Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Fruehauf opinion illustrates that despite a preference to allow amendment of pleadings, courts won't always allow amendment
    2011-08-10

    Summary

    In a 23 page decision signed July 15, 2011, Judge Walsh of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court denied a motion to allow a plaintiff to file an amended complaint, holding that the amended complaint was too deficient to survive a motion to dismiss and therefore would not be allowed. Judge Walsh’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Fraud, Statute of limitations, Federal Reporter, Liquidation, Constitutional amendment, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (USA), United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit, Trustee
    Authors:
    L. John Bird
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Trustee files more avoidance actions in NWL holdings
    2010-10-31

    In August, the Chapter 7 Trustee in the National Wholesale Liquidators ("NWL") bankruptcy filing approximately 90 preference actions. Just recently, the Trustee filed over 100 more preference actions in NWL. In November of 2008, I wrote about the commencement of NWL bankruptcy (read my prior post concerning the NWL bankruptcy here).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), United States bankruptcy court, Trustee
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Delaware's choice-of-law analysis as provided in a decision in PMTS Liquidating Corp., which partially granted a motion to dismiss
    2011-08-01

    Summary

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Fraud, Fiduciary, Board of directors, Federal Reporter, Liquidation, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (USA), Goldman Sachs, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit, Trustee
    Authors:
    L. John Bird
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Decision in Archway Cookies grants summary judgment based on ordinary course of business defense
    2010-10-04

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Legal burden of proof, Liquidation, US Code, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit, US District Court for District of Delaware, Trustee
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    GM announces details of U.S. Treasury’s asset sale proposal; unofficial committee of bondholders indicates support of proposal
    2009-05-28

    This morning, General Motors Corp. (GM) announced in a Form 8-K filing that the U.S. Treasury Department has proposed details of a reorganization plan to GM in the event that GM seeks bankruptcy protection and bankruptcy court approval for the sale of substantially all of its assets to a newly organized company (New GM) pursuant to Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code (363 Sale). Following the proposed 363 Sale, the U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Alston & Bird LLP, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Trade union, Beneficiary, Debt, Voluntary association, Liquidation, Warrant (finance), HM Treasury (UK), US Department of the Treasury, General Motors, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Anjali Desai
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    SDNY bankruptcy court upholds swap provision that modifies the method to calculate amounts owing upon the counterparty’s bankruptcy
    2013-12-23

    TheLehman Brothers bankruptcy court has determined that the contractually specified methodology for conducting the liquidation of a swap agreement is protected by the safe harbor provisions of the bankruptcy, even if the selected methodology would be more favorable to the non-defaulting counterparty than the liquidation methodology that would apply absent the bankruptcy.See Michigan State Housing Dev. Auth. v. Lehman Bros. Deriv. Prods. Inc. (In re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.), No. 08-13555, ---B.R.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Alston & Bird LLP, Bankruptcy, Swap (finance), Liquidation, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for SDNY
    Authors:
    David A. Wender , Jason H. Watson , Aimee M. Cummo , Karen Gelernt , John Spears
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    Barclays Capital and Lehman Brothers settle dispute for $689 million
    2009-02-13

    Earlier this week, Barclays Capital Inc., the investment banking unit and capital markets unit of Barclays plc, and Lehman Brothers Inc., the brokerage unit of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., entered into a settlement under which Barclays Capital will receive approximately $689 million in cash and securities for securities belonging to customers of Lehman Brothers that were never transferred when Barclays plc closed the sale for Lehman Brothers on Septemb

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Alston & Bird LLP, Clearing (finance), Security (finance), Investment banking, Liquidation, Brokerage firm, Barclays, Lehman Brothers, Securities Investor Protection Corporation, United States bankruptcy court, Trustee
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    The elusive upstream ‘C’
    2013-02-01

    The Upstream C Reorganization

    In the late 20th century, the IRS made a combination of unrelated decisions resulting in a proliferation of upstream C reorganizations. First was the repeal of the Bausch & Lomb rule, meaning that the equity held by a parent corporation in its subsidiary could count as continuity of interest, thus allowing the liquidation of a subsidiary to be treated as an upstream C reorganization. Second, the invention of the check-the-box regulations made subsidiary liquidations (and hence upstream reorganizations) so much easier.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Alston & Bird LLP, Debt, Liquidation
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    Federal responses to the financial crisis during the week of September 14
    2008-09-19

    Over the past two weeks, the federal government has relied on nearly every legal authority available to address the unfolding crisis in financial institutions with large mortgage-related holdings — direct and indirect financial assistance, government takeovers and even a decision to let the bankruptcy process run its course have all come into play. Today, several new actions have been announced, together with proposals that would require Congressional action.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Alston & Bird LLP, Collateral (finance), Security (finance), Market liquidity, Bailout, Federal Reserve Board, Liquidation, Mortgage-backed security, Commercial paper, US Securities and Exchange Commission, US Department of the Treasury, American International Group, Federal Reserve System, Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    World’s longest letter ruling
    2012-11-01

    LTR 201240017 is the world’s longest letter ruling, 111 pages in PDF format. Not surprisingly, it is a Section 355 ruling. It was issued three-and-a-half months after the original submission, with those dates bridging Christmas and New Year’s Day. There were seven additional submissions from the taxpayer in the interim. The release of the ruling was delayed for a couple of months.

    Filed under:
    USA, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Alston & Bird LLP, Liquidation, Holding company
    Authors:
    Jasper L. (Jack) Cummings , Jr.
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 256
    • Page 257
    • Page 258
    • Page 259
    • Current page 260
    • Page 261
    • Page 262
    • Page 263
    • Page 264
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days