Today (16 June 2021) the UK governmentannounced a further extension of some (but not all) of the temporary measures first introduced by the Corporate Governance and Insolvency Act 2020 (CIGA) in June last year.
The two most significant temporary measures for companies facing financial difficulties as a result of the COVID 19 pandemic were:
INTRODUCTION
今回のニュースレターでは、2021 年 5 月の破産倒産法関連の主なアップデートについて取り扱ってい ます。インド最高裁判所（＝SC）、会社法上訴審判所（＝NCLAT）、会社法審判所（NCLT）の各裁判 所において下された重要な判決について、まとめました。
1) NO INTERFERENCE IN THE DECISION OF THE LIQUIDATOR TAKEN IN THE BEST INTEREST OF A CORPORATE DEBTOR.
Matter: Basavaraj Koujalagi & Ors. v. Sumit Binani, Liquidator of Gujarat NRE Coke Limited
Order dated: 03 May 2021.
Summary:
On 9 June 2021, the Dubai Court of Cassation adopting a restrictive interpretation of the UAE Federal Law No 11 of 1992 and its amendments (the Civil Procedure Code) has added a requirement for the success of a debt recovery claim through a payment order application to the summary judge: there must be written evidence that the debt was either accepted or acknowledged by the debtor. This article provides an overview of the legal requirements of the payment order claim and what this new requirement of the Dubai Court of Cassation means for creditors in Dubai.
Imprisonment for civil or commercial debts is prohibited in Mexico. The creditor’s only chance for recovery is upon the debtor’s assets.
Brief background factsIn the case of Ler Cheng Chye & Anor v Wong Ching Yong & Ors [2020] 7 AMR 900, [2020] MLJU 1565, Darryl Goon J decided on the issues concerning a challenge to the role played by a receiver and manager, and the need to consider what a receiver and manager appointed over the assets and undertaking of a company may or may not do, upon the commencement of winding up proceedings of that company.
The scope of enforcement immunity for the sole home of a debtor has been determined in a recent Ruling* of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.
The Constitutional Court has considerably limited the immunity from enforcement on the sole residence of a bankrupt individual. Such immunity will not apply if a debtor is found to have abused his rights (e.g. by withdrawing assets from bankruptcy proceedings to secure their immunity by purchasing a “luxury” home).
Конституционный Суд РФ в своем недавнем Постановлении определил границы исполнительского иммунитета единственного жилья должника.
In Decision 5A_910/2019, the Swiss Supreme Court considered that an award rendered in a foreign arbitration may be recognised and enforced in Switzerland, even if the award was rendered after a party went bankrupt. The subject matter of the arbitration does not become non-arbitrable following a party's bankruptcy, if the arbitration was initiated before bankruptcy.
In a recently published decision, the Swiss Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against a lower court judgment recognising and enforcing an LCIA award.
Badenoch Integrated Logging Pty Ltd v Bryant, in the matter of Gunns Limited (in liq) (receivers and managers appointed) [2021] FCAFC 64
CVA challenges have been in the spotlight recently and the story continues with Nero Holdings Ltd v Young in which the court considered an application to strike out a CVA challenge claim. Although there is nothing ground-breaking in the court’s reasoning to dismiss the strike out/summary judgment application, its detailed reasoning will offer some helpful guidance and assistance to those involved in these applications.