Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    European Court of Justice resolves - Peeters/Gatzen claim falls within the scope of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012 (Brussels I recast) instead of Regulation (EU) 2015/848 (Insolvency Regulation)
    2019-03-11

    1. Introduction

    Filed under:
    European Union, Netherlands, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stibbe, Money laundering, Court of Justice of the European Union
    Authors:
    Marleen Jonckers
    Location:
    European Union, Netherlands
    Firm:
    Stibbe
    Judical Reorganisation through a Business Transfer under Pressure
    2019-03-14

    The Belgian legislature once again recently improved the statutory framework for business restructuring. Thus, any business - a broad concept that covers not only companies and non-profits but also independent contractors - in financial difficulty may request the opening of judicial reorganisation proceedings (procédure en réorganisation judiciaire), commonly referred to by insiders as "PRJ".

    Filed under:
    European Union, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, NautaDutilh, CJEU
    Authors:
    Sophie Jacmain , Gisèle Uwera
    Location:
    European Union
    Firm:
    NautaDutilh
    High Court clarifies its approach to determination of "Loss" under the 1992 ISDA Master Agreement
    2019-03-18

    Under the 1992 ISDA Master Agreement, following an event of default, there is either an automatic termination or the non-defaulting party can serve a notice designating an Early Termination Date. There then has to be a determination by the non-defaulting party of the compensation that is owed by one party or the other. This is done by closing out the transactions, which involves determining gains or losses in replacing or providing the economic equivalent of the terminated transactions. Once that is done, a statement is served setting out the calculations.

    Filed under:
    European Union, United Kingdom, Banking, Capital Markets, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stephenson Harwood LLP, Lehman Brothers
    Authors:
    Edward Davis , Jeremy Livingston
    Location:
    European Union, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Stephenson Harwood LLP
    El TJUE permite salvar los procedimientos de ejecución en supuestos de vencimiento anticipado de hipotecas de consumidores
    2019-03-26

    Una sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (TJUE) avala sustituir una cláusula abusiva de vencimiento anticipado en un préstamo hipotecario por la aplicación del artículo 693.2 de la Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil (LEC), según el cual es válido y no abusivo iniciar una ejecución hipotecaria por impago de al menos tres cuotas mensuales.

    Filed under:
    European Union, Spain, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Garrigues, CJEU
    Authors:
    Diego Vicente Pérez , Juan Verdugo
    Location:
    European Union, Spain
    Firm:
    Garrigues
    European Court of Justice: actio pauliana is covered by jurisdiction rule of forum of contract. A judgment with foreseeable consequences?
    2019-04-02

    Imagine that a debtor voluntarily concludes a transaction with a third party where he knows (or should know) that it hinders the creditor’s possibilities of collecting the debt. In civil law countries, a creditor can invoke the nullification of that legal act by means of a so-called actio pauliana. This raises the question of which court has jurisdiction in the case of an international dispute, regarding an actio pauliana, that is instituted by a creditor against a third party?

    Filed under:
    European Union, Poland, Banking, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stibbe, Debtor, Court of Justice of the European Union
    Authors:
    Cas Michiels
    Location:
    European Union, Poland
    Firm:
    Stibbe
    No Deal, No PPF?
    2019-04-02

    Brexit insolvency issues for trustees of pension schemes with overseas sponsors

    You might remember that before 2016, in the world before the EU referendum (which did exist!), it was effectively not possible for the insolvency of an overseas sponsor of a UK pension scheme to trigger entry into the PPF unless the overseas sponsor had a branch or office (an “establishment”) in the UK (for legal geeks you might remember this was the issue discussed in the Olympic Airlines case which was heard by the Supreme Court in 2015).

    Filed under:
    European Union, United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Public, Squire Patton Boggs, Brexit
    Authors:
    Simon James
    Location:
    European Union, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Application of the Council Regulation on Insolvency Proceedings
    2019-02-27

    Cases involving the application of the Council Regulation (EC) No. 1346 / 2000 (the ‘Regulation’) have been rare before the Maltese Courts since Malta joined the European Union in May 2004. Thus far, the only instance where an issue involving the interpretation of the Regulation arose involved a maritime case – The Foreign Economic Technical Co. Operative Company of China et vs m.v.

    Filed under:
    European Union, Malta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ganado Advocates, Debtor, Liquidator (law), European Commission
    Authors:
    Louis Cassar Pullicino
    Location:
    European Union, Malta
    Firm:
    Ganado Advocates
    English Court of Appeal Upholds "The Gibbs Rule"
    2019-02-27

    In Short:

    The Situation: In Bakhshiyeva v Sberbank of Russia, a debtor sought to restructure English law-governed debts pursuant to an Azerbaijani restructuring proceeding. In order to prevent certain dissenting creditors from commencing enforcement proceedings against the debtor in the UK, the debtor asked the English court to provide an indefinite stay.

    Filed under:
    European Union, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Public, Jones Day
    Authors:
    Sarah Archer
    Location:
    European Union, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Restructuring & Insolvency Newsletter - March 2019 | Judgments of interest
    2019-03-04

    Ranking of claims payable to the government in respect of refunded subsidies depends on when they were granted

    Judgment by the Supreme Court (Chamber One), November 20, 2018

    Chronological parameters must be used when classifying claims arising from the obligation to refund subsidies. Accordingly, if the subsidies were granted before the insolvency order, the claim in respect of the refunded subsidy must be a pre-insolvency claim whereas if the subsidy was granted after the insolvency order, the claim for the refund must be a post-insolvency claim.

    Filed under:
    European Union, Spain, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Garrigues, CJEU
    Authors:
    Adrian Thery , Borja García-Alamán , Juan Verdugo
    Location:
    European Union, Spain
    Firm:
    Garrigues
    Cross-border insolvency: making a case of harmonised insolvency laws across the EU
    2019-03-04

    Cross-border insolvency law has been gaining importance in the EU’s legal system over the past few decades. Harmonising insolvency laws is a difficult process as the legal framework interacts with a myriad of domestic laws. In order to increase the effectiveness of cross-border insolvency proceedings, the original Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings was replaced by new Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 the Insolvency Proceedings (Recast) Regulation (the “Recast”).

    Filed under:
    European Union, Malta, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Gauci-Maistre Xynou (Legal | Assurance), European Commission
    Location:
    European Union, Malta
    Firm:
    Gauci-Maistre Xynou (Legal | Assurance)

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 832
    • Page 833
    • Page 834
    • Page 835
    • Current page 836
    • Page 837
    • Page 838
    • Page 839
    • Page 840
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days