Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Bankruptcy update: repos & safe harbor
    2013-03-19

    Few courts have construed the meaning of “repurchase agreement” as used in the Bankruptcy Code, so the recent HomeBanc1 case out of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware is a must-read for “repo” counterparties. The principal issue in HomeBanc was whether several zero purchase price repo transactions under the parties’ contract for the sale and repurchase of mortgage-backed securities fell within the definition of a “repurchase agreement” in Section 101(47) of the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Alston & Bird LLP, Bankruptcy, Security (finance), Mortgage-backed security
    Authors:
    Karen Gelernt , David A. Wender , Jonathan T. Edwards
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    Maryland's highest court holds auctions that charge admission fee are private sales
    2013-03-08

    On March 1, the Court of Appeals of Maryland, answering a question of law certified to it by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, held that the sale of repossessed automobiles at an auction where individuals had to pay a refundable $1,000 cash deposit was a "private sale", and not a "public auction," under the provisions of Maryland's Creditor Grantor Closed End Credit Act (CLEC). Gardner v. Ally Fin. Inc., Misc. No. 10, 2013 WL 765013 (Md. Mar. 1, 2013).

    Filed under:
    USA, Maryland, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
    U.S. Supreme Court declines review of ruling in Fifth Circuit ERISA preemption case
    2013-03-08

    The U.S. Supreme Court recently denied a petition for writ of certiorari by United Healthcare Insurance Company (“UHC”), which had requested judicial review of a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, whose jurisdiction includes the State of Texas. The Fifth Circuit’s opinion had held that ERISA did not preempt state claims brought by Access Mediquip (“Access”), a medical device provider, against UHC for negligent misrepresentation, promissory estoppel, and violations of the Texas Insurance Code (see Access Mediquip L.L.C. v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Co., No.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Haynes and Boone LLP, Federal preemption, Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (USA), Judicial review, Supreme Court of the United States, Fifth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Haynes and Boone LLP
    Bankrupt municipality may reduce retiree benefits
    2013-03-08

    The bankruptcy of the largest U.S. city to file a chapter 9 bankruptcy petition has yielded a decision with serious implications for municipal creditors. Specifically, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California overruled the objections asserted by retired employees of the City of Stockton, California and authorized the City to suspend the retiree’s health benefits during the City’s Chapter 9 case. Ass’n of Retired Employees of the City of Stockton, et al. v. City of Stockton, California (In re City of Stockton), 56 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 250 (Bankr. E.D.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Injunction, Health insurance, Retirement, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
    Nortel reaches settlement with retirees
    2013-03-11

    In In re: Nortel Networks Inc., No. 1:09-bk-10138 (Bankr. D. Del. 2013), Nortel Networks Inc. reached a settlement with over 3,000 of its retired employees for nearly $67 million. Nortel, a former telecom equipment maker, filed for bankruptcy in 2009. In the subsequent four years, Nortel sold off nearly all of its assets, but had been unable to reach a compromise with its retirees to terminate its benefit plans.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Proskauer Rose LLP
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Proskauer Rose LLP
    Fifth Circuit affirms confirmation of cramdown plan with artificial impairment
    2013-03-12

    On February 26, 2013, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Western Real Estate Equities, L.L.C. v. Village at Camp Bowie I, L.P.1 (“Camp Bowie”). The bankruptcy court confirmed a debtor’s plan of reorganization over the objection of the secured creditor that argued the impaired accepting class of the cramdown plan was “artificially” impaired and that the plan was not proposed in good faith.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Debtor, Unsecured debt, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Court upholds plan provision authorizing payment of fees to members of unsecured creditors’ committee
    2013-03-12

    Overview

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Thompson Hine LLP, Unsecured debt, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Alan R. Lepene , Curtis L. Tuggle , Andrew L. Turscak, Jr. , James Henderson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Thompson Hine LLP
    District Court affirms Bankruptcy Court determination that option holder had standing under Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act
    2013-03-13

    In Carroll v. Farooqi, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22329 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 19, 2013), the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas affirmed a U.S. Bankruptcy Court’s holding that an individual had standing to pursue an action against a franchisor under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA). The case involved an unsuccessful sale of a Salad Bowl franchise. The CEO of the fast causal franchise company (who was also its president, chairman, and CFO) contacted a potential buyer of a franchise.

    Filed under:
    USA, Texas, Franchising, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Lathrop GPM, Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Australia), United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Quentin R. Wittrock , Maisa Jean Frank
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lathrop GPM
    Bankruptcy 101 for intellectual property licenses
    2013-03-05

    Generally, license agreements are “executory contracts” in bankruptcy. Executory means performance is due from both sides. When a party to an executory contract becomes a debtor in bankruptcy, it may either reject or assume the contract. However, non-debtor parties (or “counterparties”) enjoy some protections, especially when the contract is a license agreement for intellectual property.

    The basics.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Trademarks, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Default (finance)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
    Superstorm Hurricane Sandy's impact upon business & retailers - bankruptcy and alternatives
    2013-03-05

    In the wake of Hurricane Sandy many businesses have been negatively impacted financially throughout regions from Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware.  Hardest hit are businesses located not only along the New Jersey, Staten Island and  Long Island  NY  coasts but in areas  that  have never experienced such a devastating disaster.  Areas  such as  Hoboken NJ,lower Manhattan and the NYC  East Side.  Even  businesses  located in inland  communit

    Filed under:
    USA, Connecticut, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Duane Morris LLP, Retail
    Authors:
    Walter J. Greenhalgh
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Duane Morris LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 883
    • Page 884
    • Page 885
    • Page 886
    • Current page 887
    • Page 888
    • Page 889
    • Page 890
    • Page 891
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days