Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Objections to Bankruptcy Asset Sale Did Not Rise to Level of "Adverse Interest" Defeating Buyer's Good-Faith Status
    2023-07-26

    The finality of asset sales and other transactions in bankruptcy is an indispensable feature of U.S. bankruptcy law designed to maximize the value of a bankruptcy estate as expeditiously as possible for the benefit of all stakeholders. To promote such finality, section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code prohibits reversal or modification on appeal of an order authorizing a sale or lease to a "good-faith" purchaser or lessee unless the party challenging the sale obtains a stay pending appeal. What constitutes "good faith" has sometimes been disputed by the courts.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Paul M. Green , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    U.S. Supreme Court Bankruptcy Roundup
    2023-07-26

    Since May 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court has issued three decisions addressing or potentially impacting issues of bankruptcy law. These included rulings concerning the abrogation of sovereign immunity for Native American tribes under the Bankruptcy Code, and for instrumentalities of Puerto Rico under a similar statute enacted in 2016 allowing the Commonwealth to restructure its debts. The Court also handed down an opinion concerning a homeowner's entitlement to the surplus proceeds of a real estate tax foreclosure sale.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, US Congress, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Christopher Dipompeo , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Illinois Bankruptcy Court: Whether Dispute Is Core or Non-Core Not "Bright Line" in Determining Enforceability of Arbitration Clause
    2023-07-26

    Whether a dispute that is subject to arbitration can or must be referred to arbitration after one of the parties to a prepetition arbitration agreement files for bankruptcy has long been a source of disagreement among bankruptcy and appellate courts due to a perceived conflict between the Federal Arbitration Act and the Bankruptcy Code. The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois recently provided some useful guidance regarding this issue.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, US Congress, Federal Arbitration Act 1926 (USA), Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Liquidating Chapter 11 Plan Confirmed Despite Provision Temporarily Enjoining Litigation Against Corporate Debtors
    2023-07-26

    To prevent "trafficking in corporate shells," the Bankruptcy Code prohibits any discharge of corporate or partnership debts if the debtor is not an "individual" and, in a chapter 11 case, if the debtor proposes a liquidating chapter 11 plan contemplating the cessation of the debtor's business following confirmation.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Liquidation, Paycheck Protection Program, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Delaware Bankruptcy Court Rules that Due Diligence Is Element of Preference Claim Rather Than Basis for Affirmative Defense
    2023-07-26

    A bankruptcy trustee's ability to avoid and recover pre-bankruptcy preferential transfers is essential to preserving or augmenting the estate for the benefit of all stakeholders. In 2019, however, the Bankruptcy Code was amended to add a due diligence requirement to the Bankruptcy Code's preference avoidance provision, apparently as a way to minimize the volume of speculative and coercive preference litigation.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Due diligence, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas , Daniel J. Merrett (Dan)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Examinership protection extended to companies incorporated outside Ireland
    2023-07-25

    Mac Interiors Limited (the Company), a Northern Ireland-incorporated company, has become the first company incorporated outside the Irish State (and the EU) to have an examiner appointed under the examinership regime provided for in section 509 of the Companies Act 2014 (the 2014 Act).

    Filed under:
    Ireland, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, A&L Goodbody, Coronavirus, FTX, Insolvency Regulation (Recast) (2015/848) (EU)
    Authors:
    Michelle McLoughlin , Liam Murphy , Anne O’Neill
    Location:
    Ireland
    Firm:
    A&L Goodbody
    The Real Cause Behind Alpine Summit Energy Partners’ Bankruptcy: A Lesson on Embracing Sustainability
    2023-07-25

    In recent times, the corporate landscape has witnessed a significant shift as Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) initiatives gain traction among investor and consumer groups. Companies operating in carbon-centric industries, particularly those involved in fossil fuel extraction, are experiencing challenges in securing new funding. One such company, Nashville-based driller Alpine Summit Energy Partners, has made headlines by seeking bankruptcy protection, citing the lack of funding in the oil and gas industry due to growing ESG and sustainability concerns.

    Filed under:
    Thailand, Capital Markets, Company & Commercial, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Silk Legal, ESG, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Australian Securities and Investments Commission, European Securities and Markets Authority
    Authors:
    Dr. Paul Crosio
    Location:
    Thailand
    Firm:
    Silk Legal
    Evolving jurisprudence of homebuyers under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
    2023-07-25

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Acuity Law, Insolvency, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Souvik Ganguly , Renjith Nair , Altamash Qureshi
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Acuity Law
    Budding Woes: Navigating the Weedy Waters of Cannabis Companies in Financial Distress
    2023-07-25

    As the cannabis industry matures, there will be winners and losers. Losers lack access to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Marijuana related assets cannot be sold free and clear of liens and encumbrances via the tried and true bankruptcy section 363 sale, which leaves the loser’s creditors without the best tool to maximize the value of the loser’s assets, and deprives acquirers of a federal court order conveying assets. What’s the state of play, and what’s the alternative for the losers, their creditors, and the companies that would acquire them?

    STATE OF PLAY

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Cannabis, Insolvency, Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
    Authors:
    William J. Hanlon
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Section 9 of the IBC cannot be invoked to execute an arbitral award during the pendency of an 'appeal' under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act
    2023-07-25

    The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal at Chennai (“NCLAT”) has in M/s. KK Ropeways Limited v. M/s Billion Smiles Hospitality Private Limited1inter alia held that an arbitral award cannot be enforced under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) when a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”) has been preferred against such an award.

    Brief Facts

    Filed under:
    India, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, JSA, Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (India), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Delhi High Court, National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Farhad Sorabjee , Shanaya Cyrus Irani , Siddhesh S Pradhan , Meher J. Mistri
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    JSA

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 237
    • Page 238
    • Page 239
    • Page 240
    • Current page 241
    • Page 242
    • Page 243
    • Page 244
    • Page 245
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days