Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Florida moves quickly to preserve its status as a business-friendly state
    2011-08-02

    Sometimes state legislatures react slowly to judge-made law and sometimes they move swiftly to correct perceived problems created by court rulings. Often, such rash legislative action is not well thought-out or properly drafted, making the solution worse than the fix. However, in Florida, within one legislative session, the Florida Legislature and governor considered and enacted a set of amendments to Florida's limited liability statute that hopefully will signal the business community that Florida knows how to pass laws that make sense.

    Filed under:
    USA, Florida, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Foley & Lardner LLP, Debtor, Fraud, Interest, Limited liability company, Foreclosure, Limited partnership, Dissenting opinion, Federal Trade Commission (USA), Constitutional amendment, Florida Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Mark J. Wolfson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Foley & Lardner LLP
    Decision in crucible materials requires preference claims to contain more than just recitations of the code
    2011-08-01

    Summary

    In a 12 page decision signed July 6, 2011, Judge Walrath of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court granted a motion to dismiss, holding that a complaint that sets forth only conclusory allegations parroting the statutory language of the Bankruptcy Code is insufficient. Judge Walrath’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Debtor, Debt, Constitutional amendment, Title 11 of the US Code, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (USA), Trustee, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    L. John Bird
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    PIF revisited - no right not to be diluted
    2011-10-07

    On 5 October 2011 Justice Barrett of the Supreme Court of NSW handed down a decision in Centro Retail Limited and Centro MCS Manager Limited in its capacity as Responsible Entity of the Centro Retail Trust [2011] NSWSC 1175 (“Centro”) where he found that the responsible entity of Centro Retail Trust would be justified in modifying the constitution of the trust without unitholder approval to a insert a provision permitting the issue of units at a price different to that provided for by the pre-existing provisions.

    Filed under:
    Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, King & Wood Mallesons, Retail, Security (finance), Investment funds, Market value, Net asset value, Unilateralism, Australian Securities Exchange, ING Group, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group, Constitutional amendment, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Constitution, Federal Court of Australia, New South Wales Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Brian Murphy
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    King & Wood Mallesons
    Consolidations and winding ups
    2011-06-27

    Over the past few months there have been a number of insurance portfolio transfers and a winding up of a general insurer.  Various judges of the Federal Court have considered aspects of the Insurance Act (Cth) 1973.

    Portfolio transfers

    There have been two scheme transfers of insurance portfolios from Australian branches of overseas insurers to Australian subsidiaries.  While objections to the transfers were raised, the Federal Court confirmed the schemes.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, King & Wood Mallesons, Reinsurance, Liquidation, Holding company, American International Group, Constitutional amendment, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Federal Court of Australia
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    King & Wood Mallesons
    ASIC releases regulatory guide for directors on the duty to prevent insolvent trading
    2010-08-09

    Every director of an Australian company is under a legal duty to prevent the company incurring a debt when the company is insolvent (or where that debt will cause the company to become insolvent).

    The Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC) new Regulatory Guide sets out four key principles which directors should follow to meet their obligation to prevent insolvent trading.

    The Regulatory Guide also sets out ASIC's approach to assessing whether a director has breached their duty.

    Background

    Filed under:
    Australia, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Hall & Wilcox, Security (finance), Breach of contract, Board of directors, Accounting, Debt, Balance sheet, Cashflow, Liquidator (law), European Commission, Australian Securities and Investments Commission, The Australian, Constitutional amendment, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Tony Macvean , James Morvell
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Hall & Wilcox
    Opportunities in the wake of collapsed agricultural managed investment schemes
    2010-02-17

    In brief

    Courts have recently approved a number of means by which external administrators can realise value from insolvent agricultural managed investment schemes and deal with the rights of growers and sponsor creditors:

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Public company, Liquidation, Tax deduction, Due diligence, Investment funds, Liquidator (law), Constitutional amendment
    Authors:
    Robert Nicholson , Paul Branston
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    At long last - a legislative fix for the GST payable by representatives of incapacitated entities
    2010-01-12

    It has taken 12 months, but new legislative provisions are now in place to deal with the problems for representatives of incapacitated entities arising from Logan J's decision in Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v PM Development Pty Limited [2008] FCA 1,886.

    The new provisions go beyond merely addressing the outcome of PM Developments. They also introduce new obligations for representatives of incapacitated entities as well as some concessions and protections.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Clayton Utz, Regulatory compliance, Tax credit, Good faith, Goods and services tax (Australia), Constitutional amendment
    Authors:
    Andrew Sommer
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Clayton Utz
    Liquidators’ liability for GST – draft legislation released
    2009-07-31

    Exposure draft legislation has been released which proposes amendments to the GST legislation to make it clear that liquidators and other representatives of incapacitated entities are liable for GST on transactions within the scope of their appointment.

    Date of effect

    It is proposed that the main operative provisions of the legislation have effect retrospectively from the commencement of the GST Act on 1 July 2000.

    Background

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Norton Rose Fulbright, Tax exemption, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Dividends, Tax credit, Consideration, Liquidation, Goods and services tax (Canada), Liquidator (law), Aircraft registration, Goods and services tax (Australia), Goods and Services Tax (New Zealand), Constitutional amendment, Federal Court of Australia
    Authors:
    Peter Norman
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Plans and schemes of arrangement in the British Virgin Islands
    2011-02-01

    Under the BVI Business Companies Act, 2004 (the “Act”) there are two types of court supervised arrangements.

    Filed under:
    British Virgin Islands, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ogier, Share (finance), Security (finance), Liquidator (law), Prima facie, Consolidation (business), Constitutional amendment, Companies Act
    Location:
    British Virgin Islands
    Firm:
    Ogier
    Brexit: Keep Calm and Carry On
    2016-07-01

    As the country recovers from the shock outcome of last Thursday’s Referendum, the question which Restructuring professionals must now consider is “what does Brexit mean for me?”. The truth is that nobody really knows. The Referendum decision is not legally binding on the UK Government and the process of the UK leaving the EU will only start once the UK has served formal notice on the EU pursuant to Article 50 of the Treaty on the European Union. This will start a two year negotiation period to effect Brexit.

    Filed under:
    European Union, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Public, Squire Patton Boggs, Lobbying, Brexit, Breach of contract, Climate change mitigation, Supply chain, Internal market, Tariff, Force majeure, Trade barrier, Tax efficiency, Constitutional amendment
    Authors:
    John Alderton , Caroline Castle
    Location:
    European Union, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs

    Pagination

    • Current page 1
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days