In the recent Federal Court case of Abdul Rashid bin Mohamad Isa v PTT International Trading Pte Ltd [2024] MLJU 1518, the core issue that arose in the appeal was whether the withdrawal of the Creditor’s Petition constituted a termination of the entire bankruptcy proceedings including the Bankruptcy Notice served on the Judgment Debtor
BACKGROUND FACTS OF THE CASE
When doing business with a Luxembourg company in financial distress, the counterpart should be aware that certain transactions are at risk.
Doing business with a bankrupt Luxembourg company
A bankrupt Luxembourg company is automatically deprived from the administration of its assets. All transactions must be entered into by the receiver in bankruptcy acting in the name and on behalf of the bankrupt company.
On 9 October 2012, a bill proposal was introduced to the Luxembourg Parliament providing for a right to claim back "intangible" and non-fungible movable assets from a bankrupt company.
According to the explanatory memorandum, the bill proposal is intended to allow the recovery of data from a bankrupt provider of distance IT services or cloud computing solutions. Once passed, the law will provide greater certainty as to the consequences of the bankruptcy of a cloud computing provider on the data in its possession.
"Separable" Assets
On 21 November 2016, the Bankruptcy (Amendment) Bill 2016 (Bill) was tabled in Parliament. The Bill will rename the Bankruptcy Act 1967 to the Insolvency Act 1967 and will have important implications, in particular to financial institutions and corporates whose loans / debts are secured by personal guarantees, once their amendments are incorporated in the existing Bankruptcy Act 1967 (Act) and are passed and in force.
According to article 16 of the Mexican Commercial Insolvency Law (in Spanish “Ley de Concursos Mercantiles”), a foreign company can be declared under insolvency in Mexico, but only regarding the branches and goods located in Mexican territory.
Yet, if a cross border insolvency proceeding has been initiated abroad, the Mexican Courts may dictate several remedies (provisionally) and also to execute the orders issued within a foreign insolvency proceeding, regarding the company’s goods and properties located in México, in order to protect the estate and creditor’s rights.
1. Introduction
The First Chamber of the Supreme Court recently handed down a decision dealing with the constitutionality of one of the timeframes set by the Bankruptcy Law for filing a proof of claim in bankruptcy proceedings.