A recent Court of Appeal decision held that receivers are statutorily obliged to discharge preferential costs from assets available after deducting costs and expenses of a receiverirst line

The issue

In what might prove to be an important ruling, on April 12th the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware ruled that a secured creditor had, before the debtor filed bankruptcy, properly exercised an irrevocable proxy to change the management of the debtor’s subsidiary. The Court also ruled that the creditor had not violated the automatic stay by refusing to relinquish the proxy following the bankruptcy filing. Though a clear victory for secured creditors, the Court’s ruling hinges on a well drafted proxy provision.

The Facts of the Case

A members voluntary winding up (MVWU) is implemented in circumstances where the company’s members no longer wish to retain the company’s structure because its existence is no longer required or useful. It is only available if the company in question is solvent.

A MVWU is the only way to fully wind up the affairs of a solvent company. All outstanding creditors are paid in full, and any surplus assets are distributed to its members. A MVWU also ensures that the interests of the company’s members are protected while the company structure is dismantled.

There are many cases about the appointment of administrators, not so many about terminating their appointment. Re Central Properties Holdings Ltd (In Administration) [2023] EWHC 829 (Ch) is one.

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York has ruled that a creditor or trustee seeking to recover a subsequent transfer under Section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code need not obtain a judgment of avoidance against the subsequent transferee before proceeding with the recovery action.

We are increasingly seeing requests from borrowers to carve-out assets from the scope of a lender's otherwise all asset English security package. Whilst there may be commercially sensible reasons for this request, lenders should be aware of the potential impact on their enforcement rights before agreeing to this.

‘If, at first, you don’t succeed, then try and try again’ is a fitting description for HMRC’s recent approach to restructuring plans, with its opposition of plans proposed by The Great Annual Savings Company (GAS) and Nasmyth Group Limited (Naysmyth).

The GAS sanction hearing (which is due to take place this week) will be the first time that HMRC has taken an active role contesting a restructuring plan at sanction following the case of Houst where the Court exercised its discretionary power to “cram down” HMRC.

There are often difficult issues encountered when the worlds of bankruptcy and probate collide. This case is a good example.

The case concerns section 283A of the Insolvency Act 1986 ("s283A") which provides that a bankruptcy trustee must deal with a bankrupt's interest in their home within three years, otherwise the property re-vests in the bankrupt on expiry of this period. It is commonly known at the "use it or lose it" provision.

A mortgage loan repurchase facility (more casually referred to as a "repo") is a financing structure commonly utilized to finance mortgage loans. These facilities are utilized by both residential and commercial mortgage loan originators and aggregators to finance mortgage loans that they originate or acquire. The structure is favored by liquidity providers in the mortgage loan finance arena due to its preferential "safe harbor" treatment under the United States Bankruptcy Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"), as further described below.

If you are a creditor who is owed money by a company that has gone into voluntary administration, you will receive reports and notifications of meetings from the voluntary administrators.  Chamberlains can advise you on your rights and what to do in this situation.  In this case update, we look at one issue that may come up in such a scenario – when more time is needed before the second meeting.