Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Delay penalty imposed on bankrupt estate may reach the credits prior to the new bankruptcy law
    2013-04-26

    The Superior Court of Justice (Superior Tribunal de Justiça - STJ) judged Direct Appeal n. 1.223.792 where the State of Mato Grosso do Sul sought to include the delay penalty in the classification of the credits in the bankruptcy of a company. According to the opinion announced by the Second Panel, in the case of bankruptcy declared during the validity term of Law n.

    Filed under:
    Brazil, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Machado Meyer Advogados, Bankruptcy, Ex post facto law
    Location:
    Brazil
    Firm:
    Machado Meyer Advogados
    Survival of loss carry-forwards: European Commission raises doubts regarding common market conformity of the German restructuring clause (Sec. 8c para. 1a CTA)
    2010-07-06

    Does the German restructuring clause of Sec. 8c para. 1a CTA (see our Client Alert of 10 July 2009) conform to European Community law? This will be analyzed by the European Commission which has — by circular of 24 February — announced the initiation of a formal examination procedure (Art. 108 para. 2 TFEU, former Art. 88 para. 2 of the EC Treaty). Already before completion of the formal procedure, corporations with unrestricted and restricted tax liability in Germany may face farreaching consequences.

    A. The Restructuring Clause of Sec. 8c para. 1a CTA

    Filed under:
    European Union, Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Latham & Watkins LLP, Share (finance), Shareholder, Market liquidity, Single market, Taxable income, Ex post facto law, Subsidy, State aid, Electricity generation, Pro rata, European Commission, Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Treaty of Rome, Court of Justice of the European Union
    Location:
    European Union, Germany
    Firm:
    Latham & Watkins LLP
    RRSPs in British Columbia receives legislative protection from creditors
    2008-12-23

    The British Columbia Provincial government recently passed the Economic Incentive and Stabilization Statutes Amendment Act, 2008 (the “Act”). The Act was aimed at protecting RRSPs to afford self-employed individuals the same protection from creditors as those individuals who have planned for their retirement through a registered pension plan.

    To achieve this purpose, the Act amends a number of statutes in British Columbia.

    Filed under:
    Canada, British Columbia, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Tax exemption, Ex post facto law, Debt, Retirement, Self-employment
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Taxation on corporate restructuring
    2009-05-08

    New tax rules relating to the tax treatment of certain corporate restructuring transactions are expected to be finalized soon by the PRC Ministry of Finance (“MOF”) and the State Administration of Taxation (“SAT”).

    Filed under:
    China, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Share (finance), Interest, Income tax, Ex post facto law, State Administration of Taxation (China)
    Location:
    China
    Firm:
    Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
    Restructuring privilege for the use of tax loss carry forwards for corporations incompatible with EU law
    2011-02-02

    The EU Decision

    The EU Commission has held on January 26, 2011 that the so called restructuring privilege offered by German corporate tax law, which allows corporations in a distressed financial situation to continue to set off tax loss carry forwards against future profits even if their shareholder structure has substantially changed, is incompatible with EU State Aid provisions.

    The recipients, which have applied the restructuring privilege, are now threatened with the reclaim of the tax benefits.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Trade & Customs, Mayer Brown, Share (finance), Wage, Shareholder, Market liquidity, Ex post facto law, Debt, Subsidy, State aid, Pro rata, European Commission, Federal Ministry of Finance (Germany), Court of Justice of the European Union
    Authors:
    Dr. Petra Eckl , Dr. Marco Wilhelm
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    German “restructuring tax law” under review of the European Commission
    2011-06-09

    On 26 January 2011 the European Commission declared the so-called Restructuring Clause (Sanierungsklausel) (Sec. 8c (1a) of the German Corporate Income Tax Act (CTA)) as inconsistent with EU funding guidelines. The decision of the European Commission is criticized by national experts and stresses the German economy with a hardly tolerable uncertainty as regards tax issues in restructurings.  

    Filed under:
    Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Latham & Watkins LLP, Regulatory compliance, Tax exemption, Ex post facto law, Debt, Balance sheet, Bénéfice, European Commission, Federal Ministry of Finance (Germany), Court of Justice of the European Union
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Latham & Watkins LLP
    Transactions at risk when entered into by a company in financial distress
    2009-05-20

    When doing business with a Luxembourg company in financial distress, the counterpart should be aware that certain transactions are at risk.

    Doing business with a bankrupt Luxembourg company

    A bankrupt Luxembourg company is automatically deprived from the administration of its assets. All transactions must be entered into by the receiver in bankruptcy acting in the name and on behalf of the bankrupt company.

    Filed under:
    Luxembourg, Insolvency & Restructuring, NautaDutilh, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Collateral (finance), Interest, Ex post facto law, Consideration, Debt, Due diligence, Commercial paper
    Authors:
    Thibaut Willems
    Location:
    Luxembourg
    Firm:
    NautaDutilh
    Still in the minority, 9th Circuit BAP holds that creditors may seek adequate protection retroactively
    2011-03-22

    People’s Capital and Leasing Corp. v. BIG3D, Inc. (In re BIG3D, Inc.), 438 B.R. 214 (9th Cir. BAP 2010)

    CASE SNAPSHOT

    Filed under:
    USA, Asset Finance, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Breach of contract, Ex post facto law, Bright-line rule, Secured creditor, Secured loan, Title 11 of the US Code, Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
    Authors:
    Christopher O. Rivas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    From the top: recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling
    2011-04-01

    The U.S. Supreme Court’s October 2010 Term (which extends from October 2010 to October 2011, although the Court hears argument only until June or July) officially got underway on October 4, three days after Elena Kagan was formally sworn in as the Court’s 112th Justice and one of three female Justices sitting on the Court.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Debtor, Federal Reporter, Ex post facto law, Debt, Tax deduction, Dissenting opinion, Majority opinion, Internal Revenue Service (USA), US Congress, Westlaw, Article III US Constitution, Supreme Court of the United States, Ninth Circuit
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Constructively charged with having retroactive actual notice when challenging an improperly recorded defective mortgage…wait, what?
    2015-02-17

    “Great cases…make bad law” declared Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. in his dissenting opinion in the Northern Securities antitrust case of 1904. One of the most oft-quoted phrases any aspiring lawyer will hear in law school, this maxim stands for the proposition that decisions in cases of great importance from a public or social perspective make a poor basis upon which to construct a general law. Although an otherwise innocuous adversary bankruptcy proceeding (Daren A. Messer, et al. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA (In re Messer), Adv. Pro.

    Filed under:
    USA, Ohio, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP, Ex post facto law, Constructive notice
    Authors:
    Matthew E. Moberg
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP

    Pagination

    • Current page 1
    • Page 2
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days