Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Foreclosure on UCC collateral speeds lender’s takeover of troubled real estate
    2010-05-26

    A recent bankruptcy New York court decision1 highlights a less commonly used option for lenders to take control of troubled real estate projects. The lender obtained relief from the automatic stay to foreclose on membership interests pledged to secure its mezzanine loan instead of foreclosing on its mortgage against the underlying real property.  

    Here is the case, and what lenders can learn from it.  

    The Case

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Herrick Feinstein LLP, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Injunction, Hedge funds, Mortgage loan, Foreclosure, Condominium, Default (finance), Secured loan, Uniform Commercial Code (USA), United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Stephen Selbst , Paul Rubin
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Herrick Feinstein LLP
    Motions for omnibus objections to claims against Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and associated debtors filed with the US Bankruptcy Court
    2010-05-26

    On 18 May 2010, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and its associated debtors (together, the "Debtors") filed a further six omnibus objections to claims filed in their Chapter 11 proceedings with the US Bankruptcy Court (the "Objections"). The Objections contain orders prepared by the Debtors on behalf of the US Bankruptcy Court which, if granted, will enable the Debtors to disallow and expunge the claims identified in each of the Objections from the register of claims.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mayer Brown, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Injunction, Liability (financial accounting), Estoppel, Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Ryan C. Troupe
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    U.S. district court affirms Delaware Bankruptcy Court decision in SemCrude prohibiting triangular setoff
    2010-05-25

    The United States District Court for the District of Delaware recently affirmed a Bankruptcy Court decision that invalidated the use by creditors of so-called “triangular”, or non-mutual, setoffs in which obligations are offset among not only the parties to a bilateral contract but also their affiliates. In re SemCrude, L.P., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42477 (D. Del.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Swap (finance), Debt, Lehman Brothers cases, Chevron Corporation, Title 11 of the US Code, Delaware Supreme Court, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Authors:
    Mark C. Ellenberg
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    North American Petroleum Corporation files for bankruptcy in Delaware following dispute with Enterra Energy
    2010-05-30

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Natural gas, Accounts receivable, Market liquidity, Debt, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    State or federal court when evicting a bankrupt tenant?
    2010-06-03

    Many landlords are very familiar with provisions of the United States Bankruptcy Code dealing with assumption and rejection of leases. However, the particular consequences of lease rejection may not be as well known. For example, once a lease is rejected or deemed to be rejected, a landlord may not know its rights with respect to regaining possession of the leased premises. A recent case from a Florida bankruptcy court shed some light on this issue when it held that after a debtor has rejected a lease, the tenant must surrender the premises to the landlord.

    Filed under:
    USA, Florida, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Dykema Gossett PLLC, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Limited liability company, Vacated judgment, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Robert D. Nachman , Neil T. Neumark
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dykema Gossett PLLC
    Specialty Products Holding Corp. seeks bankruptcy protection in response to asbestos litigation
    2010-06-02

    Introduction

    On May 31, 2010, Specialty Products Holding Corp ("SPHC" or the "Debtor"), filed for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. This post is one of two posts regarding the SPHC bankruptcy. The first post will look at the Debtor's businesses and events leading up to the bankruptcy filing, while a second post will look at how SPHC intends to deal with the large volume of asbestos claims that forced it to file for bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Product Regulation & Liability, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Holding company, Subsidiary, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Courts restrict secured creditors' right to credit bid at bankruptcy sales
    2010-06-01

    The Third Circuit recently held that a bankruptcy court may confirm a Chapter 11 plan that includes a sale of assets in which secured creditors are not permitted to “credit bid” for the assets. In re Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC, 599 F.3d 298 (3d Cir. 2010). In that case, the debtors in possession, companies that own and operate the Philadelphia Inquirer and Philadelphia Daily News, moved the bankruptcy court to approve bid procedures for an auction of the debtors’ assets. Id. at 302.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Frost Brown Todd LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Federal Reporter, Debt, Secured creditor, Secured loan, US Congress, US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Darren A. Craig
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Frost Brown Todd LLP
    Chem Rx files for bankruptcy hoping to either reorganize or conduct a 363 sale of assets
    2010-05-31

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Market liquidity, Marketing, Debt, Investment banking, Line of credit, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Landsource Communities Development commences preference actions
    2010-06-10

    Recently, the LandSource Creditor Litigation Liquidating Trust (the "Litigation Trust"), commenced various avoidance actions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. This post will look briefly at the events leading to the commencement of this bankruptcy proceeding. Further, the post will look at some of the issues that confronted the Debtor during the reorganization process.

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Unsecured debt, Debt, Economy, Liquidation, Debtor in possession, Barclays, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Implications for asbestos-related future claims: in re Grossman's Inc.
    2010-06-09

    INTRODUCTION

    Filed under:
    USA, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Insolvency & Restructuring, Legal Practice, Litigation, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Federal Reporter, Due process, Negligence, Warranty, Precondition, Bankruptcy discharge, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Eleventh Circuit, Third Circuit, Fourth Circuit
    Authors:
    Robert B. Millner , Carole Neville , Christopher D. Soper
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dentons

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 254
    • Page 255
    • Page 256
    • Page 257
    • Current page 258
    • Page 259
    • Page 260
    • Page 261
    • Page 262
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days