In the English case of Derby& Co v Weldon (No3 and 4) (1990) Ch 65, the Court of Appeal held unequivocally that a court can order a defendant’s assets to be frozen even if they are situated outside of the jurisdiction. However what is vital to be established in such circumstances is:
Welcome to the inaugural edition of 'Going concerns', in which we strive to bring you the latest updates on restructuring and insolvency law. For this issue, we focus on Singapore and provide:
Victoria, Samnuggur and Titaghur
The Scottish Court of Session considers the interaction of Indian insolvency proceedings for three Scottish Companies that had also been placed into Administration in Scotland.
Background
The Victoria Jute Company Limited ("Victoria"), The Samnuggur Jute Factory Limited ("Samnuggur") and Titaghur plc ("Titaghur") were all incorporated in Scotland, but had been carrying out their business in India.
ISSUE FOUR 2017 FUNDING IN FOCUS Are Asian arbitral centres going to surpass the old continent? PwC Damages: an expert’s view Who wins, where and why? Stockholm, Sweden, Scandinavia Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer 60 seconds Q&A with Erin Miller Rankin Brick Court Chambers Competition damages litigation in London pre- and post- Brexit Wilberforce Chambers Getting at trust assets and piercing the corporate veil Disputes funding for corporates CONTENTS Are Asian arbitral centres going to surpass the old continent?
On 17 July 2014, the regulation creating the European Account Preservation Order ("EAPO") came into force. This regulation will serve as an alternative to domestic remedies and relates to the freezing of bank accounts across participating EU Member States. The EAPO Regulation will be applicable from 18 January 2017. It will automatically apply to all Member States except the UK and Denmark which have opted out of the EAPO; therefore, it will not apply to assets located in those countries.
What's New?
We ended 2019 wondering whether Brexit would remain as allconsuming as it had been the previous three years. Cue the COVID-19 pandemic. We hope this newsletter finds you, your colleagues and your family in good health and adjusted to the new 'normal'. We look back at the first three months of 2020, unforgettable in more ways than one, and how current developments may impact our future.
The UK government’s response to COVID-19 has already taken the economy into new territory, and whilst measures put in place may delay or alter the approach of companies seeking insolvency-based protections, a large number of (contentious) restructurings and insolvencies is inevitable.
We anticipate three phases, each of which creates various risks:
(i) The current phase, during which companies are able to take advantage of government support, or relaxed laws or rules around insolvencies, to continue to operate during the COVID-19 lockdown.
Directors of English companies that entered into insolvency proceedings in Germany could be liable to reimburse the company under German law for payments made after the company became insolvent.
This is a two-part article on ways to restructure debt taken up by a German company. The first part looks at financings under English law, the second refers to German law-governed debt.
Part I – Financings governed by English law (restructuring through schemes of arrangement)
In recent years a number of German companies such as Tele Columbus, Rodenstock and Primacom have used English law scheme of arrangements to restructure their debt.
An element of the restructuring toolbox
English schemes of arrangement under the Companies Act 2006 (Schemes) have been increasingly used by non-English companies as a powerful tool to restructure their financial indebtedness. Recent prominent examples of German companies that have utilized Schemes to cramdown non-consenting or “holdout” creditors in order to restructure the company’s balance sheet include TeleColumbus, Rodenstock and Primacom.
There are several reasons for this trend: