Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Certain employee statutory dues are not a part of the “liquidation estate” of a corporate debtor
    2023-02-24

    In the case of State Bank of India v. Moser Baer Karamachari Union & Ors., the Supreme Court of India (“Supreme Court”) has upheld the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT”) in the matter of State Bank of India v. Moser Baer Karamachari Union & Anr. (“Moser Baer Case”).

    Filed under:
    India, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, JSA, Debtor, Liquidation, Liquidated damages, Liquidator (law), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Aashit Shah , Malika Tiwari
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    JSA
    Fifth Circuit Follows Ninth Circuit, Allows Post-Bankruptcy Contract Rate Interest In Solvent Debtor Case
    2022-11-14

    “… [B]ecause Congress has not clearly abrogated the solvent-debtor exception,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that a reorganized solvent debtor had to “pay what it promised now that it is financially capable.” In re Ultra Petroleum Corp., 2022 WL 8025329, *1, (5th Cir. Oct. 14, 2022) (2-1). Moreover, “given [the debtor’s ] solvency, post-petition interest is to be calculated according to the agreed-upon … contractual default rate …,” not the “much lower Federal Judgment Rate …,” held the court. Id.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Liquidated damages, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Major projects & construction: 5 Minute Fix 23
    2018-11-08

    Get your 5 Minute Fix of major projects and construction news. This issue: discover the latest cladding developments; resources construction work now caught by WA training levy; mind the gap: public transport at the urban fringe; avoid slip-ups in your payment schedule; and the availability of insolvency processes under the Corporations Act 2001 for recovering SOP debts.

    Cladding update ‒ NSW

    Filed under:
    Australia, Arbitration & ADR, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clayton Utz, Liquidated damages, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Sergio Capelli , Frank Bannon , Dale Brackin , Stuart Cosgriff , Philip Dawson , Lina Fischer , Andrew Fry , Naomi Kelly , Steven Klimt , David Lester , Clive Luck , Alan Maguire , Jonathan McTigue , Frazer Moss , Steven Murray , Steve O'Reilly , Joanna Pugsley , John Shirbin , Chris Slocombe
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Clayton Utz
    An Analysis of Liquidated Damages and Contract Rejection in Bankruptcy
    2020-06-02

    As the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic continues to devastate economies worldwide, we’re seeing a wave of Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings. These filings, which provide protection to companies as they reorganize their businesses so creditors may be paid over a period of time, have surged 26% in April (up from the 444 filings in April 2019).

    The economic impact has been far-reaching. Notable examples include:

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Law Department Management, Legal Tech, Kira Systems, Liquidated damages, Coronavirus, Title 11 of the US Code
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kira Systems
    Have set off rights been restricted by the PPSA without anyone noticing?
    2017-10-09

    A recent Western Australia decision in the receivership and liquidation of a construction company may have overturned the hitherto accepted view that set-off remains effective against a receiver.

    The case in question could cost the principal tens of millions of dollars and is under appeal. The finding is potentially relevant in New Zealand because the provisions relied on are materially identical to those in our Companies Act and Personal Property Securities Act (PPSA).

    Filed under:
    Australia, New Zealand, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Chapman Tripp, Liquidated damages
    Authors:
    Michael Arthur , Michael Harper , Hamish Foote , Edward Scorgie , John McKay , Brian Clayton
    Location:
    Australia, New Zealand
    Firm:
    Chapman Tripp
    Australian Construction Dispute resolution Newsletter - October 2016
    2016-10-14

    Welcome to this issue of Herbert Smith Freehills' Australian Construction Dispute Resolution Newsletter.

    This newsletter updates you on legal developments relevant to your industry by featuring Australian court decisions and legislative developments of particular interest.

    In this issue, we look at:

    Filed under:
    Australia, Arbitration & ADR, Company & Commercial, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Credit card, Dispute resolution, Liquidated damages, High Court of Australia
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    When are LDS a penalty?
    2015-05-08

    In brief: The Supreme Court of Queensland recently considered whether liquidated damages in a standard form construction contract were a penalty. In a decision that traversed long-held doctrines on penalties and recent developments in Andrews and Paciocco, the court ruled that the obligation to pay liquidated damages in this case was not penal.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Queensland, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Allens, Liquidated damages
    Authors:
    Nick Rudge , David Donnelly
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Allens
    My claim is bigger than yours: set-off against insolvent claimants under Security of Payment Act
    2015-03-05

    Key Points:

    Principals or contractors dealing with insolvent downstream companies should ensure they can properly substantiate any counterclaims.

    Usually a principal is not entitled to rely on a set-off or counterclaim to resist court proceedings to recover a debt under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002 (Vic) (SOP Act). However because of the operation of section 553C of the Corporations Act, the situation is different if the claimant is in liquidation.

    Insolvent subcontractor’s claim

    Filed under:
    Australia, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Clayton Utz, Subcontractor, Liquidated damages
    Authors:
    Jonathan McTigue
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Clayton Utz
    Liquidated damages in energy projects
    2019-01-10

    In a noteworthy decision to participants in the energy industry, the High Court of England & Wales examined what constitutes a valid liquidated damages clause in the event of delayed completion of a solar project. And last week in Singapore, the High Court considered the enforceability of liquidated damages provisions on termination of power purchase agreements.

    Filed under:
    Singapore, United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Projects & Procurement, White & Case, Renewable energy, Liquidated damages, Power purchase agreement
    Authors:
    Michael Turrini , Luke Robottom , Paddy Mohen , Alice McDonnell
    Location:
    Singapore, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    White & Case
    Decoding the code - China's new General Civil Law Rules: the first step towards a comprehensive civil code
    2017-03-15

    Decoding the code - China's new General Civil Law Rules: the first step towards a comprehensive civil code June 2017 Decoding the code - China's new General Civil Law Rules: the first step towards a comprehensive civil code June 2017 1 Overview and background On 15 March 2017, the People's Republic of China General Civil Law Rules (中华人民共和国 民法总则) (hereinafter referred to as the "GCLR") were formally adopted at the Fifth Session of the Twelfth National People's Congress. The GCLR will enter into force on 1 October 2017.

    Filed under:
    China, Company & Commercial, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Public, Hogan Lovells, Statute of limitations, Liquidated damages
    Location:
    China
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells

    Pagination

    • Current page 1
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days