Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Autodis: a surgical restructuring à la française
    2009-07-30

    The recent restructuring of Autodis, a French car parts company, is a perfect illustration of the positive consequences of the reform of the French bankruptcy code in effect since February 15, 2009. The combined use of the French conciliation procedure for the operating company and the French safeguard procedures for the holding companies were agreed upon between the debtor and its creditors pursuant to the first pre-pack agreement executed in France.

    Background

    Filed under:
    France, Insolvency & Restructuring, Jones Day, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Credit (finance), Debtor, Debt, Investment banking, Leveraged buyout, Write-off, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Laurent Assaya , Frédéric Gros
    Location:
    France
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    The new UK insolvency regime for investment firms
    2011-08-24

    In this DechertOnPoint, we summarise HM Treasury’s work to establish effective resolution arrangements for investment banks and firms, which resulted in the introduction of a special administration regime (“SAR”) earlier this year.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dechert LLP, Investment banking, Investment company, HM Treasury (UK)
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dechert LLP
    Resolution arrangements for investment banks: HM Treasury consultation
    2010-01-20

    HM Treasury has published a consultation paper setting out tentative proposals for changes to resolution arrangements for investment banks.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, Public consultations, Investment banking, HM Treasury (UK)
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
    MF Global UK enters Special Administration Regime
    2011-11-03

    MF Global UK Limited In Special Administration

    The Financial Services Authority (“FSA”) has confirmed that MF Global UK Limited (“MF Global UK”) has entered the Special Administration Regime created under the Investment Bank Special Administration Regulations 2011 (“Regulations”).1 MF Global UK is the first investment bank to enter the Special Administration Regime. The decision to apply for special administration was initiated by the board of MF Global UK.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Security (finance), Investment banking, Bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, Beneficial interest, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), US Department of the Treasury, Lehman Brothers, FSA, KPMG, Bank of England
    Authors:
    Nick Shiren , Assia Damianova , Alix Prentice
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    Japanese and Singaporean investors capitalizing on U.S. investment opportunities
    2011-06-06

    © 2011 Bloomberg Finance L.P. All rights reserved. Originally published by Bloomberg Finance L.P. in the Vol. 4, No. 6 edition of the Bloomberg Law Reports—Asia Pacific Law. Reprinted with permission. Bloomberg Law Reports® is a registered trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P.

    Filed under:
    Japan, Singapore, USA, Banking, Capital Markets, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Troutman Pepper, Foreign direct investment, Credit (finance), Security (finance), Market liquidity, Subprime lending, Investment banking, Economy, Balance sheet, Distressed securities, Brokerage firm
    Authors:
    Todd A. Feinsmith
    Location:
    Japan, Singapore, USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Bankruptcy court validates sale process in Lehman’s multi-billion-dollar ‘windfall’ suit against Barclays Capital - decision highlights extraordinary burden required to overturn a section 363 bankruptcy sale
    2011-03-07

    In a long-awaited decision released on February 22, 2011, Judge James M. Peck of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York ruled in favor of Barclays Capital in Lehman Brothers Holding Inc.’s multi-billion-dollar lawsuit arising out of the sale of Lehman’s investment banking and brokerage assets, which occurred in September of 2008.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Bankruptcy, Security (finance), Board of directors, Investment banking, Systemic risk, Brokerage firm, Title 11 of the US Code, Barclays, Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Leon R. Barson , John Henry Schanne, II
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Improvements to the Investment Bank Special Administration Regime
    2017-01-13

    The Investment Bank Special Administration Regime (SAR) was introduced in 2011 in response to difficulties faced in the Lehman Brothers administration. Following a review of the regime by Peter Bloxham in 2014, and a Government consultation in 2016, the Treasury has introduced draft regulations to improve the regime - The Investment Bank (Amendment of Definition) and Special Administration (Amendment) Regulations 2017.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, DLA Piper, Investment banking
    Authors:
    Chris Parker
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    DLA Piper
    New York Bankruptcy Court Saves Investment Bankers’ Transaction Fees
    2016-12-23

    “Transaction fees are part of the standard, negotiated base compensation for the investment banker,” held the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York on Dec. 16, 2016. In re Relativity Fashion, LLC, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 4339, *10 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2016) (Wiles, B.J.). The court denied objections to the transaction fees sought by two investment bankers, P and H, ruling that the objecting parties (a fee examiner, the debtor and a secured lender) had no right under Bankruptcy Code (“Code”) § 328(a) to challenge the transaction fees. Id. at *25.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Investment banking
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    UK Special Administration Regime
    2011-11-03

    The UK Financial Services Authority (“FSA”) confirmed on 31 Oct. 2011 that MF Global UK Limited (“MF Global UK”) will be subject to the new Special Administration Regime (“SAR”).[1] This is the first time that the new regime, set out in The Investment Bank Special Administration Regulations 2011 (“SAR Regulations”)[2] has been invoked.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Futures contract, Investment banking, Best practice, Bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, Pro rata, Banking Act 2009 (UK), HM Treasury (UK), International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers, FSA, Bank of England
    Authors:
    Lawrence V. Gelber
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Seventh Circuit denies fees to breaching DIP lender in re Arlington Hospitality, Inc.
    2011-04-13

    The Seventh Circuit affirmed a district court’s ruling that a debtor-in-possession (“DIP”) lender had breached its financing agreement, barring its claim for commitment and funding fees from the DIP. Arlington LF, LLC v. Arlington Hospitality, Inc., No. 09-3560, 2011 WL 727981, *9 (7th Cir. March 3, 2011), aff’g No. 08 C 5098, 2011 WL 3055350 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 18, 2009). Although the DIP itself had also breached the agreement, that breach was not, in the court’s view, effective until after the lender had already “walked away.” Id. at *6.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Leisure & Tourism, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Condition precedent, Debtor, Interim order, Breach of contract, Interest, Investment banking, Default (finance), Line of credit, Subsidiary, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook , Karen S. Park
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Current page 8
    • Page 9
    • Page 10
    • Page 11
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days