A bankruptcy court gave “unnecessary and unlikely incorrect” reasoning to support its “excessively broad proposition that sales free and clear under [Bankruptcy Code (“Code”)] Section 363 override, and essentially render nugatory, the critical lessee protections against a debtor-lessor under [Code] 365(h),” said the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Feb. 16, 2022. In re Royal Bistro, LLC, 2022 WL 499938, *1-*2 (5th Cir. Feb. 16, 2022).
What's this Update about?
In the recent decision of the Malaysian High Court in Re Top Builders Capital Bhd & Ors [2022] MLJU 1 ("Top Builders"), Ong Chee Kwan JC reaffirmed certain principles for the sanction of a scheme of arrangement ("SOA") and also decided on some novel issues:-
R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates’ Court [2021] EWHC 3013
The case of Palmer has confirmed that an insolvency practitioner in the role of an administrator can be prosecuted (and therefore personally liable) for a failure to follow correct redundancy procedures prescribed by s194 TULRCA.
Where an individual is found to have acted in breach of s194, they may be personally liable to an unlimited fine (or a fine of up to £5,000 if the offence is committed before 12 March 2015).
The facts
Chris Corbin and Jeremy King, part owners of the company that owns the famous Wolseley restaurant had their company pushed into administration by its co-owner and major lender, having been in default since 2020, and now owes £38m. Administration might not have come as a surprise to anyone in that case.
However, directors and shareholders will not usually get anything like as much notice of a lender’s intention to appoint administrators and will frequently get none at all, as Insolvency and Asset Recovery Partner Tim Symes explains here.
Over the past decade, there have been several court decisions on whether particular make-whole premiums should be allowed as part of a creditor's claim in bankruptcy, such as Momentive,1 EFH,2 American Airlines,3 and Ultra Petroleum.4 Although these decisions and others set forth the legal standards to be applied and resolved the specific claims at issue, the decisions provide little guidance or clarity on the allowability of make-whole claims in future cases.
Im Browser ansehen Im Browser ansehen
Februar 2022
Februar 2022
NFFeebbrruueaarrw22002222sletteNr eRwuslselattnedr Russland tteINNrneesRowwulvsssellsneezlattattnneefIderrncshRRotuuulvnssegssn:zllRaaaennncfddehctshpturencgh:uRnegcshtbsperseicchhutngsbe
0a2n1fI2I22ennc000ssh111oot999ullvvneegnn222:zz000Raa222enn111cff2eehcc0tshh1ptt9uurenncgg2h::0uRR2nee1gccshhttbsspperrrseeiccchhhuutnnggssbbeerrssiicchhtt
Englische Version Russische Version
Englische Version
Russische Version Englische Version REunsgsliisscchhee VVeerrssiioonn Russische Version
Lots of things are wrong with the student loan program in these United States. For example:
- It’s a corporate-welfare program for high-price colleges; but
- Their students pay the price.
Unfortunately, the safety valve protection for students (i.e., a bankruptcy discharge) has failed them—and made the problem worse!
Here’s how
Introduction
Earlier this month, the English Insolvency and Companies Court (the “ICC”) made a limited civil restraint order against a shareholder who had repeatedly sought, unmeritoriously, to challenge the 2017 restructuring of Paragon Offshore plc (in liquidation) (“Paragon”) (Hammersley v Soden & Ors [2022] EWHC 223 (Ch)).
View in browser View in browser
February 2022
February 2022
30 декабря 2021 Федеральная налоговая служба опубликовала обзор судебной практики арбитражных судов по оспариванию сделок в процедуре банкротства[1].
В обзоре содержатся актуальная судебная практика арбитражных судов федеральных округов и Верховного Суда РФ, позиции из которой необходимо учитывать при оспаривании сделок в рамках банкротных процедур.