Key point

In a financial restructuring, creditors have to pay attention that the restructuring undertakings of the insolvent company are likely to be achieved.

Background

Under German insolvency law, the insolvency administrator may challenge a transaction if an insolvent company intended to disadvantage its creditors (and the other party knew that intention). The German Supreme Court presumes such intention if a company knew about its impending illiquidity.

Facts

This is a two-part article on ways to restructure debt taken up by a German company. The first part looks at financings under English law, the second refers to German law-governed debt.

Part I – Financings governed by English law (restructuring through schemes of arrangement)

In recent years a number of German companies such as Tele Columbus, Rodenstock and Primacom have used English law scheme of arrangements to restructure their debt.

An element of the restructuring toolbox

Videology Inc and it's UK subsidiary, Videology Limited (the "Company") applied to the English court for their US Chapter 11 proceedings to be recognised as "foreign main proceedings" under Article 17 of the UNCITRAL Model Law of Cross-Border Insolvency (the "Model Law") and for an administration moratorium under the Article 21 of the Model Law. The Videology group had secured an agreement with an interested party to buy its business and assets.

Decision

The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) has recently rendered a decision in a dispute between the Portuguese investor Dan Cake and Hungary. The dispute was based on a bilateral investment agreement between Portugal and Hungary concluded in 1992. In its decision, the Tribunal declared Hungary liable for the breach of the investment agreement. The Tribunal will decide on the amount of damages at a later date.

Dan Cake versus Hungary

Key points

• Automatic stays on proceedings are imposed by Article 20 of the UNCITRAL Model Law (and mirrored in s.130(2) IA 1986)
• The case reinforces the principle that automatic stays are designed to avoid the unnecessary expenditure of assets otherwise available for distribution amongst creditors

The facts

As we mentioned before, the Greek debt crisis has reached the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof).

In the world of international trade, insolvency with cross-border elements is inevitable. Unlike many jurisdictions, there is no statutory mechanism in Hong Kong to deal with cross-border insolvency, and the Court's recent conflicting decisions added greater confusion as to Hong Kong's approach.

Following the EU Insolvency Regulation Nr. 2015/848 (the “Regulation”) coming into force, the Hungarian legislator has accordingly amended the Hungarian Insolvency Code (the “Code”) with effect from 28 October 2017.

Although no insolvency law-specific regulatory changes have been introduced in Hungary due to COVID-19, the Hungarian Government has adopted numerous extraordinary measures that may have a profound effect on how companies deal with solvency and liquidity related problems under the new circumstances.

Firstly, although the bankruptcy procedure is to be initiated by the management of the company, the prior approval of the main body of the company (ie the shareholders) is required. Due to the curfew currently in effect, in-person shareholders’ meetings are mostly prohibited.

Hungarian insolvency law provides for a right of the liquidator to terminate, with immediate effect, contracts concluded by the debtor, or – in case neither of the parties rendered any services – to rescind the contract. This applies even in cases where contractual provisions or relevant legislation would otherwise prohibit the termination of the given contract.