposes a managing director to civil and criminal liability. It is therefore important for managing directors to know how to test whether their company is insolvent. One of the legal reasons for insolvency is illiquidity and the second senate of the German Federal Civil Court (“BGH”) has, in a decision dated 19 December 2017 (II ZR 88/16), clarified a question regarding the illiquidity test.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Market liquidity
    Authors:
    Andreas Lehmann
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Kündigen in der Insolvenz - eine schwere Übung!
    2018-02-23

    Ein Insolvenzverwalter kann sich nach Anzeige der Masseunzulänglichkeit nicht auf die Wirksamkeit einer bereits ausgesprochenen Kündigung verlassen und das Ergebnis des Kündigungsschutzprozesses abwarten, sondern muss erneut kündigen, um die Entstehung von weiteren Ansprüchen des Arbeitnehmers als Neumasseverbindlichkeiten gemäß § 209 Abs. 2 Nr.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hogan Lovells
    Authors:
    Reimo Richarz
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 862
    • Page 863
    • Page 864
    • Page 865
    • Current page 866
    • Page 867
    • Page 868
    • Page 869
    • Page 870
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days