Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Second Circuit holds that senior creditors’ “gifting” of value to existing shareholder under reorganization plan violates absolute priority rule
    2011-02-10

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, on Feb. 7, 2011, held that senior creditors could not “gift” part of their reorganization plan recovery to existing shareholders of the debtor.In re DBSD N. Am., Inc., __ F.3d __, 2011 WL 350480 (2d Cir. Feb. 7, 2011) (2-1) (Lynch, J.) (explainingIn re DBSD N. Am., Inc., 627 F.3d 496 (2d Cir. 2010) (summary opinion)). Its extensive 62-page opinion explained the court’s previous two-page summary ruling of Dec.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Interest, Debt, Standing (law), Unsecured creditor, Sprint Corporation, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook , Joseph E. Bain
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Second Circuit rejects gifting exception to absolute priority rule and affirms vote designation for claims acquired in bad faith
    2011-02-17

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the “Second Circuit”) on February 7, 2011 issued an opinion rejecting the often used gifting doctrine in the context of a plan of reorganization on the one hand, while affirming vote designation for claims not purchased in good faith on the other.In re DBSD N. Am., Inc., __ F.3d __, 2011 WL 350480 (2d Cir. Feb. 7, 2011).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dechert LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Unsecured debt, Interest, Federal Reporter, Debt, Good faith, Voting, Bad faith, Secured creditor, Warrant (finance), Sprint Corporation, Dish Network, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, First Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dechert LLP
    Beware of creditors bearing gifts: the Second Circuit’s recent decision in In re: DBSD North America, Inc. casts significant doubt on “gift” plans
    2011-02-28

    On February 7, 2011 the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its eagerly awaited opinion in the consolidated appealIn re: DBSD North America, Inc., Docket Nos. 10-1175, 10-1201, 10-1352, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 27007.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Latham & Watkins LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Dividends, Federal Reporter, Liquidation, Secured creditor, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, First Circuit
    Authors:
    Mark A. Broude , Jason B. Sanjana
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Latham & Watkins LLP
    Gifting
    2011-03-22

    For over 30 years, most bankruptcy courts have approved plans where the secured lender “gifts” a distribution to a junior class in order to obtain a consensual plan. These courts note that the distribution is from the secured lender’s property (not estate property) and the secured lender can do what it wants with its own property.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Share (finance), Debtor, Unsecured debt, Federal Reporter, Debt, Consent, Liquidation, Dissenting opinion, Unsecured creditor, Warrant (finance), Westlaw, Dish Network, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Peter S. Clark, II
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Service issues letter ruling on application of Section 382(l)(5) for a consolidated group which filed for bankruptcy protection under Title 11
    2011-04-10

    In PLR 201051019 (12/23/2010), the Service ruled that in computing a consolidated group’s §382 limitation after filing for bankruptcy relief, all of its outstanding liabilities before the ownership change should be taken into account at the adjusted issue price, regardless of whether the obligations were subsequently discharged in whole or in part during the recognition period.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Fox Rothschild LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Taxable income, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Holding company, Subsidiary, Preferred stock, Pro rata, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Jerald David August
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Bank's lack of diligence results in denial of late claim
    2011-05-25

    COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION v. LAKE SHORE ASSET MANAGEMENT LTD. (May 11, 2011)

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Share (finance), Shareholder, Fraud, Asset management, Default judgment, Commodity market, Pro rata, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
    In re Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation Shareholder Litigation
    2011-06-10

    Delaware Court Addresses Important Revlon Duties in Cash/Stock Mergers

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, King & Spalding LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Fiduciary, Preliminary injunction, Consideration, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Standard of review, Intermediate scrutiny, Subsidiary, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court
    Authors:
    E William Bates II (Bill) , M Robert Thornton (Bob)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    King & Spalding LLP
    This week in securities litigation (November 4, 2011)
    2011-11-04

    The rapid collapse of MF Global into bankruptcy amid claims that millions of dollars in customer funds is a key focus for the SEC and CFTC as well as SIPIC this week. Speculation over the outcome of the hearings before Judge Rakoff on the SEC’s settlement with Citigroup is also a key topic in securities litigation this week.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Injunction, Security (finance), Fraud, Subprime lending, Mortgage-backed security, Securities fraud, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA), Janus Capital Group, Securities Act 1933 (USA)
    Authors:
    Thomas O. Gorman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dorsey & Whitney LLP
    Second Circuit adopts net investment method to determine net equity in Madoff bankruptcy case
    2011-09-13

    On August 16, 2011, the Second Circuit held that Irving H. Picard, the Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC ("Trustee"), utilized the correct methodology to determine the "net equity" of each Madoff investor under the Securities Investor Protection Act ("SIPA").

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Debtor, Security (finance), Fraud, Limited liability company, Option (finance), Liquidation, Broker-dealer, Investment funds, Market value, Title 11 of the US Code, Trustee, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Showell v. Pusey, C.A. No. 3970-VGC (Del. Ch. Sept. 1, 2011) (Glasscock, V.C.)
    2011-09-07

    In this memorandum opinion, the Court of Chancery held that a retiring member of a limited liability company was entitled to his proportionate share of the liquidation value, rather than the going concern value, of the company.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Share (finance), Interest, Limited liability company, Accounting, Consent, Retirement, Proportionality (law), Memorandum opinion, Court of Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 15
    • Page 16
    • Page 17
    • Page 18
    • Current page 19
    • Page 20
    • Page 21
    • Page 22
    • Page 23
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days