The Government of India has introduced a slew of legislative, regulatory and financial measures to support the MSME sector amidst the financial crisis created by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Background
The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSME Act) provides a raft of protections and incentives for micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs).
As previewed in our prior post, Poland’s simplified restructuring proceeding (uproszczone postępowanie restrukturyzacyjne) is now in effect. The enabling legislation – with only minor changes from the description in our prior post affecting such restructurings – was finally adopted on 19 June 2020, signed into law on 23 June 2020 and took effect the same day.
The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill (the Bill) is being accelerated through Parliament and will soon become the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (the Act).
The Act, intended to give extra support to companies in financial difficulty, is likely to come into effect during July 2020. An overview of the Act can be found in our previous article.
For many companies facing financial stress, restructuring liabilities is the only way for their business to survive. Consensual restructuring, or voluntary workout, requires agreement from creditors to reorganise the company’s liabilities, and is typically implemented by agreement between the company and its creditors. Court-based restructuring processes, on the other hand, involve at least some degree of legal coercion of creditors to vary or release liabilities.
Re Akkurate Ltd (in Liquidation) [2020] EWHC 1433 (Ch)
Back in November we reported on the case of Wallace v Wallace [2019] EWHC 2503 (Ch), where the Court grappled with the diverging authorities on the issue of whether section 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986 has extra-territorial effect.
The issue recently came back before the Court in Re Akkurate Ltd (in Liquidation) [2020] EWHC 1433 (Ch).
What did the Court decide?
The High Court has held that s.236 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (“IA 1986”) does not have extra-territorial effect, so that the court is not generally permitted to make an order requiring a person outside the UK to produce books and papers and give an account of their dealings with an insolvent company: Re Akkurate Ltd (in Liquidation) [2020] EWHC 1433 (Ch).
Welcome to the inaugural edition of our new newsletter, which is intended to capture the key developments in the English disputes arena over the past three months. We hope that you will find it an interesting read, whether you are a litigator, either in private practice or in-house, or a generalist wanting to keep abreast of the goings on in this space. We also hope that you will pass it on to any of your colleagues who may find it useful.
The Government is in the process of pushing the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill through Parliament, with it anticipated to become law later in June. The Bill represents the biggest overhaul of the UK’s insolvency legislation for over 30 years.
In this week’s update: the test for an LLP member to bring a derivative claim, updated guidance on company meetings, the court sanctions a takeover despite not all beneficial owners being able to vote on the scheme and a few other items.
Covid-19 is affecting the way people conduct their business, retain their staff, engage with clients, comply with regulations and the list goes on. Read our thoughts on these issues and many others on our dedicated Covid-19 page.
The Government is in the process of pushing the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill through Parliament, with it anticipated to become law later in June. The Bill represents the biggest overhaul of the UK’s insolvency legislation for over 30 years.