In Short

The Situation: Directors in England and Wales owe duties to the companies to which they are appointed (and may face personal liability for breaching such duties). Although the Companies Act 2006 obliges directors to maximise value for a company's shareholders, case law has suggested that directors should act in the interests of a company's creditors if a company becomes distressed.

ICC Judge Barber’s judgment in the case of Purkiss v Kennedy & ors (Re Ethos Solutions Ltd) [2022] EWHC 3098 (Ch) deals with a complex and late application for joinder and to re-amend proceedings. It was handed down following a four day hearing and weighs in at over 200 paragraphs, facts indicative of the unusual nature of the application.

On 7 December 2022, the European Commission published its proposal for a directive harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law (the Insolvency Directive).

The Insolvency Directive seeks to offer more certainty and create a common minimum standard of insolvency regimes across member states, encouraging more effective cross-border investment.

It aims to harmonise three key areas of EU insolvency law (the Insolvency Directive).

Aims law:

• the recovery of assets

• the efficiency of proceedings

Background

The Corporate Enforcement Authority (“CEA”) has issued its first information note of 2023 on the topic of the European Union (Preventative Restructuring) Regulations 2022 (the “Regulations”) which came into effect on 27 July 2022 (the “Information Note”).

If you’re thinking about tidying your corporate structure, now is the time to do it.

This Guide sets out the background of the 'solvency test' and its relevance and applicability in Guernsey. The Solvency Test Background When the solvency test was introduced in July 2008 as part of the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 (the Law), it represented a fundamental change to Guernsey's company law in relation to the maintenance of capital and solvency.

mourant.com 2021934/84097043/2 GUIDE Insolvency procedures for Guernsey companies Last reviewed: February 2023 Contents Introduction 2 Modern corporate insolvency proceedings 2 Administration 2 Liquidation 3 Voluntary liquidation 3 Compulsory liquidation 4 Scheme of arrangement 5 Statutory process 5 Three-stage mechanism 5 Approval and challenges 5 Receivership 5 The traditional procedures 6 Désastre 6 Saisie 6 Out-of-court restructurings and consensual workouts 7 Conclusion 7 Contacts 7 2 mourant.com 2021934/84097043/2 Introduction Guernsey law provides a number of ways to ensure an orderl

Recently, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT“), in the case of Dharmindra Constructions Private Limited and Anr. vs.

2016年破産倒産法の下では、企業債務者が債務の弁済ができない場合、倒産処理手続き（CIRP）が開始され、再建計画の募集により企業債務者の再生を試みます。その後、当該再生手続が失敗に終わった場合、企業債務者は清算されることになります。法は、CIRPにおいては「管財人」が企業債務者の再生と再構築に取り組み、これが失敗した場合に、清算人が企業債務者の支配者となり、企業債務者の資産を売却してその収益を分配し、解散を申請する、と定めています。清算人は、管財人は異なるいくつかの特別な権限を有しています。

R.K. Industries (Unit-II) LLP v. HR Commercials Pvt. Ltd.（R.K. Industries Case）において、最高裁判所は、企業債務者の資産の売却方法に関する清算人の商業的英断は、倒産裁判所の限定的な司法審査の対象となることを明確にしました。

Brief facts - 概要

In the current times of financial stress, a borrower seeking to renegotiate or refinance existing financing arrangements may be asked by its lender to enhance or refresh its security package through the grant of a new floating charge.

The question of whether a floating charge can be avoided due to section 245 of the Insolvency Act 1986 ("IA 1986") can arise in such a context.

Void floating charges under section 245 of the IA 1986