Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Fraudulent preferences and transfers at undervalue
    2011-03-14

    TheBankruptcy and Insolvency Act, RSC 1985, c. B‐3 (the “BIA”) was recently amended to repeal the settlement and reviewable transaction sections of the Act, and replaced these sections with provisions regarding transfers under value and preferences. The aim of these new provisions is to prevent bankrupts from unfairly preferring certain creditors over others and to prevent bankrupts from transferring assets for significantly less than they are worth.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Fraud, Consideration, Legal burden of proof, Conveyancing, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Trustee
    Authors:
    Christopher J. Ramsay
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Ancillary foreign proceedings in Canada
    2009-08-31

    Lear Corporation, a Delaware corporation, its Canadian subsidiaries, and other affiliates, sought an Order under s. 18.6 of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) for a declaration that Chapter 11 proceedings in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court (New York) constituted “foreign proceedings” and for a stay of proceedings. Introduced to the CCAA in 1997 to assist with the administration of the increasing number of cross-border insolvencies, s.18.6 is aimed at increasing cooperation, comity, and coordination between courts of different jurisdictions.

    Filed under:
    Canada, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Stakeholder (corporate), Comity, Cashflow, Subsidiary, Delaware General Corporation Law, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    David W. Mann , David LeGeyt
    Location:
    Canada, USA
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Application in Canada of the U.S. doctrine of equitable subordination
    2009-02-18

    The U.S. doctrine of equitable subordination (as now set out in the U.S. Bankruptcy Code) allows a U.S. court to subordinate all or part of a creditor's claim to the claims of other creditors if the creditor has engaged in inequitable conduct that gives the creditor an unfair advantage or is injurious to the other creditors. Will the Canadian courts apply the doctrine?

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Secured creditor, Title 11 of the US Code, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of Canada, Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Sell the assets, sell the name – change your PPSA registration to get the proceeds!
    2008-04-03

    The Ontario Court of Appeal recently held that Royal Bank of Canada ("RBC") was unperfected as against a trustee in bankruptcy (the "Trustee"), because RBC failed to comply with section 48(3) of the Personal Property Security Act (Ontario) (the "PPSA") by failing to file a financing change statement to reflect a change of the debtor’s name after assets of the debtor were sold by a court appointed interim receiver.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Secured creditor, Unsecured creditor, Personal Property Security Act 1990 (Canada), Royal Bank of Canada, Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Trustee
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Recognising foreign insolvency proceedings arising in jurisdictions other than the place of incorporation
    2016-10-20

    Overview

    The central question in the case of Re Opti-Medix Ltd (in liquidation) and another matter [2016] SGHC 108 (Opti-Medix) was whether insolvency proceedings in a jurisdiction other than the place of incorporation could be recognised by the Singapore court.

    Ex parte applications were made for (a) the recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings and (b) the appointment of a foreign bankruptcy trustee, in respect of two companies (the Companies).

    Background facts

    Filed under:
    South Africa, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Bankruptcy
    Authors:
    Herman Jeremiah
    Location:
    South Africa
    Firm:
    Dentons Rodyk
    Section 163 examinations
    2011-03-14

    Section 163 gives the trustee the broad power to examine the bankrupt, any person who would be reasonably thought to know the affairs of the bankrupt, or any person who is or has been an agent, clerk, officer, director or employee with respect to the bankrupt or the bankrupt’s dealings. Essentially, this section gives the trustee the power to examine any person who is capable of providing information on the bankrupt.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Confidentiality, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Solicitor, Secured creditor, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Trustee
    Authors:
    Christopher J. Ramsay
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    In recognizing a foreign insolvency proceeding Canadian court grants stay of proceedings in Canada
    2009-07-30

    Courts have broad discretion to grant orders under s. 18.6 of the CCAA in cases where there is no formal Canadian bankruptcy filing.

    Magna Entertainment Corp. (“MEC”) is a publicly-traded Delaware corporation with its head office in Ontario. On March 5, 2009, MEC and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries filed for Chapter 11 protection in the United States. Although MEC’s management is based in Canada and MEC has assets in Canada, MEC’s main interests and majority presence are in the U.S.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Comity, Subsidiary, Delaware General Corporation Law, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    David W. Mann , David LeGeyt
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Superintendent’s Levy deducted from repayment of bank’s mortgage
    2009-01-30

    In Seeley (Trustee of) v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (2008), the Bankruptcy Court determined that the Superintendent’s Levy was payable on the amount paid to a secured creditor by a Trustee in bankruptcy.The bankrupt made an assignment into bankruptcy. He owned a cabin which was mortgaged to the Bank.

    The Trustee sent the Bank three notices requiring it to file proof of its security. The Bank did not respond.The cabin was sold and subsequently the Bank filed a Proof of Claim in the bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Dividends, Interest, Debt, Mortgage loan, Secured creditor, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), United States bankruptcy court, Trustee
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Corn producers not able to rely on their supplier rights under the BIA
    2008-02-28

    In Meunerie B.L. inc., Re (2007), EYB 2007-126274, 2007 QCCA 1601 (Que. C.A.) affirming (2006), EYB 2006-109274, 2006 QCCS 4914 (Que. S.C.) Meunerie B.L. Inc. (“Meunerie”) made an assignment in accordance with the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”). At the time of bankruptcy Meunerie was a mill which processed corn purchased from corn producers. Corn that was delivered to Meunerie was stored on site in silos

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Quebec Court of Appeal, Trustee
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Foreign Credit Institutions Entitled to Bankrupt Russian Companies Under a Simplified Procedure
    2016-04-11

    In early 2015, credit institutions gained the right to initiate the bankruptcy of their debtors according to a simplified procedure – i.e., without a court decision ordering the recovery of debt.

    Filed under:
    Russia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Court of cassation
    Authors:
    Mikhail Ivanov
    Location:
    Russia
    Firm:
    Dentons

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 709
    • Page 710
    • Page 711
    • Page 712
    • Current page 713
    • Page 714
    • Page 715
    • Page 716
    • Page 717
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days