Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act order excludes enforcement of certain Australian insolvency judgments in New Zealand
    2013-09-30

    On 11 October 2013, the Trans-Tasman Proceedings regime will come into effect. The Trans-Tasman Proceedings Act 2010 aims to streamline the process for resolving Trans-Tasman civil proceedings, with the intention of reducing costs and improving efficiency in enforcing Australian judgments in New Zealand.

    Filed under:
    Australia, New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Buddle Findlay
    Authors:
    David Perry , Scott Barker , Willie Palmer
    Location:
    Australia, New Zealand
    Firm:
    Buddle Findlay
    UK court finds withdrawal of letters of support by parent company is not a voidable transaction
    2013-06-27

    In Carillion Construction Ltd v Hussain, the English High Court held that the withdrawal of letters of support given by a parent company to the directors of its subsidiary was not a transaction defrauding creditors under the Insolvency Act 1986 (UK).

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Buddle Findlay, Carillion
    Authors:
    David Perry , Scott Barker , Willie Palmer
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Buddle Findlay
    Relief from forfeiture not limited to rights over real property
    2013-04-03

    In Cukurova Finance International Ltd v Alfa Telecom Turkey Ltd [2013] UKPC 2, the Privy Council held that a borrower may claim relief from forfeiture notwithstanding that the forfeited security has been appropriated by the lender in satisfaction of a debt.

    Filed under:
    Turkey, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Telecoms, Buddle Findlay
    Authors:
    David Perry , Scott Barker , Willie Palmer
    Location:
    Turkey, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Buddle Findlay
    Court of Appeal rejects High Court's categorisation of insolvent transactions
    2012-12-20

    In our March 2012 update we reported on a claim under section 294 of the Companies Act 1993 by the liquidators of Five Star Finance Limited (in liquidation) (FSF) against a trustee of a trading trust (Bowden No. 14 Trust (Trust)) to set aside payments amounting to $928,937.79.

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Buddle Findlay
    Authors:
    David Perry , Scott Barker , Willie Palmer
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Buddle Findlay
    Skeletons in Halliwells LLP's closet: secret meetings, fraud and siphoned funds
    2012-06-29

    As noted in our July 2010 newsletter, lawyers are not immune from the recession.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Buddle Findlay
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Buddle Findlay
    Dispositions to trust not set aside
    2011-12-19

    In the recent decision in Taylor v Official Assignee, the Court of Appeal overturned the High Court's dismissal of Mrs Taylor's appeal against the Official Assignee's decisions to set aside dispositions by Mrs Taylor to her family trust prior to her bankruptcy.

    Mr and Mrs Taylor settled the family trust in October 2000.  The dispositions in question occurred between December 2000 and January 2007.  Mrs Taylor was adjudicated bankrupt in November 2006.

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Buddle Findlay, Fraud
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Buddle Findlay
    Delay tactics unsuccessful in staving off liquidation
    2011-10-04

    InThe Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Blackmore Trust Ltd, Blackmore tried to stave off liquidation for the sum of $1.4 million owed to the IRD.  After six or seven adjournments, Blackmore finally put evidence before the Court (albeit through its lawyer, rather than by affidavit) claiming that its liabilities totalled $15.6 million, and its sole asset, the James Smith building in the Wellington CBD, was valued at $21.5 million as a going concern, or $11 million - $13 million in a "fire sale".

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Buddle Findlay, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Prejudice, Companies Act
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Buddle Findlay
    Late filing will preclude rights to set aside and to appeal
    2011-04-04

    Khan v Reid acts as a reminder to file applications and appeals promptly.

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Buddle Findlay
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Buddle Findlay
    Insolvent corporate trustee's "empty shell" policy challenged
    2010-12-17

    ACC had contracted OPC to provide services. OPC's directors later established the OPC Trust, with OPC as the trustee, and 3 residuary trusts as beneficiaries.

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Buddle Findlay, Beneficiary, Trustee
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Buddle Findlay
    Legal update on insolvency law - January 2021
    2021-01-29

    The real lesson from Debut Homes – don't stiff the tax (wo)man

    The Supreme Court has overturned the 2019 Court of Appeal decision Cooper v Debut Homes Limited (in liquidation) [2019] NZCA 39 and restored the orders made by the earlier High Court decision, reminding directors that the broad duties under the Companies Act require consideration of the interests of all creditors, and not just a select group. This is the first time New Zealand’s highest court has considered sections 131, 135 and 136 of the Companies Act, making this a significant decision.

    Filed under:
    Australia, New Zealand, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Buddle Findlay, Coronavirus
    Authors:
    David Broadmore , David Perry , Jan Etwell , Kelly Paterson , Scott Abel , Scott Barker , Willie Palmer , Peter Niven , Myles O'Brien , Bridie McKinnon , Matthew Triggs , Oliver Gascoigne , Luke Sizer , Annie Cao
    Location:
    Australia, New Zealand
    Firm:
    Buddle Findlay

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 3407
    • Page 3408
    • Page 3409
    • Page 3410
    • Current page 3411
    • Page 3412
    • Page 3413
    • Page 3414
    • Page 3415
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days