Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Supreme Court settles the law on ‘Certified copies’ for filing appeal against NCLT Orders
    2024-10-30

    Recently, in State Bank of India v. India Power Corporation Ltd., Civil Appeal 10424 of 2024, the Hon’ble Supreme Court adjudicated upon the issue of certified copy of Order that is filed along with the appeal. 

    The Hon’ble Supreme Court analysed several provisions of NCLT Rules and NCLAT Rules and held as follows:

    i) Both the certified copy submitted free of cost as well as the certified copy which is made available on payment of cost are treated as “certified copies” for the purpose of Rule 50 of NCLT Rules.

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Due diligence, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Madhav Kanoria , Surabhi Khattar
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
    Third Circuit Confirms that An All Assets Lien Does Not Extend to Commercial Tort Claims Unless the Claim is Specifically Described
    2024-10-30

    In re Main Street Business Funding, LLC, No. 23-2430 (3d Cir. Sept. 5, 2024) (Ambro, J.), the Third Circuit confirmed that an all-assets lien that extends to after-acquired property does not extend to a borrower’s commercial tort claims unless described with sufficient particularity under the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”). The court also confirmed that commercial tort claims can constitute proceeds of collateral, but that the commercial tort claims here did not constitute proceeds of the loan at issue in the case.

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Loeb & Loeb LLP, Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
    Authors:
    Bethany D. Simmons , Noah Weingarten
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Loeb & Loeb LLP
    From Opioids to Opt-Outs: Nonconsensual Third-Party Releases and the Aftermath of Purdue
    2024-10-28

    On June 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court released its 5-4 opinion in connection with the bankruptcy case of Purdue Pharma L.P. (“Purdue”). Over a vigorous dissent authored by Justice Kavanaugh, a narrow majority of the Supreme Court held that the Bankruptcy Code does not permit chapter 11 plans of reorganization to provide for non-consensual releases of non-debtors outside of the asbestos context.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Proskauer Rose LLP, Mediation, US Congress, Congress, Supreme Court of the United States, Pharmaceuticals
    Authors:
    Paul V. Possinger , Elliot R. Stevens
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Proskauer Rose LLP
    Court of Appeal clarifies rights of purchasers of partially completed tiny homes on insolvency
    2024-10-22

    Last week, the Court of Appeal clarified the rights of purchasers of partially completed tiny homes following the builder's insolvency.[1] The High Court ruled last year[

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Russell McVeagh, Insolvency, Fair Trading Act 1986 (New Zealand)
    Authors:
    Jeremy Upson
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Russell McVeagh
    D&O Policy Coverage: Specificity Matters in Bankruptcy Context
    2024-10-21

    A recent decision by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas in In re Walker County Hospital Corporation serves as an important reminder to clients that are purchasing or renewing directors and officers (“D&O”) insurance coverage that the “Insured versus Insured” exclusion must contain the broadest possible exceptions for claims brought against directors and officers following a bankruptcy filing. Without the specific policy language, current and former directors and officers may be exposed to personal liability.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Proskauer Rose LLP, Healthcare
    Authors:
    Charles A. Dale , Nathan R Lander
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Proskauer Rose LLP
    Ashurst Restructuring Roundup
    2024-10-21

    Pooling Orders: Use of Property in a Joint Business

    Morgan v McMillan Investment Holdings Pty Ltd [2024] HCA 33("McMillan")

    "Where two or more related companies have engaged in a common business enterprise and are being wound up in insolvency, it may be appropriate in certain circumstances for the separate entities of the companies to be disregarded so that they are wound up together as if they were the one company." Harmer Report [854]

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ashurst, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Richard Fisher
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Ashurst
    Dealing with concurrent insolvency processes in different jurisdictions
    2024-10-21

    A recent decision of the Court of Session has found that a Scottish administration can be declared as ancillary to an insolvency process in another jurisdiction. This means that the insolvency proceedings in one jurisdiction are considered as the main insolvency proceedings, while the ancillary proceedings in the other jurisdiction are restricted to dealing with the company's assets located there.

    Background

    Filed under:
    Luxembourg, United Kingdom, Scotland, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Morton Fraser MacRoberts, Insolvency, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Jennifer Andrew
    Location:
    Luxembourg, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Morton Fraser MacRoberts
    TGIF 18 October 2024 - When might a court appoint a provisional liquidator?
    2024-10-18

    The Federal Court in Hema Maps Pty Ltd v HemaX Digital Pty Ltd, in the matter of HemaX Digital Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1127, appointed a provisional liquidator to preserve the status quo until the determination of a winding up application. This winding up application was due to a deadlock and an irreparable breakdown in relations between shareholders, and mismanagement of the company.

    Key Takeaways

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Liquidator (law), Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Michelle Dean
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Podular Homes: Court of Appeal unanimously overturns High Court decision on equitable liens in liquidation
    2024-10-18

    In a judgment issued yesterday (Francis v Gross [2024] NZCA 528), the Court of Appeal unanimously overturned the controversial High Court decision in Francis v Gross [2023] NZHC 1107 and held that purchasers of partly constructed modular buildings (pods) did not have equitable liens (at all, and especially not in priority to secured creditors) over those pods.

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Buddle Findlay
    Authors:
    Bridie McKinnon , David Broadmore , Kelly Paterson , Luke Sizer , Olly Peers , Scott Abel , Scott Barker , Cora Morrison , Mace Gorringe
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Buddle Findlay
    Key Characteristics of Distressed M&A in Malaysia
    2024-10-16

    A distressed merger and acquisition (“M&A”) is essentially a sub-category of a conventional M&A, which involves sales of shares or assets of companies that are in financial turmoil and these companies are being placed under administration, receivership and/or liquidation. Due to the unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic, distressed M&A transactions have become more common in recent years with companies in financial and operational distress looking to dispose of their assets to better manage high illiquidity as well as reducing over-indebtedness risk.

    Filed under:
    Malaysia, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Adnan Sundra & Low, Liquidation, Due diligence, Receivership
    Authors:
    Putri Norlisa Najib , Chioh Jia Chiam
    Location:
    Malaysia
    Firm:
    Adnan Sundra & Low

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 28
    • Page 29
    • Page 30
    • Page 31
    • Current page 32
    • Page 33
    • Page 34
    • Page 35
    • Page 36
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days