Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Federal Court finds that a retention of title clause is to be considered a “security”, defeating the liquidators’ unfair preference claim
    2016-05-27

    This week’s TGIF considers the decision in Hussain v CSR Building Products Limited, in the matter of FPJ Group Pty Ltd (In Liq), in which an ROT clause was held to be a “security”, defeating the liquidators’ unfair preference claim.

    Background

    On 18 July 2014, FPJ Group Pty Ltd (FPJ Group) was wound up in insolvency.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Unsecured debt, Debt, Liquidator (law), Title retention clause
    Authors:
    David Abernethy , Kirsty Sutherland , Mark Wilks , Matthew Critchley
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    The enforcement of debt owed by a taxpayer
    2016-05-27

    Introduction

    Governments raise taxes to ensure the country can fund essential public services. Taxes are used to build and maintain public infrastructure such as roads and transport services and to provide education, a world class health care system as well as welfare assistance.

    Paying taxes is part of our civic duty. Sometimes, however, taxpayers (whether individuals or companies) do not or cannot meet their obligations and it is necessary for steps to be taken by and on behalf of the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) to recover those taxes.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Tax, William Roberts Lawyers, Debtor, Dividends, Debt, Life insurance, Australian Taxation Office
    Authors:
    Robert Ishak , Bruce Cussen
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    William Roberts Lawyers
    International review - May 2016
    2016-05-31

    FI and D&O Since our last update, there have been significant developments in the FI and D&O landscape. November saw the first ever UK deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) announced between the SFO and Standard Bank. The DPA process has been available but unused since 2014 so the judgment and the SFO’s comments thereafter provided some much needed guidance on what the process involved. Significantly, weight was placed on Standard Bank’s early self-reporting and cooperation.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Canada, OECD, United Kingdom, USA, Delaware, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, IT & Data Protection, Litigation, Planning, White Collar Crime, Clyde & Co LLP, Deferred prosecution, Financial Conduct Authority (UK)
    Location:
    Australia, Canada, OECD, United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Clyde & Co LLP
    Consequences of bringing a deed of company arrangement to a premature end
    2016-06-03

    This week’s TGIF considers the decision of Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v BE100 Property Investments Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 597 where the court found that a deed administrator acted unreasonably by attempting to terminate a deed of company arrangement immediately before a meeting of creditors.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Deed
    Authors:
    David Abernethy , Kirsty Sutherland , Mark Wilks , Matthew Critchley
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Corporate Advisory Update - May 2016
    2016-06-03

    Legislation and proposed legislation

    Government consults on proposals for technology neutrality in the distribution of company meeting communications

    The Government has proposed a technology neutral mode of distributing company meeting notices and materials which aims to facilitate innovation and reduce economic and time costs for companies, while maintaining an appropriate level of shareholder engagement.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Capital Markets, Company & Commercial, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Gilbert + Tobin, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Public consultations, Data transfers, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Hiroshi Narushima , Jessica van Rooy , Sally Randall
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Gilbert + Tobin
    Retention of title and the PPSA: a high steaks issue
    2016-05-26

    Key Points:

    This case provides some clarification of matters relating to registration of retention of title clauses for secured creditors dealing with grantors

    The registration of security interests on the Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR) is a critical, yet unresolved, issue in the context of the appointment of administrators and liquidators, and also for parties to sale transactions.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clayton Utz, Title retention clause, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Rebecca Magee
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Clayton Utz
    Bond’s Bell group litigation never dies: High Court strikes down WA laws as constitutionally invalid
    2016-05-26

    Bell Group N. V (in liquidation) v Western Australia [2016] HCA 21

    Alan Bond passed away last year, but the legal battles over the 1990 collapse of his Bell Group companies may yet continue. The High Court has declared state legislation, which was designed to end the long-running litigation by short-circuiting certain aspects of the Corporations Act 2001 (C’th), constitutionally invalid.

    Background

    Filed under:
    Australia, Western Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, The Commercial Bar Association of Victoria, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), US Constitution, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), High Court of Australia
    Authors:
    Evelyn R Tadros
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    The Commercial Bar Association of Victoria
    Liquidators and trusts: further developments regarding fees and priorities
    2016-05-11

    On 23 February 2016, Justice Brereton of the Supreme Court of New South Wales handed down a decision In the matter ofIndependent Contractor Services (Aust) Pty Limited ACN 119 186 971(in liquidation) (No 2) that may significantly impact the economics of winding up of corporate trustees and the return to priority creditors such as employees.

    In summary, the Court held that:

    Filed under:
    Australia, New South Wales, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hall & Wilcox, Australian Taxation Office, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    David Dickens
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Hall & Wilcox
    Corporate and Business Rescue in Australia: Insolvency Law Reform Process Continues as Government Releases Proposals Paper
    2016-05-12

    Background

    On 7 December 2015, the Australian Government released its "National Innovation and Science Agenda" ("Agenda"). In the Agenda, the Government outlined its intention to make three significant reforms to Australia's insolvency laws, adopting the recommendations of the Productivity Commission ("Commission") in its report, "Business Set-Up, Transfer and Closure" ("Report"), released on the same day as the Agenda:

    Filed under:
    Australia, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day
    Authors:
    Katie Higgins , Roger Dobson , Dr Kai Luck
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    No green light for establishing causation in shareholder claims
    2016-05-12

    Key Points:

    While shareholders may only need to establish indirect market causation, there are still significant obstacles for establishing shareholder claims.

    Do plaintiffs in a shareholder class action have to show they relied upon misleading or deceptive conduct, or is it enough that the market in general relied upon them, which then affected the share price?

    Filed under:
    Australia, New South Wales, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clayton Utz, Shareholder, Class action, Causation (law)
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Clayton Utz

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 799
    • Page 800
    • Page 801
    • Page 802
    • Current page 803
    • Page 804
    • Page 805
    • Page 806
    • Page 807
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days