Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Canada Revenue Agency trumps unsecured creditors!
    2010-08-31

    In a sleight-of-hand move dexterously played by the Canada Revenue Agency ("CRA"), it managed to secure advance collection of a disputed corporate income tax debt by obtaining an ex parte jeopardy collection order after the CRA was notified of an application by the taxpayer to appoint a receiver.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, WeirFoulds LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Res judicata and issue estoppel, Debt, Ex parte, Capital punishment, Unsecured creditor, Canada Revenue Agency, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Income-Tax Act 1961 (India), Trustee, Court of Appeal for Ontario, Federal Court (Canada)
    Authors:
    Maralynne A. Monteith
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    WeirFoulds LLP
    Mind the gap: direction given for defaulting debtors in a BIA proposal
    2010-09-08

    formal proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) is a powerful alternative to bankruptcy. The benefits of a proposal for the debtor are clear: the debtor reduces its debt load and avoids bankruptcy. However, proposals are also beneficial to creditors since generally the creditor’s recovery in a proposal scenario is better than the potential recovery from a liquidation through a bankruptcy. In simple terms, upon the successful completion of a proposal, the debtor gets a “fresh start” and creditors recover more than they would in a bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Miller Thomson LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Debt, Legal burden of proof, Liquidation, Default (law), Default (finance), Bankruptcy discharge, Constitutional amendment, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Trustee
    Authors:
    Craig A. Mills , Margaret R. Sims
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    Allocating restructuring costs amongst creditors: don’t get stuck holding the bag
    2010-09-20

    An increasing number of restructuring cases involve several creditors with security over varied assets or asset classes. In such cases there is often a dispute over allocation of the costs of the reorganization. This is particularly true in failed restructurings where costs are high and realizations are low.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McMillan LLP, Costs in English law, Debtor, Holding company, Valuation (finance), Pro rata
    Authors:
    Brett Harrison
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McMillan LLP
    Inadvertent subordination under the PPSA
    2010-09-23

    Section 38 of the Ontario Personal Property Security Act (the "Act") contains an exception to the general priority scheme of the Act. It provides that a secured creditor may, in the relevant security agreement or otherwise, subordinate its security interest to any other security interest, and that such subordination will be effective according to its terms. No distinction is drawn between perfected and unperfected security interests.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Common law, Secured creditor, Personal Property Security Act 1990 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Charles Zienius
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
    Jurisdiction is in the eye of the enforcer
    2010-04-20

    If you intend to enforce a judgement in Canada, you should know that the question of the US Court’s jurisdiction will likely be determined by the Canadian Court enforcing the judgement using its own test. The grounds on which the US Court took jurisdiction will carry little weight in the eyes of the Canadian enforcing Court.

    Filed under:
    Canada, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McMillan LLP, Bankruptcy, Fraud, Summary offence, Default (finance), Capital One, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Brett Harrison , Jeffrey Levine
    Location:
    Canada, USA
    Firm:
    McMillan LLP
    Court approval of cross-border DIP financing guarantees
    2010-05-11

    InterTAN Canada Ltd (“InterTAN”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of US based Circuit City Store, Inc. (“Circuit City”), a consumer electronics retailer. In Canada, InterTAN operates retail stores under the trade name “The Source by Circuit City”. Prior to Circuit City's filing under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, InterTAN was a borrower under a syndicated credit facility between Circuit City, certain U.S. affiliates, InterTAN, Bank of America NA, as agent, and certain other loan parties (the “Secured Credit Facility”).

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Retail, Credit (finance), Surety, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Liquidation, Stakeholder (corporate), Subsidiary, Bank of America, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada)
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Alberta exempts registered savings plans from seizure
    2010-05-14

    One more province has joined the ranks of extending creditor protection to registered savings plans. Alberta’s Civil Enforcement Amendment Act came into force on October 1, 2009 (the “Act”). It applies to registered retirement savings plans (RRSPs), registered retirement income funds (RRIFs), deferred profit sharing plans (DPSPs) and registered disability savings plans (RDSPs).

    Fair Treatment

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Miller Thomson LLP, Tax exemption, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Beneficiary, Retirement, Life insurance, Investment funds, Disability, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Wendi P. Crowe
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    Representative counsel motions may impose greater costs on secured creditors than were bargained for
    2010-06-01

    The restructuring proceedings of Canwest Publishing Inc and affiliated entities (“Canwest”) has recently provided secured lenders and particularly debtor-in-possession lenders with some food for thought.

    In March of this year, four former non-unionized employees of Canwest brought a motion in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the “Court”) for the appointment of representative counsel to protect the interests of themselves and similarly situated former employees in the Canwest Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) restructuring proceedings.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Costs in English law, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Interest, Trade union, Consent, Legal burden of proof, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Evan Cobb
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
    Canadian perspective on Lehman ruling re: mutuality and set-off
    2010-06-04

    That darn Lehman Brothers bankruptcy sure is raising some interesting insolvency issues for derivatives market participants (and their lawyers of course). It’s interesting (at least for us insolvency nerds) to think about how some of those issues might play out under Canadian insolvency laws. Here are some thoughts on one of the recent cases with my Canadian spin.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Swap (finance), Debt, Liquidation, Lehman Brothers cases, Derivatives market, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Stikeman Elliott LLP
    MEGA Brands Inc.: the Canada Business Corporations Act provides an innovative approach to balance sheet restructuring and a landmark result
    2010-06-14

    On March 22, 2010, the Superior Court of Quebec approved a plan of arrangement under the Canada Business Corporations Act (the CBCA) that allowed a corporation, MEGA Brands Inc., to achieve a worldwide restructuring of its business under a corporate statute, rather than a more typical insolvency and restructuring statute like the Companies Creditors’ Arrangement Act.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Quebec, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Shareholder, Security (finance), Swap (finance), Debt, Stakeholder (corporate), Convertible bonds, Secured loan, Title 11 of the US Code, Canada Business Corporations Act 1985, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware, Quebec Superior Court
    Authors:
    Ward A. Sellers , Sandra Abitan , Audrey DeMarsico
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 132
    • Page 133
    • Page 134
    • Page 135
    • Current page 136
    • Page 137
    • Page 138
    • Page 139
    • Page 140
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days