Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Good-faith Chapter 11 filing determination defeats fiduciary duty breach claim
    2008-08-01

    For the third time in as many years, the Delaware Chancery Court has handed down an important ruling interpreting the interaction between federal bankruptcy law and Delaware corporate law. The thorny question this time was whether a bankruptcy court’s determination that the directors of a corporation acted in good faith when they authorized a chapter 11 filing precluded a subsequent claim that the directors breached their fiduciary duties by doing so. The Delaware Chancery Court concluded that it did, ruling in Nelson v.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Breach of contract, Fiduciary, Debt, Good faith, Balance sheet, Bad faith, Line of credit, Secured creditor, Collateral estoppel, Delaware Court of Chancery, United States bankruptcy court, Chief executive officer
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Parties other than landlords have standing to prevent assignment of a tenant's lease in bankruptcy
    2007-07-02

    When a retail business becomes a debtor in bankruptcy, it often decides to trim its operations by closing some of its retail stores. This strategy inevitably leaves the debtor with unnecessary leases. Instead of simply rejecting the leases, retail debtors often assume the agreements and assign them to other entities. The assumption and assignment of the unnecessary leases may allow a debtor to avoid potentially significant rejection damage claims from landlords.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Retail, Debtor, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Covenant (law), Standing (law), Legal burden of proof, Default (finance), Investment company, Walgreens, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Delaware court finds "cause" to limit credit-bid to facilitate bankruptcy auction
    2014-03-31

    In In re Fisker Automotive Holdings, Inc., 2014 BL 13998 (Bankr. D. Del. Jan. 17, 2014), leave to app. denied, 2014 BL 33749 (D. Del. Feb. 7, 2014), certification denied, 2014 BL 37766 (D. Del. Feb. 12, 2014), a Delaware bankruptcy court limited a creditor's ability to credit bid its debt in connection with the sale of a hybrid car manufacturer's assets.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Debt, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Ben Rosenblum
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Sovereign debt update- October 3, 2013
    2013-10-03

    On June 24, 2013, Argentina filed a petition asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review a ruling handed down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on October 26, 2012 (see NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of Argentina, 699 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2012)) upholding a lower-court order enjoining Argentina from making payments on restructured defaulted debt without making comparable payments to holdout bondholders. On July 26, 2013, the French government filed an amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) brief supporting Argentina’s petition. 

    Filed under:
    Argentina, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Public, Jones Day, Bond (finance), Debt, Default (finance), Second Circuit
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    Argentina, USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    To rank or not to rank: the UK Supreme Court decision in Lehman/Nortel
    2013-07-25

    In a much-awaited judgment, the UK Supreme Court has decided that the liability of a company in administration or liquidation to contribute to an under-funded pension fund following a Financial Support Direction or a Contribution Notice is a provable debt ranking equally with other unsecured creditors. Crucially, it is not an expense of the administration or liquidation which would cause it to rank ahead of all creditors (except fixed charge holders) and even the administrator's or liquidator's own remuneration.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Defined benefit pension plan, The Pensions Regulator
    Authors:
    Michael Rutstein
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    The year in bankruptcy: 2012
    2013-02-04

    December 2012 marked the fifth anniversary of the beginning of the Great Recession, which officially began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009 (at least in the U.S.). Five years down the road, the U.S. economy is undeniably on the road to recovery, with unemployment down to 7.8 percent from a high of 10.2 percent in October 2009, a significant drop in mortgage-foreclosure rates, and a housing market strengthened by the lowest mortgage rates in history. Even so, the recovery is shaky.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Mortgage-backed security, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (USA)
    Authors:
    Charles M. Oellermann , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Two recent cases test legality of consent payments and exit consents under English law
    2012-09-18

    The ongoing global financial crisis has resulted in a number of debt restructuring transactions as a result of companies being unable to meet with their debt obligations. In distressed situations, issuers typically seek investor consent to amend existing terms and conditions, often to relax covenants, reschedule payments, limit events of default and remove restrictions on raising further capital.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Debt, Debt restructuring
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    The rationale against substantive consolidation of nondebtor entities: Florida on the front line
    2012-04-13

    On January 10, 2012, a Florida bankruptcy court ruled in In re Pearlman, 462 B.R. 849 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2012), that substantive consolidation is purely a bankruptcy remedy and that it accordingly did not have the power to consolidate the estate of a debtor in bankruptcy with the assets and affairs of a nondebtor. In so ruling, the court staked out a position on a contentious issue that has created a widening rift among bankruptcy and appellate courts regarding the scope of a bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction over nondebtor entities.

    Filed under:
    USA, Florida, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Debtor, United States bankruptcy court, Eleventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Dara R. Levinson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    PBGC issues final PPA regulation on terminating plans in bankruptcy
    2011-08-18

    On June 13, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC") released a final rule that, in most cases, will reduce the amount of pension benefits guaranteed under the agency's single-employer insurance program when a pension plan is terminated in a bankruptcy case. The rule will also decrease the amount of pension benefits given priority in bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Retirement, Vesting, Subsidy, Disability, Sponsor (commercial), Pension Protection Act 2006 (USA), Title IV of the US Code, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    The U.S. federal judiciary
    2011-04-30

    U.S. federal courts have frequently been referred to as the “guardians of the Constitution.” Under Article III of the Constitution, federal judges are appointed for life by the U.S. president with the approval of the Senate. They can be removed from office only through impeachment and conviction by Congress. The first bill considered by the U.S. Senate—the Judiciary Act of 1789—divided the U.S. into what eventually became 12 judicial “circuits.” In addition, the court system is divided geographically into 94 “districts” throughout the U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, US Constitution, Article III US Constitution, Article I US Constitution, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 2953
    • Page 2954
    • Page 2955
    • Page 2956
    • Current page 2957
    • Page 2958
    • Page 2959
    • Page 2960
    • Page 2961
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days