Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Mexicana files for Chapter 15 relief in New York
    2010-08-06

    On August 2, 2010, Maru E. Johansen, in her capacity as the foreign representative (the “Foreign Representative”)1 in respect of Mexican insolvency proceedings regarding Compania Mexicana de Aviacion, S.A. de C.V. (“Mexicana”), filed a petition for recognition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”), commencing a case under Chapter 15 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.2 Mexicana and its affiliates operate Mexicana Airlines, Mexico’s largest airline.

    Filed under:
    Mexico, USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White & Case, Debtor, Foreclosure, Concession (contract), Debt restructuring, US House of Representatives, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Thomas E Lauria , Abraham Zylberberg , Evan C. Hollander , Richard Graham , James Cairns , Roberto J. Kampfner
    Location:
    Mexico, USA
    Firm:
    White & Case
    Abuse of power by mortgage banks
    2018-05-31

    A mortgage bank has the power to foreclose and sell the collateral if the debtor is in default. However, this power does not apply in full. There is a risk of abuse of power in this respect. The circumstances, motives and actions of the parties play a major role in this. In this situation, the interests of the mortgage bank and the debtor are diametrically opposed. The mortgage bank has an interest in claiming the outstanding claim and the debtor has an interest in maintaining his immovable property.

    Filed under:
    Netherlands, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Loyens & Loeff, Foreclosure
    Authors:
    Loesje Hoeke
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Firm:
    Loyens & Loeff
    The Netherlands remains a secured creditor-friendly jurisdiction
    2011-08-26

    Strong position of secured creditors
    Aims of preliminary bill for new Insolvency Act
    Final decision


    Strong position of secured creditors

    Filed under:
    Netherlands, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, NautaDutilh, Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Credit (finance), Debtor, Unsecured debt, Fraud, Accounts receivable, Debt, Foreclosure, Liquidation, Secured creditor, Collusion, Title retention clause
    Authors:
    Teun Struycken
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Firm:
    NautaDutilh
    Things to take into account as a secured creditor when dealing with a company in financial distress
    2009-05-20

    In cross border financing transactions, a secured creditor should be aware of Dutch law specifics when dealing with a Dutch obligor in financial distress. Below is a highlighted list of specifics for a secured creditor planning to foreclose on its security or when seeking to improve its security position.

    Improving security position

    Existing Dutch security documents typically provide for possibilities for improving the position of a secured creditor in case of an event of default.

    Getting a tighter grip on collateral

    Filed under:
    Netherlands, Insolvency & Restructuring, NautaDutilh, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Legal personality, Shareholder, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Dividends, Accounts receivable, Board of directors, Debt, Foreclosure, Default (finance), Secured creditor, Articles of association, Annual general meeting, Internal Revenue Code (USA)
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Firm:
    NautaDutilh
    New opportunities for secured lenders
    2009-12-04

    On September 23 2009 the Amsterdam District Court granted the holder of a pledge over the shares in the capital of Schoeller Arca Systems Services BV authorization for foreclosure on the pledge by way of a private sale. Foreclosure on a pledge over Dutch shares is rare. The decision introduces the possibility for a secured lender either to wipe out subordinated mezzanine debt or to implement a loan-to-own strategy.

     

    Facts

    In 2007 Schoeller Arca Systems, its parent and subsidiaries (known as the SAS Group) entered into:

    Filed under:
    Netherlands, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, NautaDutilh, Share (finance), Shareholder, Debtor, Foreclosure, Default (finance), Secured loan, Trustee
    Authors:
    Teun Struycken
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Firm:
    NautaDutilh
    Will foreign judgments on avoidance actions be recognized in Switzerland?
    2017-12-07

    Avoidance Actions – What are they?

    Debtors may be tempted to protect assets from access by a possible foreclosure. The avoidance action (also called "Pauliana") gives the bankruptcy administration, and under certain conditions the creditors, the opportunity to challenge such legal acts of the debtor. Upon approval of the actions, the assets will be foreclosed.

    Filed under:
    Switzerland, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, VISCHER AG, Bankruptcy, Foreclosure
    Authors:
    Dr. Christian Oetiker
    Location:
    Switzerland
    Firm:
    VISCHER AG
    Amendments to the Insolvency Restructuring and Foreclosure Procedures (Law No 7101)
    2018-05-17

    Introduction

    Law No 7101 on Amendments to the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law and Other Laws (“Law No 7101”) has been published in the Official Gazette dated 15 March 2018. Law No 7101 i) abolishes the postponement of bankruptcy procedures, ii) introduces a new composition procedure for insolvent companies and iii) improves secured creditors’ rights in bankruptcy.

    Lifting of Postponement of Bankruptcy

    Filed under:
    Turkey, Insolvency & Restructuring, CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hainz, Bankruptcy, Foreclosure, Debt collection
    Authors:
    Döne Yalçin , Erdem Süral
    Location:
    Turkey
    Firm:
    CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hainz
    Section 2(a)(iii) of the ISDA Master Agreement, similar clauses and insolvency
    2010-11-11

    There have been so many articles written and opinions expressed on the spate of cases on the effect of how netting provisions in over-the-counter ("OTC") derivative contracts work when a counterparty becomes in default, that you would be forgiven for being confused about the current position. Now that the dust has settled (for the time being at least), this article takes stock and seeks to make matters as straightforward as possible.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Collateral (finance), Over-the-counter (finance), Debt, Foreclosure, Default (finance), Lehman Brothers
    Authors:
    Siân C. Fellows , Paul M. Dillon
    Location:
    United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Executive Conversation: Ted Manley on Optimization
    2020-03-03

    Declining foreclosure volume has created a “new normal” in default levels, but servicers can’t get complacent. Ted Manley explains why now is the perfect time to optimize processes with talent and technology to prepare for the inevitable volume increase.

    HousingWire: What are some of the pressing issues facing servicers right now from a regulatory standpoint?

    Filed under:
    USA, Ohio, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Manley Deas Kochalski LLC, Foreclosure
    Authors:
    Theodore K. Manley
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Manley Deas Kochalski LLC
    Dealing With Dower In Kentucky
    2020-03-10

    The dower statutes in Kentucky present challenges when deciding what parties to name in a foreclosure complaint. When dower issues arise, title claims might be necessary, which means foreclosures can be delayed and court costs can increase.

    Dower is a somewhat complex right given to protect spouses who are not listed as titleholders on the deed for their homestead. Dower rights in English law date back to the Magna Carta, when widows were granted some protection from the economic hardships that occurred when their title-holding husbands died.

    Filed under:
    USA, Kentucky, Insolvency & Restructuring, Manley Deas Kochalski LLC, Foreclosure
    Authors:
    John R. Cummins
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Manley Deas Kochalski LLC

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Page 2
    • Current page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days