Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Limited time for holders of Lehman Brothers credit default swaps to participate in ISDA settlement protocol
    2008-10-05

    Clients who desire to participate in the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) 2008 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“Lehman”) Credit Default Swap (“CDS”) Settlement Protocol (the “Settlement Protocol”) must do so by Wednesday, October 8, 2008 at 5:00 p.m. (New York time). The period to join the Settlement Protocol opens on Monday, October 6, 2008; accordingly, there is a relatively narrow window for clients to elect to participate.

    Filed under:
    Global, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Bond (finance), Swap (finance), Debt, Communications protocol, Credit default swap, Subordinated debt, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers
    Location:
    Global
    Firm:
    Lowenstein Sandler LLP
    Netting Law allows settlement of qualified financial contracts
    2018-11-19

    The UAE has issued by Decree Federal Law No. (10) of 2018 on Netting (theUAE Netting Law), with the aim of strengthening the regulatory framework for the settlement of obligations arising from qualified financial contracts. Parties to a contract previously relied on Article 183 of Federal Law No. (9) of 2016 on Bankruptcy (the Bankruptcy Law) to settle debts agreed to under a contract, provided that it is within the context of insolvency and that such contract does not fall within the claw-back provisions (Article 168 of the Bankruptcy Law).

    Filed under:
    United Arab Emirates, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Baker McKenzie, Bankruptcy, Debt, Financial regulation, International Swaps and Derivatives Association
    Authors:
    Mazen Boustany , Matthew Shanahan
    Location:
    United Arab Emirates
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    Netting Law
    2019-01-31

    The New UAE Netting Law

    Netting is a standard mechanism used in banking and financial markets for the settlement and payment of competing rights or interests between counterparties. This occurs through an agreed process of termination and evaluation of such rights or interests and consolidation to one single (or ‘net’) payment from one party to another, minimising the overall credit and settlement risk.

    Filed under:
    United Arab Emirates, Banking, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Al Tamimi & Company, Central bank, Dubai International Financial Centre, International Swaps and Derivatives Association
    Authors:
    Maria Drenova
    Location:
    United Arab Emirates
    Firm:
    Al Tamimi & Company
    Netting - A detailed analysis
    2019-07-07

    Given the absence of any mandatory set-off rights on insolvency in the current UAE Bankruptcy Law, the application and effectiveness of netting provisions in financial market contracts made with a UAE counterparty has historically been uncertain.

    Filed under:
    United Arab Emirates, DIFC, GCC, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Hadef & Partners, Capital requirement, International Swaps and Derivatives Association
    Location:
    United Arab Emirates
    Firm:
    Hadef & Partners
    Netting in the UAE
    2018-11-12

    In brief:

    Filed under:
    United Arab Emirates, Insolvency & Restructuring, Hadef & Partners, Bankruptcy, Derivatives market, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Trustee
    Authors:
    Alan Rodgers
    Location:
    United Arab Emirates
    Firm:
    Hadef & Partners
    Industry responds to Treasury informal consultation on segregation and porting
    2012-09-14

    Several industry associations (ISDA, BBA and FOA – the futures and options association) have responded to a Treasury informal consultation on the need to carve out from English insolvency law the porting of clearing clients’ positions and margin. They agree on the need to ensure certainty around the porting option when a clearing member becomes insolvent. EMIR’s porting option should also apply where the clearing member is acting through back-to-back transactions and holds the client’s margin. The associations note that porting should be subject to agreement.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Capital Markets, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, International Swaps and Derivatives Association
    Authors:
    Roy Neillie
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    UK Special Administration Regime
    2011-11-03

    The UK Financial Services Authority (“FSA”) confirmed on 31 Oct. 2011 that MF Global UK Limited (“MF Global UK”) will be subject to the new Special Administration Regime (“SAR”).[1] This is the first time that the new regime, set out in The Investment Bank Special Administration Regulations 2011 (“SAR Regulations”)[2] has been invoked.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Futures contract, Investment banking, Best practice, Lehman Brothers cases, Pro rata, HM Treasury (UK), International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers, FSA, Bank of England, National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, Banking Act 2009 (UK)
    Authors:
    Ron Feldman , Lawrence V. Gelber
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Derivatives transactions with offshore counterparties
    2011-08-17

    Key Issues

    The transaction documents (eg ISDA, GMRA or prime brokerage agreements) for derivatives transactions (or other transactions involving netting provisions) are usually governed by English law or New York law. However, there are a number of local law issues which our clients should consider when proposing to enter into such transactions with offshore counterparties, including the following key issues:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Private Client & Offshore Services, Ogier, Collateral (finance), Marketing, Arbitration award, Investment funds, Default (finance), Choice of law, International Swaps and Derivatives Association
    Authors:
    Bruce MacNeil
    Location:
    United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Ogier
    anti-deprivation: a question of substance not form
    2011-07-29

    In the much anticipated decision of Belmont Park Investments PTY Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc [2011] UKSC 38 the Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the appeal of Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc (“LBSF”) and in so doing provided clarification as to the scope and application of the anti-deprivation rule (the “Rule”).

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mayer Brown, Collateral (finance), Interest, Swap (finance), Consideration, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers, Court of Appeal of England & Wales, UK Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Devi Shah , Ashley Katz , Kristy Zander , Alexandra Wood , Jennifer Fox
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    ISDA Master Agreement: High Court interprets Section 2(a)(iii)
    2011-02-18

    Introduction

    For all of the legal difficulties which market participants are facing in light of the insolvency of Lehman Brothers, the insolvency is providing the Courts with the opportunity to pass judgment on many of the tricky provisions of the 1992 and 2002 versions of the ISDA Master Agreement (together the "Agreements").

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Contractual term, Condition precedent, Statutory interpretation, Concession (contract), Default (finance), International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers
    Authors:
    Paul M. Dillon , Nicholas Horsfield
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Current page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days