Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Innovative solutions must be applied to fronting insurance and collateral problems in bankruptcy
    2013-03-06

    Large businesses and organizations that self-insure their legally mandated insurance requirements often use “fronting” policies in which the policyholder must reimburse insurers for all losses and expenses paid on the policyholder’s behalf. These policyholders must furnish substantial collateral to secure repayment, typically, enough to pay many years’ worth of actual and anticipated claims. This can amount to hundreds of millions of dollars, and typically exacerbates cash flow and balance sheet problems for policyholders under financial stress.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Bankruptcy, Collateral (finance), Balance sheet
    Authors:
    Andrew S. Zimmerman , Nicole Stefanelli
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lowenstein Sandler LLP
    Secured lender’s full credit bid barred later recovery from guarantors
    2013-03-06

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held on Feb. 28, 2013, that a secured lender’s full credit bid for a Chapter 11 debtor’s assets at a bankruptcy court sale barred any later recovery from the debtor’s guarantors. In re Spillman Development Group, Ltd., ___ F.3d ___, 2013WL 757648 (5th Cir. 2/28/13). A “credit bid” allows a creditor to “offset its [undisputed] claim against the purchase price,” a right explicitly granted by Bankruptcy Code (“Code”) § 363(k). 3 Collier, Bankruptcy, ¶ 363.06[10], at 363-59 (16th rev. ed. 2010).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Surety, Debtor, Tortious interference, Secured loan, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Adam C. Harris , Lawrence V. Gelber , Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    When “loan to own” becomes “own a loan” – how a recent Fifth Circuit decision rejecting the artificial impairment doctrine increases risks for distressed real estate investors
    2013-03-06

    Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code provides debtors with a number of tools to restructure comprehensively their debts and other liabilities as well as immediate protection from secured and unsecured creditors.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Ropes & Gray LLP
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Court finds investment advisor’s payments to customers are not exempt from avoidance under section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code
    2013-03-07

    FCStone, a New York-based commodities brokerage firm, was recently ordered to return a transfer of $15.6 million to the bankruptcy estate of Sentinel Management Group. Approximately $1.1 million of this amount constituted a prepetition transfer of proceeds the debtor obtained from the sale of securities, which proceeds the debtor distributed to a certain segment of its customers, including FCStone.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Bankruptcy, Collateral (finance), Security (finance), Commodity
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    Tribal corporate bankruptcy petition raises issues of first impression for bankruptcy court
    2013-03-07

    On March 4, 2013, ‘SA’ NYU WA, Inc., a tribally-chartered corporation wholly owned by the Hualapai Indian Tribe, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Arizona. This is a very important case for tribes and any party conducting business with tribes because the petition will raise a question of first impression for the Bankruptcy Court. The Bankruptcy Court will have to decide whether a tribal corporation is eligible to be a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Christine L. Swanick , Wilda Wahpepah
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
    An insider’s guide to evading absolute priority? Seventh Circuit: new value competition requirements apply to insiders
    2013-03-07

    In Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases, the absolute priority rule requires a debtor’s creditors be paid in full before equity investors receive any value. However, existing equity investors occasionally seek to invest new money in the plan of reorganization process and argue that such investment justifies retention of equity in the reorganized company; equity which otherwise would pass to impaired creditors.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mintz, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Secured creditor, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Eric R. Blythe
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Weathering the storm: Fifth Circuit permits artificial impairment of unsecured trade creditors to cram down plan acceptance on secured lender
    2013-03-07

    Bankruptcy Code § 1129(a)(10) provides that in order for a plan proponent to “cram down” - i.e., force acceptance of - a plan of reorganization on a dissenting class of creditors, at least one impaired class of creditors must vote in favor of the plan. Because a plan is often not accepted by all classes entitled to vote, the ability to procure at least one impaired, accepting class in order to cram down a dissenting class is essential in achieving plan confirmation.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Haynes and Boone LLP, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Interest, Secured loan, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Stephen Pezanosky , Trevor Hoffmann , John D. Beck , Yonit Caplow
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Haynes and Boone LLP
    Bankruptcy court denies reinsurers’ motion to determine debt owed to them is nondischargeable
    2013-03-05

    A Massachusetts bankruptcy court denied the motion for summary judgment of reinsurers Trenwick America Reinsurance Corporation and Unum Life Insurance Company, which sought to determine that debtor Malcom C. Swasey’s debt owed them was nondischargeable in bankruptcy. The underlying dispute centered on the reinsurers’ claim that Swasey and companies he controlled, IRC, Inc. and IRC Re, engaged in fraud and breached a contract under which IRC Re was to provide retrocessional coverage in connection with a workers’ compensation program.

    Filed under:
    USA, Massachusetts, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Jorden Burt LLP, Reinsurance, Collateral estoppel, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Ben Seessel
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jorden Burt LLP
    Recovery from dissolved corporation's liability insurer barred by foreign survival statute
    2013-02-26

    The recent case ofGreb v. Diamond International Corp. highlights the need for dissolved corporations and their insurers to consider the survival statute of their state of incorporation when defending against actions brought in California.

    Filed under:
    USA, California, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, Delaware General Corporation Law, California Supreme Court
    Authors:
    James A. Hazlehurst , Edwin A. Oster , Robert K. Renner
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
    SDNY denies payment of administrative expense claim by relying on the operative document as a whole and rejecting a statutory rule of construction
    2013-02-26

    On December 13, 2012, Judge Vincent L. Briccetti from the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York denied the appellant Notes Trustee’s request to compel payment of an administrative expense claim.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Statutory interpretation, Motion to compel, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 884
    • Page 885
    • Page 886
    • Page 887
    • Current page 888
    • Page 889
    • Page 890
    • Page 891
    • Page 892
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days