Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Middle East Insights
    2020-02-10

    The UAE has pioneered a new insolvency regime for individuals or natural persons with the issuance of the stand-alone Insolvency Law No. 19 of 2019 (Insolvency Law), which has come to effect as of 30 November 2019.

    The Insolvency Law is intended to provide sufficient protections to natural or civil persons who are facing financial distress and are unable to settle their debts, unlike the UAE Bankruptcy Law which regulates commercial companies and individuals considered as traders under the Commercial Transactions Code.

    Filed under:
    United Arab Emirates, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Baker McKenzie, Debtor, Liquidation
    Authors:
    Habib Al Mulla , Mazen Boustany , Amir Mohd Yousuf Al Khaja , Ali Dakhlallah
    Location:
    United Arab Emirates
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    To stay or not to stay? Stay and suspension of enforcement proceedings in cross border insolvencies
    2016-12-09

    This week’s TGIF considers Tai-Soo Suk v Hanjin Shopping Co Ltd [2016] FCA 1404 in which the Court was required to determine the scope of a stay arising under the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency.

    BACKGROUND

    A Korean shipping company was subject to ‘rehabilitation’ proceedings in Korea. Rehabilitation proceedings seek to ‘rehabilitate’ insolvent debtors by restructuring their debt pursuant to a rehabilitation plan approved by the creditors and the Rehabilitation Court.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Debtor, Debt, Liquidation, Admiralty law, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), UNCITRAL, Federal Court of Australia
    Authors:
    David Abernethy , Kirsty Sutherland , Mark Wilks , Matthew Critchley , Sam Delaney , Estelle Blewett , Michelle Dean
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Non-party creditor ordered to pay portion of liquidators’ legal costs
    2022-05-27

    This week’s TGIF considers In the matter of Spitfire Corporation Limited (in liquidation) and Aspirio Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2022] NSWSC 579 in which liquidators sought an order that a non-party creditor pay their legal costs for seeking directions from the Court.

    Key Takeaways

    Filed under:
    Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Liquidation, Federal Court of Australia, New South Wales Supreme Court
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Setting aside DOCAs and exercising the casting vote
    2016-08-05

    This week’s TGIF considers Britax Childcare Pty Ltd, in the matter of Infa Products Pty Ltd v Infa Products Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) [2016] FCA 848 which considers setting aside a DOCA and the administrator’s casting vote.

    FACTS OF THIS CASE

    After complex litigation with Britax, Infa Products lost the case and as a direct consequence, appointed administrators.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Breach of contract, Board of directors, Deed, Liquidation, Voting, Liquidator (law), Prejudice, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    David Abernethy , Kirsty Sutherland , Mark Wilks , Matthew Critchley
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Can oppression relief still be extracted in liquidation?
    2022-05-06

    This week’s TGIF considers an interlocutory decision of Ball J in the NSW Supreme Court in Aqua Botanical Beverages (Australia) Pty Ltd v Botanical Water Technologies Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 435, in which the Court dismissed an application to add an oppression claim where the company went into liquidation after commencing proceedings.

    Key Takeaways

    Filed under:
    Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Patents, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), High Court of Australia, New South Wales Supreme Court
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Australian Corporations Act not beholden to Chapter 11
    2016-07-15

    This week’s TGIF considers Legend International Holdings Inc (In Liquidation) v Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Ltd & Kisan International Trading FZE [2016] VSCA 151 in which it was held that s 581 does not prohibit a winding up order where Chapter 11 proceedings are on foot.

    What happened?

    Filed under:
    Australia, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Bankruptcy, Liquidation, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    David Abernethy , Kirsty Sutherland , Mark Wilks , Matthew Critchley
    Location:
    Australia, USA
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    TGIF 22 October 2021 - Submitted for your approval: Entry into post-liquidation agreements
    2021-10-22

    This week’s TGIF considers a recent decision of the Federal Court of Australia in Re Aviation 3030 Pty Ltd (in liq) [2021] FCA 1244 on section 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) and approval of a liquidator’s proposal to enter into a settlement agreement with obligations that extend beyond three months.

    Key Takeaways

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Deed, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Federal Court of Australia
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    The best of times, the worst of times
    2016-06-07

    The recent decision of the New South Wales Supreme Court in Independent Contractor Services (Aust) Pty Limited ACN 119 186 971 (in liquidation) (no 2) [2016] NSWSC 106 found that the statutory scheme of priority does not apply to realisations from circulating trust assets. This decision has potentially profound impacts for both employees and secured creditors in the context of both liquidations and receiverships.

    A summary of the case

    Filed under:
    Australia, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Wage, Beneficiary, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Australian Taxation Office, Trustee
    Authors:
    Matthew Critchley , Haley Aprile
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Liquidating a former trustee: what to do when there is no power to sell the assets
    2021-10-08

    This week’s TGIF looks at In the matter of Gary John Anderson in his capacity as liquidator of G & G Contractors Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) [2021] FCA 1185, the latest of a line of Federal Court decisions confirming the approach to be taken by liquidators of trustee companies that have ceased to be trustees as a result of going into liquidation.

    Key Takeaways

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Asset management, Debt relief, Liquidation, Secured creditor, Liquidator (law), Creditors' rights, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Federal Court of Australia, Trustee
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    A sign for unfunded liquidators: what you need to know about assigning a cause of action
    2016-05-20

    This week’s TGIF examines the NSW Supreme Court decision In the Matter of Kevin Jacobsen Pty Limited (in liq) [2016] NSWSC 538 which considered a challenge to an application under s 477(2B) to assign a cause of action.

    WHAT HAPPENED?

    On 10 August 2015, the liquidators of Kevin Jacobsen Pty Limited (in liquidation) (KJPL) applied to the NSW Supreme Court for:

    Filed under:
    Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), New South Wales Supreme Court
    Authors:
    David Abernethy , Kirsty Sutherland , Mark Wilks , Matthew Critchley
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 277
    • Page 278
    • Page 279
    • Page 280
    • Current page 281
    • Page 282
    • Page 283
    • Page 284
    • Page 285
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days