Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Cross-affiliate netting provision in ISDA swap agreement is not enforceable against the debtor
    2011-12-19

    In re Lehman Brothers Inc., Bankr. Case No. 08-01420 (JMP) (SIPA), 2011 WL 4553015 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2011)  

    CASE SNAPSHOT

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Debt, UBS, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Brian M. Schenker
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Court recharacterizes claim, declines to adopt a per se rule that recharacterization only applies to insiders
    2011-12-19

    Grossman v. Lothian Oil Incorporated, 650 F.3d 539 (5th Cir., 2011)  

    CASE SNAPSHOT

    In a case of first impression in the Fifth Circuit, the court recharacterized a claim of a non-insider, declining to create a per se rule that recharacterization could only apply to insiders.

    FACTUAL BACKGROUND

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Debt, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Ann E. Pille
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    The seller of loan participation interests protected from preference recovery under the ‘conduit theory’
    2011-12-19

    Northern Capital, Inc. v. The Stockton National Bank, et al. (In re Brooke Corporation), 2011 WL 4543484 (Bankr. D. Kan. Sept. 28, 2011)

    CASE SNAPSHOT

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP
    Authors:
    Ann E. Pille
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Commercial restructuring & bankruptcy alert - Vol. VII, No. 4 (December 2011)
    2011-12-19

    The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to settle the dispute as to whether secured creditors can credit bid in connection with asset sales done pursuant to liquidating plans. The Third Circuit in the Philadelphia Newspapers case and the Fifth Circuit in the Pacific Lumber case held that secured creditors do not have a statutory right to credit bid their debt at a sale conducted under a plan of reorganization pursuant to which the debtor elects to provide the secured creditors with the “indubitable equivalent” of their secured claim.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Peter S. Clark, II
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    ‘Indubitable equivalence’ not proven in proposal to effect partial conveyance of property in full satisfaction of claim
    2011-12-19

    In re SUD Properties, Inc., Case No. 11-03833-8-RDD (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2011)  

    CASE SNAPSHOT

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Reed Smith LLP, Debtor, Legal burden of proof
    Authors:
    Jared S. Roach
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Claims under TBA contracts do not qualify as customers’ claims in broker-dealers’ liquidation
    2011-12-19

    Judge James M. Peck of the United States Bank-ruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York on December 8, 2011 issued an opinion on a motion of the Lehman Brothers Inc. (“LBI”) trustee (“Trustee”) to confirm his determination that certain claims relating to settled on delivery-versus-payment “to be announced” (“TBA”) contracts do not qualify as customer claims against the LBI estate and therefore are not entitled to Securities Investor Protection Act (“SIPA”) coverage.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dechert LLP, Security (finance), Broker-dealer, Lehman Brothers
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dechert LLP
    Bankruptcy Court determines that TBA contracts do not qualify as customer claims
    2011-12-16

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issued a memorandum decision in the Lehman Brothers Inc. (LBI) liquidation proceeding confirming the LBI trustee’s determination that certain claims relating to TBA contracts do not qualify as customer claims against LBI’s estate.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Mortgage-backed security, Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Court finds defendants knowingly waived right to jury trial, affirms such waivers must be clear
    2011-12-19

    Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. v. Bethany Holdings Group, LLC, et al., 2011 WL 3427013, (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 5, 2011)

    CASE SNAPSHOT

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Reed Smith LLP, Surety, Waiver, Jury trial, Default (finance), Lehman Brothers
    Authors:
    Kathleen A. Murphy
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Strict compliance with Section 524(c) required to uphold reaffirmation contract
    2011-12-19

    Sandburg Financial Corp. v. American Rice, Inc. (In the Matter of American Rice, Inc.), No. 11-40301 (5th Cir., Sept. 22, 2011)

    CASE SNAPSHOT

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Reed Smith LLP, Injunction, Debt, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Joseph D. Filloy
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Court finds material questions of fact regarding breach of fiduciary duties and deepening insolvency
    2011-12-19

    Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Baldwin (In re Lemington Home for the Aged), No. 10-4456 (3d Cir., Sept. 21, 2011)

    CASE SNAPSHOT

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Fiduciary, Board of directors
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 1883
    • Page 1884
    • Page 1885
    • Page 1886
    • Current page 1887
    • Page 1888
    • Page 1889
    • Page 1890
    • Page 1891
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days