Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Bankruptcy court holds that section 546(e) safe harbor does not apply to “settlement payments” made in a small, private leveraged buyout that poses no systemic risk to the securities market
    2011-05-11

    In Geltzer v. Mooney (In re MacMenamin’s Grill, Ltd.), Adv. Pro. No. 09-8266 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. April 21, 2011), the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York held that the safe harbor in section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code does not apply to a small, private leveraged buyout (LBO) transaction that posed no systemic risk to the stability of the financial markets.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Alston & Bird LLP, Shareholder, Debtor, Fraud, Safe harbor (law), Interest, Leveraged buyout, Systemic risk, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Authors:
    Jason H. Watson , David A. Wender , Jonathan T. Edwards
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    REMIC investor lacks standing to object to sale of collateral in borrower's bankruptcy reorganization
    2011-05-13

    In a recent decision, the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York concluded that an investor in a Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit ("REMIC") lacked standing to object to the sale of a chapter 11 debtor's real property, despite that the property served as collateral for loans held in trust by the REMIC for the benefit of its investors.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Security (finance), Interest, Taxable income, Mortgage loan, Standing (law), Investment funds, Default (finance), United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    A sale “free and clear” is not necessarily free and clear of all future tort liability
    2011-05-23

    Under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, a trustee or debtor-in-possession may sell property free and clear of “any interest in such property of an entity other than the estate.” Thus, a buyer can generally acquire assets from a bankruptcy estate without subjecting itself to liability or claims based on the seller’s prior actions. InMorgan Olson, LLC v. Frederico (In re Grumman Olson Indus., Inc.), No. 02-16131, 2011 WL 766661 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Chadbourne & Parke LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Injunction, Limited liability company, Liquidation, In rem jurisdiction, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Authors:
    Michael Distefano
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Chadbourne & Parke LLP
    Bankruptcy court’s solution to revive a plan based on failed substantive consolidation
    2011-05-23

    In general, substantive consolidation allows for the assets and liabilities of affiliated debtor entities to be consolidated and disbursed as if the assets were held and the liabilities were owed by a single legal entity. Unlike joint administration, which promotes procedural convenience and efficiency without affecting the substantive rights of creditors, substantive consolidation can force creditors of a solvent debtor to share in the debtors’ aggregate asset pool in parity with creditors of less solvent debtors.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Chadbourne & Parke LLP, Bankruptcy, Legal personality, Retail, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Brand, Accounting, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Good faith, Consolidation (business), Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Chadbourne & Parke LLP
    Motion to transfer reinsurance matter to district hearing related cases involving different reinsurers denied
    2011-05-18

    Plaintiff White Mountains Re, successor in interest to MONY Re, filed an action in the New York Supreme Court against Travelers asserting claims for declaratory judgment and breach of contract arising out of a dispute concerning certain reinsurance contracts. Travelers removed the action to the US District Court for the Southern District of New York and subsequently filed a motion to transfer this action to the District of Connecticut.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jorden Burt LLP, Surety, Breach of contract, Interest, Reinsurance, Supreme Court of the United States, New York Supreme Court, US District Court for District of Connecticut
    Authors:
    John Black
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jorden Burt LLP
    Bankruptcy court holds: affirmative actions taken by mortgage lender exclude rents from bankruptcy estate
    2011-05-16

    In a decision that clarifies the rights of secured lenders to rents generated by a mortgaged property under New York law, a bankruptcy court in the Southern District of New York has held that rents which were assigned pre-petition pursuant to an assignment of rents executed in connection with a mortgage loan do not belong to the bankruptcy estate because the Lender took sufficient affirmative actions to perfect its rights over the rents.1

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarter & English LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Leasehold estate, Interest, Debt, Mortgage loan, Foreclosure, Cashflow, Default (finance), Capital punishment, Affirmative action, Secured loan, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    McCarter & English LLP
    Reinstatement of debt: a bankruptcy court's strict interpretation and application of change-in-control provisions to protect senior secured lenders
    2011-05-13

    In In re Young Broadcasting, Inc., et al., 430 B.R. 99 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010), a bankruptcy court strictly construed the change-in-control provisions of a pre-petition credit agreement and refused to confirm an unsecured creditors' committee's plan of reorganization, which had been premised on the reinstatement of the debtors' accelerated secured debt under Section 1124(2) of the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Unsecured debt, Debt, Maturity (finance), Default (finance), Preferred stock, Secured loan, Pro rata, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
    Decision in point blank solutions helps define "Core" and "Non-core"
    2011-05-24

    Summary

    In an opinion published May 20, 2011, Judge Walsh held that a settlement agreement which is rejected in a bankruptcy proceeding is “Core” and will be decided by the Bankruptcy Court, even when it contains a jurisdictional clause that requires the agreement to be interpreted according to the laws of New York. Judge Walsh’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Federal Reporter, Liability (financial accounting), Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    L. John Bird
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    New York bankruptcy court holds that Bankruptcy Code’s two-year extension of time to bring actions applies to foreign representatives in Chapter 15 cases
    2011-05-31

    Section 108 of the Bankruptcy Code grants a two-year extension of time for a trustee in bankruptcy (or a debtor in possession) to bring law suits, provided that the applicable period to sue didn’t expire before the petition date. It also gives a short extension to the trustee for filing pleadings, curing defaults, and performing other acts on behalf of the debtor. These provisions afford a trustee and debtor in possession valuable time to discover and evaluate potential causes of action and to perform other acts to preserve the debtor’s rights.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Security (finance), Statute of limitations, Investment management, Liquidation, Default (finance), Debtor in possession, Liquidator (law), US Congress, Title 11 of the US Code, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Alan W Kornberg , Stephen J. Shimshak , Claudia R Tobler
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
    Governor Cuomo appoints Assemblyman Jonathan Bing to head New York Liquidation Bureau
    2011-06-08

    On June 8, 2011, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo announced the appointment of Assemblyman Jonathan Bing to serve as Special Deputy Superintendent of the New York Liquidation Bureau, an agency tasked with protecting policyholders and creditors of insurance companies that have gone bankrupt.  Bing steps in as the successor to Dennis J. Hayes, who was appointed to the position in September 2009.  Bing’s appointment ends his fifth term in the New York State Assembly, where he has represented the 73rd District since November 2002.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Locke Lord LLP, Bankruptcy, Liquidation, Brokerage firm, California State Assembly
    Authors:
    Amber S. Mills
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Locke Lord LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 26
    • Page 27
    • Page 28
    • Page 29
    • Current page 30
    • Page 31
    • Page 32
    • Page 33
    • Page 34
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days