Use the Lexology Navigator tool to compare the answers in this article with those from other jurisdictions.

Trends and regulatory climate

TrendsWhat is the current state of the lending market in your jurisdiction and have any new trends emerged over the last 12 months?Austria

Use the Lexology Navigator tool to compare the answers in this article with those from other jurisdictions.

Asset classes used as collateral for security

Use the Lexology Navigator tol to compare the answers in this article with those from other jurisdictions.

Enforcement

Use the Lexology Navigator tool to compare the answers in this article with those from other jurisdictions.

Structuring a lending transaction

Recent case law from the Supreme Court(1) demonstrates once again that lenders can be held liable by creditors of an insolvent borrower under certain conditions. In particular, a lender may be held liable where it has significant influence over the borrower's management. However, only a few cases have met the necessary level of influence. The case discussed below shows that total disregard of this risk can have severe consequences for lenders.

The Austrian “Bundesgesetz über Sanierungsmaßnahmen für  die HYPO ALPE-ADRIA-BANK INTERNATIONAL AG” (HaaSanG), published on 31 July 2014 in the Austrian Federal Law Gazette and implemented in August 2014 by the Austrian government, paved the way for the establishment of Heta Asset Resolution AG (Heta) as a wind-down vehicle to assume and manage large parts of the assets of the failed Austrian bank, Hypo Alpe-Adria Bank international AG (HAA).

The first bank resolution under the new European bank resolution regime is currently taking place in Austria: the Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA), the official government regulator for banks, funds and financial institutions, is busy with the resolution of HETA Asset Resolution AG (HETA - formerly Hypo Alpe-Adria Bank International AG).

Legal Status  

Hypo Group Alpe Adria AG, an Austrian banking group, was nationalized by the Austrian government in 2009 in order to avert a bank collapse. The Austrian province of Carinthia owned the bank until 2007 and the guarantees given by Carinthia for the bank’s debt still amount to several times its annual budget, which has made the winding-down process more complicated because sharing the losses with bondholders would lead to significant claims against Carinthia.

The conundrum evolves