In This Issue:

The Year in Bankruptcy: 2020

A brief chronicle of the year's notable developments in corporate bankruptcy and restructuring. [read more …]

Focus on Health Care Provider Bankruptcies

GOVERNANCE & SECURITIES LAW FOCUS

Proxima Nova A ExCn 35pt

MAY 2020/LATIN AMERICA

Below is a summary of the main developments in US, EU, and UK corporate governance and securities law since our last update in February 2020.

Financial regulatory developments are available here.

IN THIS ISSUE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COVID-19: Summary of Key Issues.................................................................................... 1

The economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic will leave in its wake a significant increase in commercial chapter 11 filings. Many of these cases will feature extensive litigation involving breach of contract claims, business interruption insurance disputes, and common law causes of action based on novel interpretations of long-standing legal doctrines such as force majeure.

In 2019, the increased wave of distressed health care companies continued, and with downward pressure on reimbursement rates, regulatory changes, decreased occupancy rates and technological advances, this trend is unlikely to subside in 2020.

Health care providers often are heavily dependent on revenues from government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, accounting for nearly 40% of national health care spending in 2018. Therefore, a Medicare payment suspension could cripple a health care provider.

Two recent decisions involving health care companies demonstrate how reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code¹ can be used to manage large liabilities.

Yes, says the Third Circuit. The Third Circuit recently held that the Bankruptcy Court has the authority to confirm a chapter 11 plan which contains nonconsensual, third-party releases when such releases are integral to the successful reorganization. The court’s decision in In re Millennium holds that, when the third-party releases are integral to the restructuring of the debtor-creditor relationship, the Bankruptcy Court has the constitutional authority to approve nonconsensual, third-party releases.

Background

On December 19, 2019, the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held in In re Millennium Lab Holdings II, LLC¹that bankruptcy courts have the constitutional authority, well within the constraints of Stern v.

The Bottom Line

Breaking from the overwhelming majority of prior case law, two bankruptcy courts recently held that Medicare and Medicaid provider agreements can be assigned as part of a Section 363 bankruptcy sale free and clear of the assignor’s liabilities under the provider agreements.