Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Living wills
    2011-09-20

    On September 13th, the FDIC voted to approve a final rule to be issued jointly with the Federal Reserve Board that would implement Section 165(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act. That provision requires bank holding companies with assets of $50 billion or more and companies designated as systemic by the Financial Stability Oversight Council to report periodically to the FDIC and the Federal Reserve the company's plan for its rapid and orderly resolution in the event of material financial distress or failure. The Federal Reserve will consider whether to adopt the rule shortly.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Winston & Strawn LLP, Board of directors, Federal Reserve Board, Depository institution, Bank holding company, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Federal Reserve (USA), Financial Stability Oversight Council, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    Subrogation to ‘claims’ entitles subrogee to vote on behalf of itself and subrogor
    2011-09-14

    Avondale Gateway Center Entitlement, LLC v. National Bank of Arizona, et al. (In re Avondale Gateway Center Entitlement, LLC), 2011 WL 1376997 (D. Ariz. Apr. 12, 2011)

    CASE SNAPSHOT

    Filed under:
    USA, Arizona, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Limited liability company, Debt, Voting, Capital punishment, Title 11 of the US Code, Arizona Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Christopher O. Rivas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    FDIC launches Investor Match Program
    2011-09-12

    On September 7th, the FDIC announced the launch of a new program to encourage small investors and asset managers to partner with larger investors to participate in the FDIC's structured transaction sales for loans and other assets from failed banks. The Investor Match Program will help to facilitate partnerships in order to bring together sources of capital and expertise. Participants in the program will use a customized database to identify potential collaborations, which will be identified at the sole discretion of the participating firms.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Winston & Strawn LLP, Asset management, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    It's important to record the trustee's deed promptly after foreclosure
    2011-09-13

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California recently held that the filing of a bankruptcy petition by a borrower can void a trustee sale even where the petition is filed after the trustee sale, so long as the borrower files the petition before the execution of the trustee's deed upon sale. In re: Gonzales 2011 WL3328508 (Bkrtcy. C.D.Cal. August 1, 2011).

    Filed under:
    USA, California, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Option (finance), Foreclosure, Deed, Default (finance), Capital punishment, Deed of trust (real estate), Secured loan, California Civil Code, Trustee, US District Court for Central District of California, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
    Unable to show ‘indubitable equivalence’ where property appraisals diverge significantly
    2011-09-14

    In re Prosperity Park, LLC, 2011 WL 1878210 (Bankr. W.D.N.C. May 17, 2011)  

    CASE SNAPSHOT

    Filed under:
    USA, North Carolina, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Collateral (finance), Discrimination, Limited liability company, Debt, Legal burden of proof, Liquidation, Deed of trust (real estate), Secured loan
    Authors:
    Ann E. Pille
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Seventh Circuit: failure to file proof of claim does not foreclose your rights
    2011-08-30

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Federal Reporter, Budget, Debt, Mortgage loan, Foreclosure, Secured creditor, In rem jurisdiction, US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Anita Wong
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Dodd-Frank: the disorderly orderly
    2011-09-02

    The FDIC Board approved a final rule on the orderly liquidation process, which was the culmination of a series of rulemaking efforts begun earlier this year. The rule implements several provisions of Title II of the Dodd-Frank Act. Title II establishes an “orderly liquidation authority” (the “OLA”) through which the FDIC can be appointed as receiver and liquidate a covered financial company, such as a bank holding company, whose failure threatens to have serious adverse effects on financial stability in the U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Liquidation, Bank holding company, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA)
    Authors:
    Dwight Smith , Alexandra Steinberg Barrage
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Morrison & Foerster LLP
    Federal Reserve Board proposes phase-in period for SLHC reporting
    2011-08-29

    On August 22nd, the Federal Reserve Board proposed a two-year phase-in period for most savings and loan holding companies ("SLHCs") to file Federal Reserve regulatory reports with the Board and an exemption for some SLHCs from initially filing Federal Reserve regulatory reports. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, supervisory and rulemaking authority for SLHCs and their non-depository subsidiaries was transferred from the OTS to the Board. The Board previously sought comment on whether to require SLHCs to submit the same reports as bank holding companies.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Winston & Strawn LLP, Tax exemption, Federal Reserve Board, Holding company, Bank holding company, Subsidiary, Federal Reserve (USA), Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    Foreclosure sale of non-debtor's property voided as violation of automatic stay
    2011-08-22

    Lenders and mortgage holders may be surprised to learn that a New York bankruptcy court voided the foreclosure sale of non-debtor property where the debtor filed for bankruptcy with no legitimate intent to reorganize. In a case of first impression, In re Ebadi1 addresses a common scenario: a foreclosure action against multiple parties, including a borrower not in bankruptcy and a guarantor in bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herrick Feinstein LLP, Punitive damages, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Debt, Mortgage loan, Foreclosure, Vacated judgment, Default (finance), United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Paul Rubin
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Herrick Feinstein LLP
    Bankruptcy Court approves procedures for determining allowed amounts of structured securities claims
    2011-08-12

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, overseeing the bankruptcy cases of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“LBHI”) and its affiliated debtors (collectively, the “Debtors”), entered an order on Aug.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Security (finance), Consent, Voting, Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Lawrence V. Gelber
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 362
    • Page 363
    • Page 364
    • Page 365
    • Current page 366
    • Page 367
    • Page 368
    • Page 369
    • Page 370
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days