Already at the beginning of the Corona crisis in March 2020, the legislator decided on various insolvency law measures to mitigate the consequences of the Corona pandemic for the Austrian economy. Since the Corona Pandemic still has far-reaching economic consequences for businesses and entrepreneurs, including even potential insolvency, the legislator has now adopted further measures in the area of insolvency law.
When does insolvency occur and what is to be done?
The Australian government has taken swift action to enact new legislation that significantly changes the insolvency laws relevant to all business as a result of the ongoing developments related to COVID-19.
In brief
Simplified Insolvency Programme (“SIP”)
In episode 3 of our Business Rehabilitation Spotlight Series, we will discuss on the most crucial stage for creditors in a business rehabilitation proceeding, which is the “Debt Repayment Application.” According to Section 90/26 of Thai’s Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (A.D.
This article was first published in International Corporate Rescue.
In an important affirmation of the rights and duties of a creditors’ committee, Bankruptcy Judge David T. Thuma of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Mexico has confirmed that a bankruptcy court may confer derivative standing on a committee to assert estate claims if a debtor in possession declines to assert them.[1]
INTRODUCTION
Recently, the Hon’ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has passed an order reiterating that once a resolution plan is approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC), the successful resolution applicant cannot be permitted to be withdraw its plan.
RELEVANT FACTS
In Caron and Seidlitz v Jahani and McInerney in their capacity as liquidators of Courtenay House Pty Ltd (in liq) & Courtenay House Capital Trading Group Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2),[1] the New South Wales Court of Appeal was faced with what it described as the ‘classic insolvency conundrum’: how to distribute funds to investors as equally and as fairly as possible where the funds have
In a judgment delivered on 14 October 2020, Mr. Justice McDonald declined to confirm the appointment of an examiner to New Look Retailers (Ireland) Ltd (New Look).
Facts
In Cant v Mad Brothers Earthmoving [2020] VSCA 198, the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria has clarified the application of the unfair preference regime in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to payments made by third parties at the direction of a debtor to its creditors. In short, a payment to a creditor by a third party at the direction of the debtor will not be ‘from’ the debtor unless the payment diminishes the assets available to the debtor’s other creditors.
Background