Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    TGIF 21 June 2019: Full Federal Court finds D&O insolvency exclusion does not apply, notwithstanding administration of company
    2019-06-21

    This week’s TGIF considers the decision of AIG Australia Limited v Kaboko Mining Limited [2019] FCAFC 96, in which the Full Federal Court found that an insolvency exclusion in a D&O policy did not apply to exclude claims brought against directors and officers of a company under external administration.

    What happened?

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Coal mining, Federal Court of Australia
    Authors:
    Cameron Cheetham , Mark Wilks , Craig Ensor , Felicity Healy , Kirsty Sutherland , Matthew Critchley , Michael Catchpoole , Michael Kimmins , Michelle Dean , Sam Delaney , James Lucek-Rowley
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Directions engineered: conduct justified - substantive rights not affected
    2018-12-14

    This week’s TGIF considers Re Broens Pty Limited (in liq) [2018] NSWSC 1747, in which a liquidator was held to be justified in making distributions to creditors in spite of several claims by employees for long service leave entitlements.

    What happened?

    On 19 December 2016, voluntary administrators were appointed to Broens Pty Limited (the Company). The Company supplied machinery & services to manufacturers in aerospace, rail, defence and mining industries.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Authors:
    Cameron Cheetham , Craig Ensor , Felicity Healy , Kirsty Sutherland , Mark Wilks , Matthew Critchley , Michael Catchpoole , Michael Kimmins , Michelle Dean , Sam Delaney , Estelle Blewett , David Abernethy
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Court considers independence issues relating to appointment and funding of special purpose liquidator
    2018-05-18

    This week’s TGIF considers the recent case of In the matter of Umberto Pty Ltd (in liq) [2018] FCA 541,which involved an application to appoint special purpose liquidators and to obtain the Court’s approval of their funding and legal arrangements.

    What happened?

    Filed under:
    Australia, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Liquidator (law)
    Authors:
    Cameron Cheetham , Craig Ensor , Kirsty Sutherland , Mark Wilks , Matthew Critchley , Michael Catchpoole , Sam Delaney , Estelle Blewett , Michelle Dean , David Abernethy
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    A disposition of trust property post-winding up - void or not?
    2017-12-01

    This week’s TGIF considers the decision of Simpson & Anor v Tropical Hire Pty Ltd (in liq) [2017] QCA 274 in which the Queensland Court of Appeal considered whether a disposition of property by a company after the commencement of its winding up was void

    BACKGROUND

    Mr Simpson was the sole director and shareholder of Tropical Hire Pty Ltd (company). It had operated a successful business until that business was sold in 2009. After the sale, the company did not trade.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Beneficial interest, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Queensland Supreme Court, Trustee
    Authors:
    Kirsty Sutherland , Mark Wilks , Matthew Critchley , Michael Kimmins , Rachael King , Sam Delaney , Haley Aprile
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Securing contractual rights destroys mutuality and right to claim set-off
    2017-06-27

    The recent WA Supreme Court decision of Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd v Forge Group Power Pty ltd (in Liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2017] WASC 152 illustrates the risk of relying on contractual and statutory set-offs where the counterparty has granted security to lenders in an insolvency situation.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Western Australia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Liquidation
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Liquidators vindicated in refusing to conduct public examinations using a creditor’s law firm
    2017-02-17

    This week’s TGIF considers In the matter of ACN 151 726 224 Pty Ltd (in liq) [2016] NSWSC 1801, where the Court dismissed a creditor’s application to remove liquidators who had refused to conduct public examinations of a director.

    What happened?

    On 18 November 2015, the District Court of New South Wales entered judgment against Ridley Capital Holdings Pty Limited (the Company) in the amount of $660,862.62.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    David Abernethy , Kirsty Sutherland , Mark Wilks , Matthew Critchley , Sam Delaney , Estelle Blewett , Michelle Dean
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Australian Corporations Act not beholden to Chapter 11
    2016-07-15

    This week’s TGIF considers Legend International Holdings Inc (In Liquidation) v Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Ltd & Kisan International Trading FZE [2016] VSCA 151 in which it was held that s 581 does not prohibit a winding up order where Chapter 11 proceedings are on foot.

    What happened?

    Filed under:
    Australia, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Bankruptcy, Liquidation, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    David Abernethy , Kirsty Sutherland , Mark Wilks , Matthew Critchley
    Location:
    Australia, USA
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    NSW court finds that section 556 priorities do not apply to trust assets
    2016-03-04

    BACKGROUND

    The statutory order of priority as it relates to a superannuation guarantee charge liability was considered in the New South Wales Supreme Court proceeding In the matter of Independent Contractor Services (Aust) Pty Limited ACN 119 186 971 (in liquidation) (No 2)[2016] NSWSC 106.

    Filed under:
    Australia, New South Wales, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Authors:
    David Abernethy , Kirsty Sutherland , Mark Wilks , Matthew Critchley
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Priority creditors - to pay or not to pay?
    2015-07-17

    Background

    In Re CMI Industrial Pty Ltd (in liq); Byrne & Ors v CMI Limited [2015] QSC 96, liquidators sought directions as to whether they were required to pay trading profits made by the receivers to priority creditors under s433 of the Corporations Act.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Queensland, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Authors:
    David Abernethy , Kirsty Sutherland , Mark Wilks , Matthew Critchley
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    The power of receivers to administer trust property under a debenture
    2014-12-05

    The Federal Court has recently handed down a decision that clarifies the power of receivers to administer trust property under a debenture. In Benton, in the matter of Mackay Rural Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2014] FCA 1285, the Federal Court confirmed that section 420 of the Corporations Act 2001 (“the Act”) confers upon receivers a power to dispose of trust property, provided that this is necessary for the purpose for which they have been appointed.

    FACTS

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Authors:
    David Abernethy , Kirsty Sutherland , Mark Wilks , Michael Kimmins
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 4978
    • Page 4979
    • Page 4980
    • Page 4981
    • Current page 4982
    • Page 4983
    • Page 4984
    • Page 4985
    • Page 4986
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days