Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Foreign Debtor With U.S. Dollar-Denominated Debt Eligible for Chapter 15
    2016-02-01

    In December 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held as a matter of first impression in Drawbridge Special Opportunities Fund LP v. Barnet (In re Barnet), 737 F.3d 238 (2d Cir. 2013), that section 109(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, which requires a debtor “under this title” to have a domicile, a place of business, or property in the U.S., applies in cases under chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Debtor, Second Circuit
    Authors:
    Veerle Roovers , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Italian Bankruptcy Law reform emphasizes flexibility for borrowers, active role for creditors
    2015-08-25

    During the last few years, the section of Royal Decree No. 267 of March 16, 1942 (the "Italian Bankruptcy Law") dedicated to pre-insolvency proceedings has been reformed extensively by the Italian legislature. The purpose of the reform is to provide distressed Italian entities with a more modern and flexible insolvency law system based on private rather than judicial initiative.

    Filed under:
    Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Jones Day
    Authors:
    Francesco Squerzoni
    Location:
    Italy
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    From the top in brief
    2015-05-28

    On May 4, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its first 2015 ruling in a case involving an issue of bankruptcy law. In Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank, No. 14-116, 2015 BL 129010, ___ S. Ct. ___ (May 4, 2015), the court reviewed a ruling by the First Circuit Court of Appeals that an order of a bankruptcy appellate panel affirming a bankruptcy court’s denial of confirmation of a chapter 13 plan is not a final order and therefore is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), so long as the debtor remains free to propose an amended plan. See Bullard v. Hyde Park Sav.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, SCOTUS, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Arbitrate? You Can’t Make Me! Rejection Trumps Arbitration, Says Texas Bankruptcy Court
    2022-01-13

    Overview

    Filed under:
    USA, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Authors:
    Ronit J. Berkovich
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    No Setoff Here: Third Circuit Resolves Triangular Setoff Debate Once and for All
    2021-04-03

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Authors:
    Matt Barr , Ryan C. Rolston
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    European Restructuring Watch Alert: Extension of Restrictions on Statutory Demands, Winding up and Forfeiture to 31 March 2021
    2020-12-09

    On 9 December 2020, the UK government gave businesses muchneeded breathing space with an extension of insolvency measures. 

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Coronavirus
    Authors:
    Natasha Ayres
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Fraudulent Transfer Claims Avoid State Sovereign Immunity, But Only If a Property Interest Exists Under State Law
    2020-01-31

    In a recent decision, In re Philadelphia Entertainment and Development Partners, L.P., No. 14-000255-mdc (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Dec. 31, 2019), the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania held that state sovereign immunity does not prevent bankruptcy courts from hearing fraudulent transfer claims against states.

    Filed under:
    USA, Pennsylvania, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Debtor
    Authors:
    Ronit J. Berkovich , Patrick Feeney
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Sold or Rejected? To Be or Not to Be ― Executory
    2019-04-19

    Whether a contract is executory is an often-litigated issue in bankruptcy because of the treatment afforded to such contracts. Although the Bankruptcy Code does not define the term “executory contract,” most courts follow a variation of the definition provided by Professor Vern Countryman in a 1973 law review article.

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Candace Arthur
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Comity for Croatia: S.D.N.Y. Decision in Agrokor Reinforces Respect for Foreign Rulings in Chapter 15
    2018-11-20

    In Judge Glenn’s recent lengthy decision recognizing and enforcing a restructuring plan in the chapter 15 proceedings of In re Agrokor1, a Croatian company in Croatian insolvency proceedings, he highlighted that the concept of comity – respect for rulings in other countries – remains an important U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Private Client & Offshore Services, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Debt, Voting, Comity
    Authors:
    Ronit J. Berkovich
    Location:
    Croatia, USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    When not to use a CVA: 10 lessons from recent restructurings
    2018-06-21

    2018 has been described as “the year of the CVA”, especially in the retail and casual dining sectors. Although company voluntary arrangements can be a useful tool to compromise portfolios of leasehold obligations, there are certain situations where a CVA may be unsuitable.

    1. When a full operational and/or financial restructuring is required

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Real Estate, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Authors:
    Mark Lawford , Andrew Wilkinson , Alexander Wood
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 5185
    • Page 5186
    • Page 5187
    • Page 5188
    • Current page 5189
    • Page 5190
    • Page 5191
    • Page 5192
    • Page 5193
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days