Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Insolvency tourism: will the proposed restructuring moratorium entice more to these shores?
    2010-11-18

    On 26 July 2010, the Insolvency Service issued proposals for a new type of short-term restructuring moratorium. The moratorium would be available through a court-based process to companies with a viable business and the general support of creditors. The proposed moratorium could have the potential to encourage more companies to view the UK as an attractive jurisdiction for restructuring.

    What are the proposals?

    The main features are:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Debt, Extraterritoriality, Liquidation, Balance sheet, Moratorium (law), Stakeholder (corporate), Comity, Debtor in possession, Companies Act 2006 (UK), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), UNCITRAL
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    UNCITRAL Practice Guide on Cross-Border Insolvency Cooperation
    2010-02-03

    Summary

    On 1 July 2009, UNCITRAL adopted the Practice Guide on Cross-Border Insolvency Cooperation. The Practice Guide provides a useful reference source on some practical aspects of cooperation and communication to deal with many of the conflicts and tensions between stakeholders and jurisdictions inevitable in cross-border cases. To ease these tensions, it is often essential for creditors and, importantly, the courts concerned to reach agreement about how the process will be handled.

    International context

    Filed under:
    Global, United Kingdom, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Confidentiality, Consideration, UNCITRAL, European Commission, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Sarah Lawson
    Location:
    Global, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Interpreting COMI under the UNCITRAL Model Law
    2009-10-21

    Re Stanford International Bank Limited and others [2009] EWHC 1441 (Ch) provides answers to key questions on the UNCITRAL Model Law on cross-border insolvency. What will courts recognise as a “foreign proceeding”? What types of insolvency practitioners will qualify as “foreign representatives”? Is a company’s “centre of main interests” (COMI) always in the country of its registered office? Linda Ralli considers the practical implications for banks which have lent to foreign companies where they are looking to enforce in England.

    Facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Marketing, Legal burden of proof, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Debt restructuring, UNCITRAL, High Court of Justice
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Court of Appeal refuses to grant indefinite stay on the enforcement of English law debts
    2019-01-24

    Introduction

    For more than a century, a creditor holding English law governed debt relied on the principle (known as the “rule in Gibbs ”) that a debt governed by English law cannot be discharged by a foreign insolvency proceeding, provided that the creditor does not submit to that proceeding.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mayer Brown, UNCITRAL
    Authors:
    Ian McDonald , Alexandra Wood
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    Insolvency and arbitration— the English perspective
    2010-07-20

    Arbitration proceedings in England are creatures of contract, arising out of the agreement between the parties to refer their disputes to arbitration. However, except in limited circumstances, when one of the parties to an arbitration agreement becomes insolvent, England’s statutory insolvency regime takes precedence over the rules of the arbitration.

    The Insolvency Regime in England and Wales

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Mayer Brown, Costs in English law, Debtor, Consideration, Liquidation, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), UNCITRAL
    Authors:
    Jonathan Hosie , Devi Shah
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    Interplay between insolvency and arbitration proceedings— a Hong Kong perspective
    2010-07-20

    The number of international arbitrations involving the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre doubled between 2004 and 2008. The number of winding up petitions is also currently on the rise because of the poor global economic environment. This article discusses conflicts that may arise between the statutory insolvency regime and the contractual rights of parties to arbitrate their disputes in Hong Kong.

    Can Arbitration Be Used To Circumvent Statutory Insolvency Regimes?

    Filed under:
    Hong Kong, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Mayer Brown, Arbitration clause, Debt, Liquidation, Good faith, Liquidator (law), Article 8 ECHR, UNCITRAL, Court of First Instance (Hong Kong)
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    Arbitration and bankruptcy in Brazil
    2010-07-20

    Although in some jurisdictions arbitration is a long-established form of alternative dispute resolution, this mechanism has only recently been regulated in Brazil. The Brazilian Commercial Code, enacted in 1850, already included a few sparse provisions regarding commercial arbitration, but there were no references to specific rules. It was not until 1996 that Brazil passed its first specific arbitration statute, Law No. 9,307/96 (Arbitration Law).

    Filed under:
    Brazil, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Mayer Brown, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Arbitration clause, Arbitration award, Liquidation, Capital punishment, UNCITRAL, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    Brazil
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    Australia: The limits of recognition under the UNCITRAL Model Law - foreign compromises of English law claims
    2018-02-28

    Introduction – why does this matter?

    Filed under:
    Australia, United Kingdom, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Baker McKenzie, Debtor, UNCITRAL, Court of Appeal of England & Wales, High Court of Justice, Court of Appeal (England and Wales)
    Authors:
    David Walter
    Location:
    Australia, United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    INSOL 2017: The good, the bad and the ugly: national and regional law reforms
    2017-03-21

    There has been great discussion over the course of INSOL on the various restructuring and insolvency reforms being considered or implemented globally. In the break out session ‘The good, the bad and the ugly: national and regional law reforms’, panellists drilled down into the detail of some of these reforms. The panel considered reforms in the EU (Prof. Christoph Paulus, Hamboldt-Universitat zu Berlin), the UK (Mark Craggs, Norton Rose Fulbright LLP), Singapore (Sushil Nair, Drew & Napier LLC), and the US (Donald S.

    Filed under:
    European Union, Global, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Baker McKenzie, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), UNCITRAL
    Authors:
    Rian Matthews
    Location:
    European Union, Global, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    INSOL 2017: Enterprise groups in insolvency
    2017-03-19

    Globalization is a hot topic these days. It should come as no surprise, then, that the challenges that come with having a global enterprise in financial distress can be complex. The panelists at the INSOL breakout session, Group next (or not): continuing challenges in the treatment of enterprise groups in insolvency, explored what happens when a global organization with businesses in multiple jurisdictions around the world tries to implement a cohesive and coordinated restructuring.

    Filed under:
    Global, Insolvency & Restructuring, Baker McKenzie, UNCITRAL
    Authors:
    Debra A. Dandeneau
    Location:
    Global
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 19
    • Page 20
    • Page 21
    • Page 22
    • Page 23
    • Current page 24
    • Page 25
    • Page 26
    • Page 27
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days