Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Court preserves right to sue receiver in respect of court-approved transaction
    2009-07-30

    1117387 Ontario Inc., by court order in October 2003, was placed under receivership for defaulting on payment of a mortgage. In October 2008, the Court was asked to approve the receiver’s third report and the proposed sale of the mortgaged lands. A complicating factor was that the mortgaged lands were subject to environmental contamination as a result of a neighbouring oil and gas facility.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Pollution, Surety, Debtor, Debt, Mortgage loan, Fossil fuel, Frivolous litigation, Vexatious litigation, Default (finance)
    Authors:
    David W. Mann , David LeGeyt
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    ISDA responds on investment bank resolution
    2009-07-17

    ISDA has written to Treasury on its plans to make insolvency regulations in relation to investment banks. It supports Treasury's plan to take legislative steps only if market practice and regulatory approaches do not work. It endorses the view that sophisticated counterparties should have as much flexibility as possible. It notes the interaction of any regime for investment banks with existing regimes must be clear but does not currently see a compelling case for changes to the current regime.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Capital Markets, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Investment banking, HM Treasury (UK), International Swaps and Derivatives Association
    Authors:
    Matthew Hodgson
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Restructuring distressed companies – is it time for change?
    2009-07-16

    The European High Yield Association (a trade association representing participants in the European leveraged finance market) is calling for new restructuring laws, warning that the existing regime makes it more likely that a company in financial difficulties will collapse.  

    Libby Elliott looks at the proposals, which are designed to create a formal procedure for restructuring distressed companies.  

    The need for change

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Interest, Stakeholder (corporate), Leverage (finance), Distressed securities
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Broad interpretation of “wages” under WEPPA
    2009-06-30

    The decision of the British Columbia Superior Court in Re Ted Leroy Trucking Ltd. was a result of an application for directions with respect to what amounts are properly covered by the Wage Earner Protection Program Act, S.C. 2005, c. 47 (the “WEPPA”), and the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3 (the “BIA”).

    Filed under:
    Canada, British Columbia, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Wage, Bankruptcy, Liability (financial accounting), Severance package, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    David W. Mann , David LeGeyt
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    The monitor’s power to revise claims after a claims bar date
    2009-06-30

    In Re ScoZinc Ltd., 2009 NSSC 136 the monitor appointed under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) brought a motion for directions on whether it had the authority to allow the revision of a claim after the claim’s bar date, but before the date set for the monitor to complete its assessment of claims.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Shareholder, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Debt, Stakeholder (corporate), Prejudice, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Court of Appeal of Alberta, Trustee
    Authors:
    David W. Mann , David LeGeyt
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Lender strategy in light of new pension priorities
    2009-06-04

    Recent changes to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act have given certain unpaid pension plan contributions priority over a lender’s security if the employer is bankrupt or in receivership. How can a lender monitor the debtor’s pension arrears to assess the extent of the lender’s loss of priority?

    The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act now provides that certain unpaid pension plan claims rank ahead of a lender’s security in bankruptcy or receivership proceedings. Effective July 7, 2008, sections 81.5 and 81.6 give super-priority status to:

    Filed under:
    Canada, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Liability (financial accounting), Defined benefit pension plan, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Security interest in royalty distributions survives bankruptcy of composer
    2009-06-04

    In a recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the Court rejected a bankrupt music composer’s argument that a security interest the composer had granted in royalty based distributions should be ineffective following his bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Media & Entertainment, Dentons, Royalty payment, Wage, Bankruptcy, Accounts receivable, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Jane Dietrich , Jarvis Hetu
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Stalking horses & break fees
    2009-05-29

    In Re: Nortel Networks Corp. the Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered an application for court approval of the Bidding Procedures pertaining to the sale of Nortel’s “Layer 4-7” business, as well as approval of a “Stalking Horse” bidding process.

    Prior to filing for protection under the CCAA, Nortel decided that the Layer 4-7 business should be sold. Shortly after filing, Nortel agreed to enter into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Radware for the purchase of the Layer 4-7 business (the “Purchase Agreement”).

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Stakeholder (corporate), Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Authors:
    David LeGeyt , David W. Mann
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Recognition of foreign proceedings
    2009-05-29

    Magna Enterprises Corp. (“MEC”), a foreign bankrupt corporation, brought an application for ancillary relief pursuant to s. 18.6 of the CCAA. Section 18.6 gives the court the power to “make such orders and grant such relief as it considers appropriate to facilitate, approve or implement arrangements that will result in a co-ordination of proceedings under this Act with any foreign proceeding”.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Public company, Bankruptcy, Comity, Subsidiary, Title 11 of the US Code, Delaware General Corporation Law, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    David LeGeyt , David W. Mann
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Employee super-priority under the WEPPA and the BIA: comments on Ted Leroy Trucking Ltd. and 383838 B.C. Ltd. (Re)
    2009-05-29

    The Wage Earner Protection Program Act, S.C. 2005, c. 47 (the “WEPPA”), came into force on July 7, 2008. This paper will set out the implications of the WEPPA on insolvency practice and provide a brief analysis of Ted LeRoy Trucking Ltd. and 383838 B.C. Ltd. (Re), 2009 BCSC 41 (“LeRoy Trucking”), the only reported decision regarding the WEPPA (as at the date of this paper) since the legislation came into force.

    I. Introduction to the WEPPA

    Filed under:
    Canada, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Wage, Bankruptcy, Severance package, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Trustee
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 137
    • Page 138
    • Page 139
    • Page 140
    • Current page 141
    • Page 142
    • Page 143
    • Page 144
    • Page 145
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days