Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Rumors of the demise of creditor derivative suits on behalf of LLCs not an exaggeration
    2011-04-01

    A decision recently handed down by the Delaware Chancery Court, CML V, LLC v. Bax, indicates that creditors of a limited liability company (“LLC”) organized under Delaware law do not have standing to institute derivative suits against an LLC’s management, even when the LLC is insolvent, unless the right is expressly set forth in the LLC’s organizational documents or external agreements.

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Limited liability company, Standing (law), Liquidation, Duty of care, Bad faith, Subsidiary, Derivative suit, Court of Chancery, Delaware Court of Chancery
    Authors:
    Nicholas C. Kamphaus
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    State court receiverships and assignments for benefit of creditors
    2011-03-31

    Click here to view the webinar.

    Click here for the PowerPoint presentation.

    Click here for the presentation materials.

    State Court Receiverships

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Nexsen Pruet, Debtor, Limited liability company, Foreclosure, Liquidation, Investment company, Right to property, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (USA)
    Authors:
    Christine L. Myatt
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Nexsen Pruet
    TUPE and administrations: Oakland v Wellswood rejected
    2011-03-31

    Administrations, including "pre-packs", are not capable of constituting "insolvency proceedings...instituted with a view to the liquidation of the assets of the transferor" within the meaning of Regulation 8(7) of TUPE. Where there is a sale of an undertaking by an administrator, the employees assigned to the undertaking will automatically transfer to the buyer and receive unfair dismissal protection.

    Key facts

    Filed under:
    USA, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Contractual term, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Unfair dismissal, Precondition, Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (UK), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Chapter 7 trustee in Indalex bankruptcy files preference actions
    2011-03-29

    Earlier this month, the Chapter 7 Trustee (the "Trustee") appointed in the Indalex bankruptcy began filing avoidance actions against various Indalex creditors. For those not familiar with the Indalex bankruptcy, Indalex filed petitions for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on March 20, 2009. Prior to filing bankruptcy, Indalex was one of the largest aluminum extruders in the United States.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Interest, Limited liability partnership, Liquidation, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Receiverships: you don't know what you don't know
    2011-04-06

    Receiverships are on the rise in Ohio and across the Midwest. In most cases, the appointment of a receiver heralds the close of a business. Receiverships are also commonly part of a foreclosure proceeding. Calfee's Business Restructuring and Insolvency practice group lawyers have extensive experience with both state and federal court receiverships and we can assist you in determining the impact of a receivership on your business.

    Filed under:
    USA, Ohio, Insolvency & Restructuring, Calfee Halter & Griswold LLP, Confidentiality, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Unsecured debt, Foreclosure, Liquidation, Common law
    Authors:
    Jean R. Robertson , James M. Lawniczak , Nathan A. Wheatley
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Calfee Halter & Griswold LLP
    Opportunities for creditors under the revised Receivership Act
    2011-04-18

    Washington Governor Christine Gregoire has signed into law a series of changes to the state Receivership Act that will make it easier (and possibly cheaper) for creditors to utilize the Receivership Act as a tool to resolve troubled loan situations with their borrowers. The revisions will become effective 90 days after the Legislature adjourns, making July 24, 2011, the likely effective date. The changes clarify a number of points that previously puzzled both judges and practitioners.

    Creditors' Rights

    Filed under:
    USA, Washington, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Lane Powell PC, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Option (finance), Foreclosure, Liability (financial accounting), Economy, Liquidation, Asset forfeiture
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lane Powell PC
    What do bankruptcy filings tell us about the economy?
    2011-04-14

    The latest numbers on bankruptcy filings in 2010 have been released, and 1.53 million Americans filed for bankruptcy protection last year, an increase of 9% over 2009’s figures. This number is the highest number of bankruptcy filings since the passage of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA) became law in 2005. In that year, 2 million Americans filed bankruptcy in order to file before BAPCPA’s restrictions on bankruptcy filings took effect.  

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd, Bankruptcy, Retail, Consumer protection, Economy, Liquidation
    Authors:
    Richard (Jay) J Reding
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd
    New York high court holds choice of law should be employed for each policy in Midland Insurance liquidation proceedings
    2011-04-19

    On March 17, 2010 we reported on the decision of a New York intermediate appellate court to apply New York law to disallowed claims under insurance policies issued by Midland Insurance Company, an insolvent multiline insurer placed into liquidation in New York.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Jorden Burt LLP, Liquidation, Choice of law, New York Court of Appeals
    Authors:
    Michael Wolgin
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jorden Burt LLP
    New York’s highest court requires policyholder-specific choice-of-law analysis by insurers in liquidation
    2011-04-19

    The New York Court of Appeals decision on April 5, in the Midland Insurance Company liquidation (In re Liquidation of Midland Insurance Company1) is an important affirmation of policyholder rights. In this decision, New York’s highest court held that a policyholder is entitled to a claim and policy-specific choice of law analysis in the liquidation process, rejecting the Midland liquidator’s effort to make a blanket application of New York law to Midland’s 38,000 policyholders.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Conflict of laws, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Liability insurance, Common law, Liquidator (law), Choice of law, New York Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Paul A. Zevnik
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
    FDIC issues report on how its resolution authority could have applied to Lehman Brothers
    2011-04-25

    On April 18th, the FDIC released a report examining how it could have structured an orderly resolution of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. under the orderly liquidation authority of the Dodd-Frank Act had that law been in effect at the time.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Winston & Strawn LLP, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Liquidation, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Lehman Brothers, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 163
    • Page 164
    • Page 165
    • Page 166
    • Current page 167
    • Page 168
    • Page 169
    • Page 170
    • Page 171
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days