Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Delaware Bankruptcy Court grants Chapter 15 protection over U.S. assets of Cayman Islands fund in liquidation
    2010-01-26

    In a recent decision, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”) granted protection over the U.S. assets of a Cayman Islands exempted company in liquidation. See Revised Order Recognizing Foreign Proceeding (the “Order”), In re Saad Investments Finance Company (No.5) Limited (“SIFCO5”), Case No. 09-13985 (KG) (Bankr. D. Del. Dec. 17, 2009) (Docket No. 47). The company, SIFCO5, is subject to official liquidation proceedings in the Cayman Islands, which the Bankruptcy Court found was eligible for relief under chapter 15 of the U.S.

    Filed under:
    Cayman Islands, USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Debtor, Privately held company, Hedge funds, Limited partnership, Liquidation, Investment company, Liquidator (law), US Code, Title 11 of the US Code, Barclays, Bear Stearns, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware, US District Court for SDNY
    Authors:
    Harry S. Davis , Karen S. Park , Brian D. Pfeiffer
    Location:
    Cayman Islands, USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Claim resolution agreement, segregated assets, U.K. high court rulings
    2009-12-17

    As previously described in our Alert of Oct.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Share (finance), Conflict of laws, Unsecured debt, Debt, Liquidation, Election, Pro rata, Lehman Brothers, High Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Lawrence V. Gelber , Craig Stein , Ron Feldman
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    ADI Liquidation, Inc. avoidance actions filed
    2016-09-12

    On September 7-8, 2016, various debtors in the ADI Liquidation, Inc. (f/k/a AWI Delaware, Inc.), et al. bankruptcy proceeding filed approximately 332 complaints seeking the avoidance and recovery of allegedly preferential and/or fraudulent transfers under Sections 544 and/or 547, 548 and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code (depending upon the nature of the underlying transactions). The Debtors also seek to disallow claims of such defendants under Sections 502(d) and (j) of the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Liquidation
    Authors:
    Carl D. Neff
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Decision in DBSI delays motion for summary judgment
    2011-06-07

    Summary

    In an 11 page opinion published May 27, 2011, Judge Walsh granted a motion under F.R.C.P. 56(d) and quoted another opinion which says “where the facts are in possession of the moving party a continuance of a motion for summary judgment for purposes of discovery should be granted almost as a matter of course.” Judge Walsh’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Breach of contract, Federal Reporter, Discovery, Consideration, Liquidation, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (USA), Third Circuit, Trustee
    Authors:
    L. John Bird
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Litigation trustee in SemCrude files preference complaints
    2010-07-25

    Earlier this month, Bettina M Whyte, the SemGroup Litigation Trustee (the "Trustee") filed approximately 350 adversary actions against various creditors in the SemCrude bankruptcy. The majority of the adversary actions are preference actions under 11 U.S.C. section 547 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Some of the adversary actions, however, allege defendants received fraudulent transfers from various SemCrude debtors (the "Debtors").

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Fraud, Liquidation, US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware, Trustee
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    SDNY rules that distribution of liquidated swap agreement collateral is protected by the safe harbor in Bankruptcy Code Section 560
    2016-09-05

    In the recent decision of Lehman Bros. Special Fin. Inc. v. Bank of Am. Nat’l Assoc. (In re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.), 2016 WL 3621180 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. June 28, 2016), the U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Collateral (finance), Safe harbor (law), Liquidation, Collateralized debt obligation, Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for SDNY, Trustee
    Authors:
    Carl D. Neff
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Trustee in GRA liquidation (Black Angus Restaurants) files preference complaints
    2011-05-16

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Leisure & Tourism, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Letter of credit, Debtor, Limited liability company, Liquidation, Secured loan, US District Court for Central District of California, United States bankruptcy court, Trustee
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Landsource Communities Development commences preference actions
    2010-06-10

    Recently, the LandSource Creditor Litigation Liquidating Trust (the "Litigation Trust"), commenced various avoidance actions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. This post will look briefly at the events leading to the commencement of this bankruptcy proceeding. Further, the post will look at some of the issues that confronted the Debtor during the reorganization process.

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Unsecured debt, Debt, Economy, Liquidation, Debtor in possession, Barclays, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Another wave of standard register company preference actions filed
    2016-05-16

    From May 11 to May 13, 2016, SRC Liquidation, LLC International Holdings, LLC (“Liquidating Debtor”), unleashed yet another wave of preference actions, filing approximately 257 additional complaints seeking the avoidance and recovery of allegedly preferential and fraudulent transfers under Sections 547 and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Liquidating Debtor also seeks to disallow claims of such preference defendants under Sections 502(d) and (j) of the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Fox Rothschild LLP, Limited liability company, Liquidation
    Authors:
    Carl D. Neff
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Decision in DBSI Inc., holds that the "particularity" requirement of F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) and 9(b) was satisfied, notwithstanding the number of alleged fraudulent transfers
    2011-05-09

    Summary

    In a 10 page decision signed May 5, 2011, Judge Walsh of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court denied a motion to dismiss and held that the plaintiff Litigation Trustee satisfied the “particularity” requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b), despite having his complaint allege that each transfer within a 13 page list of transfers was fraudulent. Judge Walsh’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Fraud, Consideration, Debt, Liquidation, Conveyancing, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (USA), United States bankruptcy court, Trustee
    Authors:
    L. John Bird
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 253
    • Page 254
    • Page 255
    • Page 256
    • Current page 257
    • Page 258
    • Page 259
    • Page 260
    • Page 261
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days