Against the backdrop of Hong Kong's emergence from the pandemic and the government's efforts to entice tourists and investors back, there arises a question as to whether the government might consider reviving the corporate rescue bill. Implementing a framework for debt restructuring and negotiations with creditors would help prevent liquidations, which often result in additional job losses and contribute to further economic decline.

Under the Euroclear or Clearstream system, companies which issue so-called “global notes” do not have direct contractual relationship(s) with the ultimate beneficial investors in those notes. Rather, the company’s books will show only one registered global note, and only one registered holder of the global note holding the note on behalf of the investors.

The Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) offsetting mechanism will be cancelled on 1 May 2025

By then, Hong Kong employers can no longer offset severance and long service payments owed to employees against MPF benefits derived from employers' contributions. The Hong Kong government decided in July 2023 not to implement the "Specialized Savings Account Scheme" proposed in 2018 which would require employers to create dedicated savings accounts and make 1% contributions to prepare for the abolishment of such MPF offsetting arrangement. 

强制性公积金（强积金）对冲安排将于 2025 年 5 月 1 日取消

届时，香港雇主将不能再以雇主供款所得的强积金利益抵销需向雇员支付的遣散费 和长期服务金。香港政府于 2023 年 7 月决定不实施 2018 年提出的“专项储蓄户 口计划”，该计划要求雇主设立专门的储蓄户口并缴纳 1%的供款，为取消该强积 金对冲安排做好准备。

行政成本过高

经估算，于专项储蓄户口计划运行初期，每年行政成本约 1.5 亿港元，30 年后将增至 6 亿港 元。成本高昂的原因是繁重的行政工作，包括：

(1) 规管及确保现时 30 多万名需为强积金强制供款的雇主成功开立储蓄户口；

(2) 每月收取供款；

(3) 核实及审批提款申请；及

(4) 处理未能预见的情况。

此外，预计该计划的程序将极其复杂，因 此无法避免外判服务机构处理该计划日常 运作的成本。

最后，雇主还需承担遵守该计划的相关行 政职责。 

破产欠薪保障基金

The recent judgment in City Gardens Ltd v DOK82 Ltd [2023] EWHC 1149 (Ch) serves as a useful reminder of the extent of, and principles governing, the English court’s jurisdiction to wind up a company on the basis of inability to pay its debts.

Background

City Gardens Limited (C), and DOK82 Ltd (D), had entered into a “memorandum of understanding” (MoU) in relation to a significant debt owed by D to C.

In the case of Re Guangdong Overseas Construction Corporation [2023] HKCFI 1340, the Honourable Madam Justice Linda Chan recognized and provided assistance to a mainland China appointed administrator over a mainland China company in liquidation despite the administrator's application being outside the scope of the insolvency cooperation mechanism between Hong Kong and mainland China courts. The Hong Kong court affirmed that its jurisdiction to recognize and assist office-holders appointed by a court of another jurisdiction derives from common law.

Introduction

The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal (CFA) has recently in Re Guy Kwok-Hung Lam^[1] confirmed that, where a dispute in respect of a petition debt is subject to an exclusive jurisdiction clause (EJC), the Hong Kong court should gen

In the landmark judgment by Linda Chan J in Re Gatecoin Ltd (in liquidation) [2023] HKCFI 914, the Court of First Instance held that cryptocurrencies were property under Hong Kong law capable of being held for distribution to creditors (or beneficiaries if they were trust assets) for the purposes of administrating an insolvent estate. In this article, the authors consider the Court’s ruling and its wider implications for the insolvency regime in Hong Kong, focusing on fraud claims and reviewable transactions in the cryptocurrency context.

香港高等法院于近日作出标志性判决（HCA 1269/2021）（“本案”），肯定了维好协议、流动性资金支持等增信措施的可执行性，支持了某中资离岸债券的信托人向债券的维好提供方申偿的债券本金、利息及其他支出。

特别地，上述债券在本案被告破产重组程序启动前已逾期，本案被告本应根据维好安排进行资金偿付却未履行其在维好安排下的该等偿付义务。

一、案情简介

1.  争议背景:

本案原告为本次债券的信托人，代表债券投资人的利益（“原告”）。本案被告为替本次债券提供维好协议、流动性资金支持等增信措施的境内主体（“被告”）。