Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    COVID-19 compliance forecast: What comes next for key industries?
    2020-06-22

    Samantha Gilbert speaks to compliance leaders from the healthcare, financial services, insurance, IT and commercial sectors on what to expect from the new “business as usual” and enforcement. Conduct reviews, increased regulatory scrutiny and long-term digitisation are some key issues for compliance teams to prepare for.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Canada, European Union, Global, OECD, United Kingdom, USA, Banking, Company & Commercial, Competition & Antitrust, Compliance Management, Employment & Labor, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Internet & Social Media, IT & Data Protection, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Lexology PRO, Contractual term, Regulatory compliance, Data security, Data breach, Class action, Mobile app, Misconduct, Supply chain, Money laundering, Due diligence, Force majeure, Contract management, Anti-corruption, Data sharing, Voluntary compliance, Cyberattack, Risk assessment, Personal data, Cyber insurance, Cybersecurity, Risk management, Data protection, Third-party risk, Crisis management, Coronavirus, Coronavirus compliance, OECD, AXA, Lloyds Bank, Chief compliance officer
    Authors:
    Samantha Neil
    Location:
    Australia, Canada, European Union, Global, OECD, United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Lexology PRO
    Non-disclosure of corporate re-organisation and breach of warranty (again)
    2010-11-10

    By a judgment handed down on 26 October 2010 in Sugar Hut Group Ltd & Ors v Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) Plc & Ors [2010] EWHC 2636 (Comm), Mr Justice Burton in the Commercial Court held that insurers were entitled to avoid, for a material non-disclosure of a corporate re-organisation, a policy which could otherwise have covered losses arising from a fire at the premises of the insureds.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Shareholder, Breach of contract, Reinsurance, Public limited company, Non-disclosure agreement, Warranty, Underwriting, Subsidiary, AXA, High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Commercial Court (England and Wales)
    Authors:
    Alexander Oddy , Greig Anderson
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Allanfield Property Insurance Services v Aviva and AXA: Judge considers whether premiums held by insolvent broker belong to customers or insurer
    2016-01-11

    http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2015/3721.html

    Two insurance intermediaries entered into administration. Although heavily insolvent, they had significant funds held in client accounts. Those funds represented insurance premiums collected from customers but not yet paid on to the insurers. The issue therefore arose as to whether the insurers, the customers or the unsecured creditors of the intermediaries were entitled to those funds.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Clyde & Co LLP, AXA, Aviva
    Authors:
    Nigel Brook
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Clyde & Co LLP
    Allanfield Property Insurance Services v Aviva and AXA: Judge considers whether premiums held by insolvent broker belong to customers or insurer
    2016-01-11

    http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2015/3721.html

    Two insurance intermediaries entered into administration. Although heavily insolvent, they had significant funds held in client accounts. Those funds represented insurance premiums collected from customers but not yet paid on to the insurers. The issue therefore arose as to whether the insurers, the customers or the unsecured creditors of the intermediaries were entitled to those funds.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Clyde & Co LLP, AXA, Aviva
    Authors:
    Nigel Brook
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Clyde & Co LLP
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days