In a case brought by the liquidators, the High Court found two former directors liable for wrongful trading; that is, continuing to trade when they knew or should have known that there was no reasonable prospect of avoiding insolvency (section 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986).

In Chapter 11 cases, one of a vendor’s best shots at getting paid its pre-petition debt is being designated as a “critical vendor”.

In connection with the Zachry Holdings Chapter 11 case filed in the Southern District of Texas on May 21, 2024, the Bankruptcy Court made disturbing comments regarding treatment of critical vendors.

In a bankruptcy case, a preference action1 is often asserted pursuant to Section 547 of the Bankruptcy Code against a creditor to claw back funds paid to the creditor in the 90 days prior to the bankruptcy. While the most common defenses to a preference action are the ordinary course of business defense2, the new value defense3, and the contemporaneous exchange for new value defense4, there are other defenses that a savvy creditor should consider to reduce or even eliminate preference liability.

Key Issues

In the late 2023, the Indonesia Supreme Court (Mahkamah Agung, or “MA”) issued Circular Letter Number 3 of 2023 on the Implementation of the 2023 Supreme Court Plenary Meeting Resolution as Guidelines for the Implementation of Court Duties (“Circular 3/2023”). Circular 3/2023 provides the Supreme Court’s interpretation on several regulations which specifically focuses on how the court should enforce and implement the regulations, most notably regarding language regulations and bankruptcy.

This author—whose practice is heavily weighted toward representation of official committees in large chapter 11 cases—has previously penned articles relating to questions surrounding the permanency of an official committee.

Summer 2024 Editor: Melanie Willems IN THIS ISSUE “Seething on a jet plane” - conditions precedent and time of the essence in commercial contracts by Jack Spence 03 09 11 24 Diamonds aren’t forever: who is vicariously responsible when they have been stolen?

FRP Advisory Trading Limited won the United Kingdom's largest-ever wrongful trading claim and successfully established the first "misfeasance trading" claim against former directors of British Home Stores ("BHS"), highlighting the critical responsibilities of directors managing financially troubled company assets.

The High Court has handed down judgment against two former directors of a number of BHS group companies. The Joint Liquidators, Anthony Wright and Geoffrey Rowley (both of FRP Advisory) brought claims against Lennart Henningson and Dominic Chandler for wrongful trading, misfeasance trading and individual misfeasance.

Wrongful trading

In the case of Iskon Infra Engineering Private Limited v.

Met een recent arrest van 11 juni 2024 zorgt het hof te Brussel voor een ommekeer in het faillissementsrecht. Het hof oordeelde dat ook een hypotheek, gevestigd op initiatief van de kredietverstrekker op grond van een notariële volmacht na datum van het faillissement, tegenstelbaar is aan de boedel. Het hof gaat daarmee in tegen eerder gevestigde rechtspraak en rechtsleer, die een zeer ruime interpretatie gaf aan de artikelen XX.110 en volgende van het Wetboek Economisch Recht (WER).